Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-08-2013, 07:59 AM | #11 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
Luke 24:45-46 -- Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures. 46 He told them, “This is what is written: The Messiah will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day... Where in the OT is this statement written? |
|
03-08-2013, 08:03 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Quote:
This line Deuteronomy 32:39 appears in a number of early Church Fathers - "See now that I myself am He! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand" - as a reference to Jesus's theophany. |
|
03-08-2013, 08:07 AM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Do we have a credent walking bravely into the jaws of reason?
|
03-08-2013, 08:20 AM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I am just saying that if the author of the gospel was influenced by Samaritanism he could have interpreted the appearance of Jesus the God as a fulfillment of the prophesy in Deuteronomy 32
|
03-08-2013, 08:25 AM | #15 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
It seems in context that God is saying he is the only God... He puts to death and brings to life. He controls the fate of all. He kills and he creates life. He wounds and he heals (he wounded the Israelites because they were unfaithful, but he also heals them because of his promise). This theme is littered throughout the OT. I don't see the Jewish Messiah anywhere in Deu 32. :huh: |
|
03-08-2013, 09:42 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Well you've already identified why you can't make the connection between the 'Great Song' and the gospel:
1. the Samaritan tradition doesn't recognize the concept of THE messiah 2. the term doesn't appear in Deuteronomy 32. Nevertheless the Great Song is clearly understood to point to the age to come when the Creation will be perfected. The entire Book Four of the Memar Marqe is devoted to this interpretation. You can find the MacDonald translation at most reputable libraries. |
03-08-2013, 09:44 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Online resource for the proper understanding (or the Samaritan understanding) of the eschatological significance of Deuteronomy 32:
http://books.google.com/books?id=nh6...ong%22&f=false |
03-08-2013, 09:51 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
A section from MacDonald's translation of an early chapter of the Memar Book Four which relates to our topic:
Quote:
The problem we have of course is that we have been trained to look at the gospel as simply a historical narrative. If there was originally a mystical subtext to the material - a 'secret' or mystic gospel if you will - whereby all the strange practices of the heretics were explained (i.e. ritual castration, dietary restrictions, constant prayer etc), we could see that the purpose of the narrative was to explain or justify the original pseudo-historical context by which these practices were originally established. Remember the gospel was probably aimed at Gentiles (= individuals who for the most part hadn't been properly trained to understand the Torah i.e. didn't know enough Hebrew or Aramaic to understand the arguments that Marqe was making from the original Scriptural material). In short it was a picture book aimed at morons to explain why the elite thought of themselves as angels or living representatives of Jesus. |
|
03-08-2013, 10:53 AM | #19 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
03-08-2013, 03:09 PM | #20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Just Right Outside of Confusion
Posts: 85
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|