FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2006, 10:31 AM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Then the high priest rending his garments, saith: What need we any further witnesses? --Mark 14:63
No Robots is offline  
Old 07-26-2006, 10:31 AM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
This infantile mud throwing aside
The only person throwing mud, Ted, is you. Repeatedly. In fact, this entire post attests to your short-term, strawman memory, your inability to grasp what is being contested, and your abject failure to engage anyone on reasonable terms. This, your post, is a rant. An empty, polemical, invective laden piece of rhetoric that stands out in my recollection of IIDB posts as being among the least relevant to anything offered in the surrounding context

The simple fact is that this long-winded post addresses absolutely nothing of what was said about the merits of mythicists versus the merits of historicists--a topic Doherty, and not I, brought up. Not a word, Ted. And all the rhetoric in the world won't change the fact that you not only offer no substantiative response to the caveats I raised, you further exhibit a complete lack of understanding of the context or intent of those caveats.

One day, perhaps, you will move beyond ad hoc tirades about the Jesus Myth, and realize that not everything is a response or defense of it (which neither my, nor the post of Doherty I responded to, was). That day, apparently, has not dawned yet.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 07-26-2006, 11:18 AM   #93
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sumner
The only person throwing mud, Ted, is you. Repeatedly. In fact, this entire post attests to your short-term, strawman memory, your inability to grasp what is being contested, and your abject failure to engage anyone on reasonable terms. This, your post, is a rant. An empty, polemical, invective laden piece of rhetoric that stands out in my recollection of IIDB posts as being among the least relevant to anything offered in the surrounding context

The simple fact is that this long-winded post addresses absolutely nothing of what was said about the merits of mythicists versus the merits of historicists--a topic Doherty, and not I, brought up. Not a word, Ted. And all the rhetoric in the world won't change the fact that you not only offer no substantiative response to the caveats I raised, you further exhibit a complete lack of understanding of the context or intent of those caveats.

One day, perhaps, you will move beyond ad hoc tirades about the Jesus Myth, and realize that not everything is a response or defense of it (which neither my, nor the post of Doherty I responded to, was). That day, apparently, has not dawned yet.
But a day has dawned when it seems to have become a moral imperative to no longer facilitate Ted's hate campaign against HJ scholars or anyone who points out the holes in the MJ thesis.

I suggest then that from now on he be "sent to Coventry" and that none of us ever again responds to anything he posts here or elsewhere.

What say you?

Jeffrey Gibson
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 07-26-2006, 11:45 AM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

I think that sounds like a dandy idea--I can state with some confidence that we won't miss much.

As an aside, I just learned some rather distressing news. Apparently (like so many others), Geoff Hudson has realized that I don't exist

I'm rather saddened to learn that my friends and family in Calgary aren't really my friends and family since, like virtually every poster on every e-list/messageboard, I in fact live in Chicago.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 07-26-2006, 01:22 PM   #95
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sumner
...

Apparently (like so many others), Geoff Hudson has realized that I don't exist

...
This is almost as bizarre as what Geoff Hudson used to post here.

As for the rest of this thread, the participants have outstripped the moderators' abilities to keep up. So I'm going to lock the thread for now while we confer.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.