Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-16-2001, 02:34 PM | #71 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 410
|
I would have to disagree with Toto on the unweildiness of this thread. At under 2 full pages it is actually one of the shorter discussions we tend to have in this forum.
At the same time, if anyone wishes to start a new thread on the topic, then please do so. It is my hope that they would familiarize themself with what has already taken place. A final point, if I may, but as I have said in another discussion, telling us that some referenced material (especially stuff the poster has never read himself) is not making an argument, or even a valid point. The material on this thread remains quite unrefuted, however, and those that wish to support MacDonald's work are welcome to try. Nomad |
08-16-2001, 03:48 PM | #72 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
Anyone who is interested in MacDonald's thesis should not waste their time here - just read the book, look up a few reviews in the scholarly press, and realize that MacDonald is making a literary argument and not presenting a grand theory of everything in the Bible, or even everything in Mark. |
|
08-16-2001, 10:07 PM | #73 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
Considering MacDonald's brutal misuse of Homeric stories where they ARE cited (see the review of the book above), I would not be so quick to credit him with getting his story right here. Quote:
Nomad |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|