Um, again: challenging your fallacies and pointing out your double standards requires no interaction from you at all.

You did lie. You claimed I offered no sources. But I did.

1. You lied.
2. You were caught.
3. Deal with it.

If anyone really cares, the story can be found:
http://www.infidels.org/electronic/f...ML/000393.html

This whole question brings to mind an interesting what-if:

Let us say that we know next to nothing about L. Ron Hubbard outside from the teachings of the Church of Scientology. How much would we feel confident of asserting about him? Would we swallow as literal truth everything that the CoS says about him? Or would we wonder whether LRH is some sort of myth, some sort of projection of the ideal Scientologist?

However, instead of the very scanty outside evidence we have of Jesus Christ, we have oodles of it about LRH, and much of it paints a very different picture of him than the CoS does; LRH often comes across as a kook and a fraud.