Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-10-2001, 04:22 AM | #11 |
Beloved Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Posts: 864
|
Amos
Could you please explain what you posted? I really didn't understand what you said or what you were trying to say. Thanks Stan |
12-10-2001, 04:40 AM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
|
|
12-10-2001, 04:56 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
|
Quote:
Amen-Moses |
|
12-10-2001, 06:53 AM | #14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The entire bible is parable except where it is indicated to be otherwise such as in Jn.6:55 with the words "real food and real drink." Your analogy fails to recognoize that a parable IS real and therefore Jesus did die on the cross for the sins of the world but only for the sins of his world and told us to do the same for the sins of our world when he told us to "follow [him]." You should be carefull when adding weight of the Epistels to this because they were written for the herd mentality of the masses in effort to engender this event amogst them. In other words, it does not occur outside of a mythology. No, it does not remove anything from the foundation of Christianity and in fact adds to it by removing the historic component to make it a living tradition. It does, however, not agree with the protestant notion that Jesus died for the sins of their world but that does not really matter. A parable is a real life event that borrows conventional words to describe a non conventional (non-rational) event. The event is real or the entire parable/bible/mythology would not need to exist. Just like the Ark, the Cross symbol is used in many (?) mythologies because it is so descriptive of the real life event. Perhaps it would help for me to add that the conscious TOK is or becomes the enemy of the subconscious TOL (Gen.3:15) and that after the crucifixion of the persona the TOK becomes subjugated to the TOL and it is in this manner that Paradise will be regained. Amos |
|
12-10-2001, 03:53 PM | #15 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: na
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
Citing examples of other devotees who have died for their beliefs doesn't actually explain why the followers of Jesus were prepared to die for their faith in him - if in fact they did. Quote:
Incidentally, the information concerning Jesus' rejection by his family and townsfolk is in the Bible. I assume that you accept the Bible as reliable in recording these 'facts'? [ December 10, 2001: Message edited by: E_muse ]</p> |
||
12-10-2001, 08:31 PM | #16 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: nc
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
Quote:
Here again, you have provided a direct question with a sideline answer. |
||
12-11-2001, 08:31 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 536
|
If suffering was the requirement for redemption, I would have thought a slow burning of the skin over the course of a few days would have been real suffering. I think JC took the easy way out. Vinegar on a rag...ooooohhhh, I don't know how he could bare the pain of it all?
I think it was just the death that was the redemptive factor the church pushes not the suffering or else he should have really suffered. Now if it was just the death that was required, then why did God make him suffer the amount he did by this form of death? Back to the subject: First there was no Jesus who died on a cross, there were many people who died on a cross, but a myth can't die unless the masses find the next "real" God. |
12-12-2001, 08:05 AM | #18 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The beauty of it all is that it can be a real life event that we as individuals hope to encounter at midlife. Meno pause is the only time that we, as ark builders, can become eternal and so the mythology is directed towards the enhancement and beatification of this real life event. Amos |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|