![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The following article has been added to the infidels.org library:
Lowder provides a point-by-point rebuttal to Craig's case for the empty tomb. Along the way, Lowder defends a naturalistic explanation of the empty tomb. He concludes that historians should be agnostic about the empty tomb story. [This message has been edited by Kate Long (edited April 15, 2001).] |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I now see that James Still has already posted the above URL in another thread, New Paper on the Empty Tomb. I didn't see this earlier. for some reason. Sorry.
[This message has been edited by Kate Long (edited April 15, 2001).] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|