Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-14-2001, 09:30 PM | #41 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 12
|
the author's introduction.
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/preface.html bottom line: reason and purpose aside, it is a resource available to all. you can use it as you see fit. for myself, it saves me the burden of taking notes and sorting through them when i need the info. with the SAB, it's as easy as point and click. do i blindly follow everything there? nope. that would be contrary to being a skeptic. i don't agree with everything there, but (unlike the bibe itslef), total agreement is not necessary to make use of it. |
11-23-2001, 11:36 AM | #42 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
Just wanted to bury this horse: the bible is a pile of contradictory cult lies and the SAB details them.
Case closed. |
11-23-2001, 11:53 AM | #43 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
Irony remains my favorite form of humour. your endorsement of the SAB is noted Koy. Of course, it comes as no real surprise that your faith remains intact. Nomad |
|
11-23-2001, 01:35 PM | #44 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Do skeptics really not put much stock in the SAB, as SingleDad reluctantly granted? This is what needs explaining. I suspect I'll just find out that it's some mix of illogical skeptics and others who don't put much stock in it, but use it as a reference for their arguements and [hopefully!] investigate the context of all the material they intend to use, beforehand...
Everyone on this thread has said the same thing: the SAB is a useful quick reference. I've used it many times. It's an excellent quick reference for the contradictions, violence, silliness, bigotry, inhumanity and evil in the Bible. It is not a major guide to biblical scholarship or history, nor does it pretend to be. The author has aimed to be as inclusive as possible. Obviously some inclusions are judgement calls. I don't know what you mean; "put much stock in," Photocrat. The SAB is viewed here like any other resource: fallible, limited and human. On Evo/Cre we run into this problem a lot with books, because Christians keep thinking we have The Book (like the The Origin of the Species or The Selfish Gene) which we pant after like born-agains with an NT, but we skeptics only have books. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|