![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#41 | 
| 
			
			 Junior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2001 
				
				
				
					Posts: 12
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			the author's introduction. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/preface.html bottom line: reason and purpose aside, it is a resource available to all. you can use it as you see fit. for myself, it saves me the burden of taking notes and sorting through them when i need the info. with the SAB, it's as easy as point and click. do i blindly follow everything there? nope. that would be contrary to being a skeptic. i don't agree with everything there, but (unlike the bibe itslef), total agreement is not necessary to make use of it.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#42 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2000 
				Location: Yes, I have dyslexia.  Sue me. 
				
				
					Posts: 6,508
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Just wanted to bury this horse: the bible is a pile of contradictory cult lies and the SAB details them. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Case closed.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#43 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2000 
				Location: Calgary, AB, Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 410
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Irony remains my favorite form of humour. your endorsement of the SAB is noted Koy. Of course, it comes as no real surprise that your faith remains intact. ![]() Nomad  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#44 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2001 
				Location: Barrayar 
				
				
					Posts: 11,866
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Do skeptics really not put much stock in the SAB, as SingleDad reluctantly granted? This is what needs explaining. I suspect I'll just find out that it's some mix of illogical skeptics and others who don't put much stock in it, but use it as a reference for their arguements and [hopefully!] investigate the context of all the material they intend to use, beforehand... 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Everyone on this thread has said the same thing: the SAB is a useful quick reference. I've used it many times. It's an excellent quick reference for the contradictions, violence, silliness, bigotry, inhumanity and evil in the Bible. It is not a major guide to biblical scholarship or history, nor does it pretend to be. The author has aimed to be as inclusive as possible. Obviously some inclusions are judgement calls. I don't know what you mean; "put much stock in," Photocrat. The SAB is viewed here like any other resource: fallible, limited and human. On Evo/Cre we run into this problem a lot with books, because Christians keep thinking we have The Book (like the The Origin of the Species or The Selfish Gene) which we pant after like born-agains with an NT, but we skeptics only have books. Michael  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |