Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-16-2001, 03:04 PM | #11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2001, 04:12 PM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2001, 04:17 PM | #13 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
[This message has been edited by Layman (edited April 16, 2001).] |
|
04-16-2001, 05:37 PM | #14 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2001, 06:06 PM | #15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I don't mean to lead the thread too far afield, but I have my suspicions that Christianity itself probably pre-dates A.D. 33. I imagine it began decades earlier, and was later post-dated to the reign of Tiberius. Granted, it's entirely speculation. The existence of Jesus is even more doubtful, as this character's life & death resemble nothing so much as the heroic cycle of an agricultural myth. Had lunch with Earl Doherty, by the way, at the FFRF luncheon. Deep thinker. Though I probably didn't flatter him much by saying, "I've heard of your book -- maybe I'll get around to reading it someday." |
|
04-16-2001, 06:34 PM | #16 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Sounds pretty conclusory to me. "Here read this, then you'll believe." |
|
04-16-2001, 10:19 PM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Layman - the point of asking if you had read Doherty's book is to avoid repeating it.
We don't try to prove or disprove Moroni's existence because we know he is an imaginary figure. We also know that Joseph Smith was a real person. We live in a society that makes a pretty clear distinction. Early Christianity was not so concerned about real vs. imaginary. It thrived in a society that viewed the spirit realm as superior to earthly reality. Doherty cites early Christian writers who wrote as if Jesus were entirely in the spirit realm, others who wrote as if it didn't matter. After a few hundred years, Christians developed an orthodoxy, which said that Jesus was a real person. I am writing from what I remember without researching this. If you want the technical details, go to Doherty's web site. I don't expect you to believe - you are committed to your view of history, in which a few fragmentary scraps of literary evidence are translated into historical certainty that there was a real person named Jesus. You are entitled to your views, and I have no need to change your mind on this - we live in a free country (so far). |
04-17-2001, 06:52 AM | #18 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Hardly the powerful king that myth-makers would create to inspire people to follow. |
|
04-17-2001, 11:19 AM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If the virgin-birth story does not make one suspicious of the Gospels as history, then what will? Simply check out
http://www.secularhumanism.org/libra...price_20_1.htm Jesus Christ fits Lord Raglan's mythic-hero profile *very* well. As to being humble, considering oneself the Messiah is not what one would normally consider humility. If I claimed that I was the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, would you consider me very humble? And I note that the Buddha was described as even more humble than JC in some ways; he was described as the son of a great king who turned his back on his old life as a would-be future king to find out why people suffer. And all through his quest, he never called himself a messiah or a good. |
04-17-2001, 11:33 AM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
lpetrich
Are you going to answer our questions on this thread? Thanks, Nomad |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|