![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Beloved Deceased 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2001 
				Location: Cocoa Beach, FL 
				
				
					Posts: 864
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Genesis 1:14 - 1:16 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. If this last verse were so, what about the time there is no visible moon. And then how does one explain the fact that the moon is not a source of light at all but is simply a relfection? Any ideas?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2001 
				Location: Heaven, just assasinated god 
				
				
					Posts: 578
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Well even with the absence of the moon, it is still not 100% pitch black darkness. You can still see around you & make out things. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Unless you're in a forest with a very thick canopy, then maybe you'll get 100% pitch black darkness where you can't even see your hands raise right infront of your face.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah 
				
				
					Posts: 1,945
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Beloved Deceased 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2001 
				Location: Cocoa Beach, FL 
				
				
					Posts: 864
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			devnet 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	You made that shit up, right? If not, then how do the sensible people disassociate their fables from other mythologies? Stan the confused beachbum  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2001 
				Location: West Virginia 
				
				
					Posts: 160
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			devnet - are you the loneliest person in isreal?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | ||
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah 
				
				
					Posts: 1,945
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 No, I did not make that shit up. It's written black on white from right to left in the Jewish Aggadah, the "sayings" commentary on the Torah which every Orthodox Jew gets to learn sometime. And I, as a former Orthodox Jewish fundamentalist, learnt it too. There's many more fanciful stories where that came from, such as the story of how the lion became the king of the animals by parading the other animals into Noah's ark. Child fables, certainly, but they're studied aplenty in the yeshivas. Quote: 
	
 The Jewish Aggadah is a set of midrashim, of commentaries, composed ad-hoc to explain things which are not explained to the full in the text of the Torah.  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah 
				
				
					Posts: 1,945
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I am lonely in my social life (I wish I had a GF to love), but I don't think the superlative "loneliest" is appropriate. I'm just about as lonely as any hi-tech worker could be. btw, what's all this psychoanalysis in aid of? Doesn't seem to be of much use for the debate on the Bible, I suppose...  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2000 
				Location: Middlesbrough, England 
				
				
					Posts: 3,909
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 First the two lights of the Genesis era. This is cahracterised by being static and displaying no refractive properties. The next two lights were after the flood, which had speed and could refract to create rainbows.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2001 
				Location: Here 
				
				
					Posts: 234
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Geeze Louise! These are myths, stories and midrash on ancient creation tales from the Ur-memory of mankind. You wouldn't want to myth this for the world....  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |