FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > History of Abrahamic Religions & Related Texts
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 01:23 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2013, 07:37 PM   #371
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

From Hom. Od. 10.64 at perseus

πῶς ἦλθες, Ὀδυσεῦ; τίς τοι κακὸς ἔχραε δαίμων;

I am guessing this is a translation of the above:

http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.10.x.html

'Ulysses, what brings you here? What god has been ill-treating you? http://poetryintranslation.com/PITBR.../Odyssey10.htm

“Odysseus, how do you come to be here? What cruel god opposed you?


In any event does not κακὸς qualify δαίμων as bad or evil or cruel?
It describes what type of δαίμων Aeolus thinks has beset Odysseus when Odysseus unexpectedly comes back to Aeolus.
What? The term κακὸς means bad.
The term δαίμων itself is not bad.




Quote:
It testifies to the fact that you keep refusing to acknowledge that as far back as Homer a δαίμων was used with reference to an "evil spirit".
APPLE = APPLE

GOOD + APPLE = Good Apple

BAD + APPLE = Bad Apple.

It does not matter which language underlies this stuff.
Tell me, Pete. When you say "that's a bad apple" are you making the apple something it wasn't (bad) before you applied the adjective to it or are you are telling someone (and, unless you are lying, accurately describing) what you already know (or have come to know) the apple in itself is? Why apply the adjective "bad" to apple if it is not fitting to do so?
The adjective provides context to distinguish both good and bad apples. I do not dispute the fact that some sources explicitly provide such context, such as Homer. What concerns the OP is that after the rise of Christianity, the apples become invariably bad apples.

Here is an extract from Where did Christianity get the idea of demons ?

Quote:

... ancient culture had several other complicated and contradictory ideas about demons. Back then, demons were a big deal. Even Plato had a theory of demons.

The Greek word was δαίμων, which English-letterates as "daimon."

How daimon translates depends on context.

Sometimes daimon meant "God," as in one of the top rank Olympian Gods. In the New Testament book Acts 17:18, Jesus is called a demon. Sometimes daimon is "demi-god," or "divinity," sometimes it's "guardian spirit". Lucky people were "eu-daimon," well-demoned. Unlucky people were "kako-daimon," bad-demoned. Sometimes daimon was the soul of the dead, sometimes it was a folk-religion magical being—and some of those folk-religion beings are the evil spirit you have in mind when you hear "demon."

///

We do have time for enough ancient evidence for you to see that Pagans had demons, Christians had demons; and that Pagans had demons first, Christians had demons second.
The author of this page also makes the claim that
Quote:
In the New Testament book Acts 17:18, Jesus is called a demon.
Someone disagreed with this, and stated "All texts basically refer to him as a caller of demons" (See the note)

This page goes on to outline uses of the term by the pagans and Christians ...

Quote:

You now know Pagans had demons. Pagan demons could live inside people, and make them crazy. Pagan demons could be spotted by divine men. Pagan demons could tell when they'd be spotted by a divine men. Pagan demons talked to divine men. Divine men commanded Pagan demons to leave the body of the people they inhabited. And the Pagan demons left. Performing a little miracle on the way out.

You also know Pagans Christians had demons. Pagans Christian demons could live inside people, and make them crazy. Pagans Christian demons could be spotted by divine men. Pagans Christian demons could tell when they'd be spotted by a divine men. Pagans Christian demons talked to divine men. Divine men commanded Pagans Christian demons to leave the body of the people they inhabited. And the Pagans Christian demons left. Performing a little miracle on the way out.





εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 07:47 PM   #372
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

From Hom. Od. 10.64 at perseus

πῶς ἦλθες, Ὀδυσεῦ; τίς τοι κακὸς ἔχραε δαίμων;

I am guessing this is a translation of the above:

http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.10.x.html

'Ulysses, what brings you here? What god has been ill-treating you? http://poetryintranslation.com/PITBR.../Odyssey10.htm

“Odysseus, how do you come to be here? What cruel god opposed you?


In any event does not κακὸς qualify δαίμων as bad or evil or cruel?
It describes what type of δαίμων Aeolus thinks has beset Odysseus when Odysseus unexpectedly comes back to Aeolus.
What? The term κακὸς means bad.
The term δαίμων itself is not bad.




Quote:
It testifies to the fact that you keep refusing to acknowledge that as far back as Homer a δαίμων was used with reference to an "evil spirit".
APPLE = APPLE

GOOD + APPLE = Good Apple

BAD + APPLE = Bad Apple.

It does not matter which language underlies this stuff.
Tell me, Pete. When you say "that's a bad apple" are you making the apple something it wasn't (bad) before you applied the adjective to it or are you are telling someone (and, unless you are lying, accurately describing) what you already know (or have come to know) the apple in itself is? Why apply the adjective "bad" to apple if it is not fitting to do so?
The adjective provides context to distinguish both good and bad apples.
Ah, is that what it does!

Quote:
I do not dispute the fact that some sources explicitly provide such context, such as Homer. What concerns the OP is that after the rise of Christianity,
After the 4th century, yes?

Quote:
the apples become invariably bad apples.
Invariably? And your evidence from primary sources for this is what?

Here's a list of the use by 3rd-5th century pagan and Christian authors of the nominative singular of δαίμων and of δαιμόνιον.

Can you state categorically, Pete, that the meaning that these words have in these instances -- or even just in the ones from Christian authors -- is always (invariably) "evil spirit"?

Search for: daimwn
Allowable interval between words: Exact phrase
-----------------------------------------
Diogenes Laertius Biogr. 001: 1
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr 002: 1
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr 009: 3
Triphiodorus Epic. et Gram 001: 1
Heliodorus Scr. Erot. 001: 16
Eutecnius Soph. 005: 1
Plotinus Phil. 001: 23
Iamblichus Phil. 001: 1
Iamblichus Phil. 006: 16
Porphyrius Phil. 003: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 005: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 008: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 009: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 011: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 012: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 013: 2
Porphyrius Phil. 014: 4
Porphyrius Phil. 018: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 023: 1
Acta Thomae 001: 7
Acta Thomae 004: 1
Gregorius Thaumaturgus Scr 009: 1
Hippolytus Scr. Eccl. 010: 2
Hippolytus Scr. Eccl. 028: 1
Acta Xanthippae Et Polyxena 001: 2
Manetho Astrol. 001: 1
Menander Rhet. 002: 2
Testamentum Salomonis 001: 21
Testamentum Salomonis 003: 1
Testamentum Salomonis 010: 13
Zosimus Alchem. 001: 2
Zosimus Alchem. 049: 2

Oribasius Med. 004: 1
Adamantius Judaeus Med. 001: 1
Nemesius Theol. 001: 1
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 022: 4
Flavius Claudius Julianus 003: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 004: 2
Flavius Claudius Julianus 007: 2
Flavius Claudius Julianus 009: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 010: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 011: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 012: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 013: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 017: 1
Martyrium Pionii 001: 1
Synesius Phil. 001: 9
Synesius Phil. 003: 1
Synesius Phil. 005: 2
Synesius Phil. 010: 3
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 033: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 053: 2
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 069: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 084: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 001: 17
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 002: 4
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 005: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 017: 1
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 019: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 020: 4
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 022: 1
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 034: 1
Theodosius Gramm. 003: 1
Theodosius Gramm. 006: 2
Epiphanius Scr. Eccl. 002: 2
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 037: 1
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 059: 3
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 060: 5
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 061: 4
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 062: 4
Sopater Rhet. 001: 7
Athanasius Theol. 002: 3
Athanasius Theol. 011: 1
Athanasius Theol. 026: 1
Athanasius Theol. 037: 1
Athanasius Theol. 041: 1
Athanasius Theol. 047: 7
Athanasius Theol. 061: 2
Athanasius Theol. 071: 1
Athanasius Theol. 075: 1
Athanasius Theol. 077: 2
Athanasius Theol. 085: 2
Basilius Theol. 001: 2
Basilius Theol. 004: 2
Basilius Theol. 009: 1
Basilius Theol. 030: 1
Basilius Theol. 038: 1
Basilius Theol. 058: 1
Hephaestion Astrol. 001: 2
Quintus Epic. 001: 16
Eunapius Hist. et Soph. 001: 1
Eunapius Hist. et Soph. 002: 1
Himerius Soph. 001: 7
Paulus Astrol. 001: 6
Socrates Scholasticus Hist 001: 4
Philostorgius Scr. Eccl. 002: 1
Asterius Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Asterius Sophista Scr. Ecc 001: 2

Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 003: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 006: 5
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 012: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 015: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 021: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 022: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 023: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 024: 7
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 026: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 035: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 040: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 041: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 060: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 061: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 067: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 086: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 087: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 088: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 101: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 103: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 108: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 112: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 115: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 142: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 143: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 152: 19
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 153: 5
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 154: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 155: 5
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 156: 13
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 157: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 158: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 159: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 161: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 162: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 164: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 168: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 172: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 184: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 197: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 206: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 213: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 217: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 230: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 249: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 291: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 303: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 320: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 337: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 338: 8
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 373: 13
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 378: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 382: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 486: 1


Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 498: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 505: 1
Apollinaris Theol. 037: 1
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 042: 3
Pseudo-Macarius Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Pseudo-Macarius Scr. Eccl. 002: 1
Pseudo-Macarius Scr. Eccl. 011: 2
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 002: 2
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 003: 6
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 011: 2
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 001: 22
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 004: 4
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 005: 1
Arcadius Gramm. 001: 2
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 001: 21
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 004: 18
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 005: 19
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 006: 6
Pseudo-Polemon 001: 1
Eusebius Phil. 001: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 001: 4
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 003: 5
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 004: 4
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 008: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 016: 3
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 030: 2
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 031: 9
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 033: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 032: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 103: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 176: 5
Julianus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 001: 7
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 010: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 017: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 020: 8
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 022: 7
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 024: 3
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 001: 17
Theodorus Scr. Eccl. 002: 2
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 006: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 035: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 036: 7
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 037: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 044: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 123: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 132: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 134: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 156: 1
Severianus Scr. Eccl. 038: 3
Severianus Scr. Eccl. 040: 1
Joannes Stobaeus Anthologus 001: 36


Nonnus Epic. 002: 2
Salaminius Hermias Sozomenu 001: 1
Hermias Phil. 001: 9
Olympiodorus Alchem. 001: 2
Orion Gramm. 001: 4
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 004: 2
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 005: 1
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 008: 1
Historia Monachorum In Aegy 001: 3
Eudocia Augusta Poeta 001: 5
Eudocia Augusta Poeta 002: 1
Callinicus Biogr. 001: 10
Hesychius Scr. Eccl. 039: 1
Basilius Scr. Eccl. 002: 10
Basilius Scr. Eccl. 018: 3
Marcus Diaconus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Joannes Malalas Chronogr. 001: 1
Joannes Malalas Chronogr. 003: 1
Leontius Scr. Eccl. 011: 1
Aristaenetus Epist. 001: 1
Ammonius Phil. 001: 1
Proclus Phil. 001: 28
Proclus Phil. 007: 48
Proclus Phil. 008: 1
Proclus Phil. 009: 3
Proclus Phil. 010: 10
Proclus Phil. 015: 1
Damascius Phil. 003: 1
Damascius Phil. 004: 3
Damascius Phil. 005: 3
Damascius Phil. 007: 1
Damascius Phil. 008: 4
Zosimus Hist. 001: 2
Hesychius Lexicogr. 002: 10
Hesychius Lexicogr. 003: 4



Search for: daimonion

Diogenes Laertius Biogr. 001: 2
Heliodorus Scr. Erot. 001: 4
Eutecnius Soph. 003: 1
Plotinus Phil. 001: 2
Iamblichus Phil. 001: 4
Iamblichus Phil. 006: 7
Porphyrius Phil. 003: 5
Publius Herennius Dexippus 003: 1
Cassius Longinus Phil. et 001: 1
Testamentum Salomonis 001: 8
Testamentum Salomonis 005: 1
Testamentum Salomonis 007: 8
Testamentum Salomonis 010: 10
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 002: 1
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 024: 1
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 041: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 003: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 007: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 008: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 013: 3
Synesius Phil. 001: 2
Synesius Phil. 003: 1
Synesius Phil. 006: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 018: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 030: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 032: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 069: 6
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 084: 5
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 001: 6
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 002: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 005: 2
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 017: 1
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 034: 3
Theodosius Gramm. 003: 1
Epiphanius Scr. Eccl. 002: 4
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 006: 1
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 060: 1
Sopater Rhet. 001: 5
Athanasius Theol. 026: 2
Athanasius Theol. 044: 2
Athanasius Theol. 061: 2
Athanasius Theol. 071: 1
Athanasius Theol. 078: 1
Athanasius Theol. 104: 1
Basilius Theol. 003: 1
Basilius Theol. 026: 1
Basilius Theol. 038: 1
Basilius Theol. 051: 1
Basilius Theol. 064: 2
Eunapius Hist. et Soph. 001: 2
Himerius Soph. 001: 1
Socrates Scholasticus Hist 001: 3
Asterius Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Asterius Sophista Scr. Ecc 001: 1


Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 012: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 015: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 018: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 079: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 088: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 113: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 120: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 140: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 143: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 152: 8
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 153: 29
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 154: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 155: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 159: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 168: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 187: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 205: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 275: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 284: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 338: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 370: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 376: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 382: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 491: 2
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 018: 1
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 020: 2
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 021: 2
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 043: 2
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 001: 3
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 004: 2
Amphilochius Scr. Eccl. 011: 1
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 001: 3
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 004: 4
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 005: 13
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 006: 2
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 001: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 002: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 024: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 001: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 002: 22
Cyrillus Theol. 029: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 031: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 032: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 097: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 100: 5
Cyrillus Theol. 103: 9
Cyrillus Theol. 104: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 108: 4
Julianus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 022: 1
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 001: 8
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 022: 1


Cyrillus Theol. 001: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 002: 22
Cyrillus Theol. 029: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 031: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 032: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 097: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 100: 5
Cyrillus Theol. 103: 9
Cyrillus Theol. 104: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 108: 4
Julianus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 022: 1
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 001: 8
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 022: 1
Theodorus Scr. Eccl. 004: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 001: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 036: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 044: 1
Joannes Stobaeus Anthologu 001: 15
Nonnus Epic. 001: 1
Nonnus Epic. 002: 1
Salaminius Hermias Sozomenu 001: 4
Hermias Phil. 001: 17
Olympiodorus Alchem. 001: 1
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 004: 5
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 005: 3
Callinicus Biogr. 001: 2
Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita 004: 2
Basilius Scr. Eccl. 018: 1
Leontius Scr. Eccl. 011: 2
Proclus Phil. 001: 36
Proclus Phil. 004: 1
Proclus Phil. 007: 32
Proclus Phil. 008: 2
Proclus Phil. 009: 1
Proclus Phil. 010: 19
Damascius Phil. 003: 2
Damascius Phil. 004: 1
Damascius Phil. 005: 2
Damascius Phil. 007: 3
Damascius Phil. 008: 5
Hesychius Lexicogr. 002: 1
Hesychius Lexicogr. 003: 1
Dionysius Soph. 001: 1

Quote:
Here is an extract from Where did Christianity get the idea of demons ?
Boy are you getting desperate! And I note with interest how you seem to have ignored the fact that what is stated on this page falsies your claim about the use of δαίμων with the meaning of "evil spirit" is a Christian invention. More evidence that you misread and misinterpret the sources that you adduce to support your claims.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 07:56 PM   #373
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post


What we must do to see if the meaning of a word altered over time is to establish conclusively what its meaning was at given times. And to do this one must take into account the meaning that a word's cognates had at those given times. There is no getting round this. And if you don't do this work, you have no right to claim that you know how any word was used, and what meanings it did or did not bear, before the 4th century.

Sorry, Pete, but you obviously have no idea how a diachronic analysis of the semantic range of a word is carried out.

Below is a list of uses by non Christian Greek authors who wrote between the 3rd century BCE and up to the end of the 2nd century CE of the singular and plural nominative forms of δαίμων and of the singular nominative form of δαιμόνιον. (Note: I have not listed the uses of the singular or plural genitive, dative and accusative or vocative forms of
δαίμων nor of the nominative plural or plural and singualy genitive, dative, and accusative or vocative forms of δαιμόνιον)

The first three numbers beside a name is the TLG catalogue listing of a given author's work. The number after the colon indicates how many times the word listed word is used within that work.

http://www.tlg.uci.edu/authors/cd-rome.php


So .... Are you willing to state categorically, Pete , not only (a) that there is not a single pre CE instance of these uses that bears the meaning "evil spirit", but also (b) that it is not true that what ever may have been true in the Classical period, by the Hellenistic age, the meaning "evil spirit" for the terms had not become predominant,, contra what seems to be indicated in Philostratus's uses of δαίμων ?

Do you know?

Of course Jeffrey I cannot say that I know.
But I am prepared to investigate the matter.

Thanks for this most interesting survey ....


Quote:

****
Search for: daimwn
3BCE-1CE

Apollonius Rhodius Epic. 001: 6
Euphorion Epic. 001: 1
Nicomachus Trag. 001: 1
Theognetus Comic. 001: 1
Theognetus Comic. 002: 1
Cercidas Iamb. 001: 2
Chrysippus Phil. 001: 1
Chrysippus Phil. 002: 1
Hieronymus Phil. 001: 2
[Onatas] Phil. 001: 1
[Pempelus] Phil. 001: 1
Timaeus Phil. 001: 1
Choliambica Adespota (ALG) 001: 1
Moschus Bucol. 004: 1
Posidonius Phil. 001: 3
Oracula Sibyllina 001: 1
Philo Judaeus Phil. 027: 1
Diodorus Siculus Hist. 003: 1
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 001: 9
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 006: 4
Isidorus Scriptor Hymnorum 001: 1
Nicolaus Hist. 003: 1
Tryphon I Gramm. 002: 1
[Demetrius] Rhet. 001: 1
Aristonicus Gramm. 001: 2
Aristonicus Gramm. 002: 2
Dorotheus Astrol. 001: 1
Philoxenus Gramm. 001: 2


Philoxenus Gramm. 001: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 002: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 005: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 007: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 010: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 011: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 019: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 033: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 036: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 039: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 042: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 045: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 048: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 050: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 051: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 054: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 058: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 060: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 061: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 070: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 076: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 079: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 084: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 086: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 087: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 089: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 092: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 094: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 096: 3
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 107: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 113: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 133: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 137: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 141: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 145: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 146: 2
Flavius Arrianus Hist. et 001: 1
Flavius Josephus Hist. 001: 2
Flavius Josephus Hist. 004: 2
Appianus Hist. 009: 1
Appianus Hist. 011: 1
Appianus Hist. 017: 2
Epictetus Phil. 001: 1
Dio Chrysostomus Soph. 001: 10
Lucius Annaeus Cornutus Ph 002: 1
Dioscorides Pedanius Med. 003: 1
Dioscorides Pedanius Med. 004: 1
Apion Gramm. 003: 6
Apollonius Soph. 001: 3
[Cebes] Phil. 001: 1
Harpocration Gramm. 001: 1
Cyranides 001: 6
Teucer Astrol. 001: 1


Search for: daimwn
Century: CE. 2
Athenaeus Soph.: 14
Oppianus Epic.: 3
Pseudo-Lucianus Soph.: 6
Lucianus Soph.: 8
Apollonius Dyscolus Gramm.: 4
Dionysius Perieg.: 3
Aelius Herodianus et Pseud: 20
Pseudo-Plutarchus: 1
Diogenianus Gramm.: 3
Zenobius Sophista [Paroem: 4
Aelius Aristides Rhet.: 11
Acta Joannis: 2
Claudius Ptolemaeus Math.: 1
Cassius Dio Hist.: 7
Pausanias Perieg.: 22
Achilles Tatius Scr. Erot.: 6
Sextus Empiricus Phil.: 4
Claudius Aelianus Soph.: 2
Chariton Scr. Erot.: 9
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus : 4
Maximus Soph.: 6
Valerius Babrius Scr. Fab.: 2
Flavius Philostratus Soph.: 6
Alciphron Rhet. et Soph.: 4
Xenophon Scr. Erot.: 2
Antoninus Liberalis Myth.: 1
Alexander Phil.: 5
Athenagoras Apol.: 2
Celsus Phil.: 4
Corpus Hermeticum: 11
Numenius Phil.: 1
Pausanias Attic.: 3
Philostratus Major Soph.: 3
Phrynichus Attic.: 3
Sententiae Sexti: 2
Sententiae Pythagoreorum: 1
Vettius Valens Astrol.: 33
Antenor Hist.: 1
Sextus Julius Africanus Hi: 2

Search for: daimones
Century 3BCE-1CE
Apollonius Rhodius Epic. 001: 3
Cercidas Iamb. 001: 1
Chrysippus Phil. 001: 1
Silenus Hist. 003: 1
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 001: 7
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 006: 1
Strabo Geogr. 001: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 001: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 084: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 090: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 092: 4
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 096: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 108: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 109: 4
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 110: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 120: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 126: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 145: 1
Novum Testamentum 001: 1
Flavius Josephus Hist. 004: 3
Appianus Hist. 009: 1
Epictetus Phil. 001: 1
Aelius Theon Rhet. 001: 1
Dio Chrysostomus Soph. 001: 1
Apollonius Phil. 001: 3
Apollonius Phil. 002: 3
Apion Gramm. 004: 2
Apocalypsis Adam 001: 3
Apollonius Soph. 001: 1
-----------------------------------------



Search for: daimones
-----------------------------------------
Century: CE. 2
Athenaeus Soph.: 2
Oppianus Epic.: 5
Oppianus Epic.: 1
Galenus Med.: 1
Pseudo-Lucianus Soph.: 1
Lucianus Soph.: 1
Aelius Herodianus et Pseud: 5
Aelius Aristides Rhet.: 4
Nicomachus Math.: 1
Cassius Dio Hist.: 1
Achilles Tatius Scr. Erot.: 1
Julius Pollux Gramm.: 2
Sextus Empiricus Phil.: 1
Claudius Aelianus Soph.: 1
Artemidorus Onir.: 3
Clemens Alexandrinus Theol: 17
Maximus Soph.: 1
Hermogenes Rhet.: 1
Flavius Philostratus Soph.: 2
Alciphron Rhet. et Soph.: 3
Albinus Phil.: 1
Alexander Phil.: 1
Apocalypsis Joannis: 1
Athenagoras Apol.: 5
Celsus Phil.: 2
Corpus Hermeticum: 5
Aelius Dionysius Attic.: 1
Hephaestion Gramm.: 2
Oracula Chaldaica: 1
Pausanias Attic.: 1
Philostratus Major Soph.: 1
Seniores Alexandrini Scr. : 1
Sententiae Sexti: 3
Theophilus Apol.: 1


Search for: daimonion

Century 3BCE-1CE
-----------------------------------------
Euphorion Epic. 002: 1
Polybius Hist. 001: 2
Bion Phil. 001: 1
Chrysippus Phil. 001: 1
[Onatas] Phil. 001: 2
[Phintys] Phil. 001: 1
Quintus Fabius Pictor Hist 003: 1
Promathion Hist. 002: 1
Posidonius Phil. 001: 8
Posidonius Phil. 003: 4
Diogenes Phil. 001: 1
Diodorus Siculus Hist. 001: 14
Diodorus Siculus Hist. 003: 10
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 001: 24
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 006: 1
Dionysius Halicarnassensis 012: 1
Nicolaus Hist. 003: 2
Philodemus Phil. 107: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 001: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 002: 3
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 004: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 005: 4
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 008: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 012: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 013: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 016: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 018: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 019: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 030: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 031: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 033: 4
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 037: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 038: 4
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 041: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 042: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 044: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 047: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 048: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 055: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 060: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 065: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 080: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 082: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 083: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 092: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 107: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 108: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 109: 22
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 110: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 113: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 118: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 123: 1
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 133: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 139: 2
Plutarchus Biogr. et Phil. 145: 1
Flavius Arrianus Hist. et 001: 2
Flavius Josephus Hist. 001: 5
Flavius Josephus Hist. 003: 1
Flavius Josephus Hist. 004: 10
Flavius Josephus Hist. 004: 10
Appianus Hist. 007: 1
Appianus Hist. 009: 2
Appianus Hist. 011: 1
Appianus Hist. 013: 3
Appianus Hist. 017: 7
Epictetus Phil. 001: 1
[Longinus] Rhet. 001: 1
Dio Chrysostomus Soph. 001: 17
Apollonius Phil. 003: 1
Onasander Tact. 001: 1
Thessalus Astrol. et Med. 004: 1
[Cebes] Phil. 001: 5
Evangelium Secundum Hebraeo 001: 1
Heraclitus Phil. 001: 1: 1
Cyranides 001: 1
Pseudo-Phocylides Gnom. 001: 1
Thrasyllus Hist. 002: 1


Search for: daimonion
Search authors in the first century they wrote
Allowable interval between words: Exact phrase
-----------------------------------------
Century: A.D. 2
Athenaeus Soph.: 11
Phalaridis Epistulae: 1
Pseudo-Lucianus Soph.: 2
Lucianus Soph.: 1
Aelius Herodianus et Pseud: 1
Pseudo-Plutarchus: 1
Diogenianus Gramm.: 3
Zenobius Sophista [Paroem: 2
Aelius Aristides Rhet.: 4
Cassius Dio Hist.: 43
Pausanias Perieg.: 2
Julius Pollux Gramm.: 2
Sextus Empiricus Phil.: 1
Claudius Aelianus Soph.: 3
Artemidorus Onir.: 1
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus : 1
Maximus Soph.: 17
Hermogenes Rhet.: 2
Aspasius Phil.: 1
Flavius Philostratus Soph.: 5
Justinus Martyr Apol.: 1
Alexander Phil.: 1
Anonymi Commentarius In Pla: 2
Celsus Phil.: 1
Hierocles Phil.: 1
Vettius Valens Astrol.: 2
-----------------------------------------

Some preliminary comments:

(1) It would seem that a study of Plutarch's use of the term would be a good idea considering his extensive use. There are a number of articles that I have found in this regard, which I will read with interest in the next few days.

(2) Where precisely does your survey finish chronologically? I can see that Philostratus is mentioned but there seems to be the omission of Plotinus. If you recall, I think that the full survey should be extended to the end of the 4th century at which time we have for the first time a NT canon, despite the changes between (say) 4th century Greek bible codices (such as Vaticanus) and the Greek TR used by the translators of the KJV.

Here is a very interesting article ON THE DEMONOLOGY OF PLOTINUS

Quote:
It is a common fact that the impact of the philosophy of Plotinus (204/5 - 270) *1 on the Eastern and Western philosophy as well as to the Christian theology *2 has been immense. Considering that it seems paradoxical that the philosophy of Plotinus has been undertaken systematically and perhaps even comprehensive in the last 20 years only. During this short period of time more research papers have been written about him than during the whole one and a half millennium following his death. The flow broke loose after the final completion of the new text-critical 3-volumed issue of Plotinus' Enneads by Paul Henry and Hans-Rudolph Schwyzer (1973) *3, which is "undoubtedly the most important contribution to Plotinian scholarship since Porphyry published the Enneads" *4 and which has been called with a certain specific hauteur the first scientific edition of Plotinus' works *5. The Lexicon Plotinianum (1980) *6 compiled by John Sleeman and Gilbert Pollet has contributed to the study of Plotinus likewise.


All 54 treatises of Plotinus have not attracted equal attention. Some treatises have been constantly reissued with new comments attached, and quite frequently two separate commentaries are issued concurrently. At the same time, there are a small number of treatises that have attracted little or no attention at all, not to mention the republications with comments *7.

One of such 'unnoticed' ones is the 4th treatise of the III Ennead (15th in the chronological order), entitled (by Plotinus' disciple Porphyry):



Greek ("On our allotted guardian spirit")

The treatise has been quoted in several contexts, its main theme - Plotinus' treatment of daimon *8 - however, has been rarely mentioned.

But bearing in mind the comprehension of the philosophical and religious demonology prevailing during the first three centuries BC, as it was formulated by Martin Nilsson in his monograph Geschichte der griechischen Religion *9, the treatment of daimon by Plotinus appears highly unique as compared to the contemporary multicolored, yet one-sided demonology.

Thanks again for this survey Jeffrey.






εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 08:23 PM   #374
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post


What we must do to see if the meaning of a word altered over time is to establish conclusively what its meaning was at given times. And to do this one must take into account the meaning that a word's cognates had at those given times. There is no getting round this. And if you don't do this work, you have no right to claim that you know how any word was used, and what meanings it did or did not bear, before the 4th century.

Sorry, Pete, but you obviously have no idea how a diachronic analysis of the semantic range of a word is carried out.

Below is a list of uses by non Christian Greek authors who wrote between the 3rd century BCE and up to the end of the 2nd century CE of the singular and plural nominative forms of δαίμων and of the singular nominative form of δαιμόνιον. (Note: I have not listed the uses of the singular or plural genitive, dative and accusative or vocative forms of
δαίμων nor of the nominative plural or plural and singualy genitive, dative, and accusative or vocative forms of δαιμόνιον)

The first three numbers beside a name is the TLG catalogue listing of a given author's work. The number after the colon indicates how many times the word listed word is used within that work.

http://www.tlg.uci.edu/authors/cd-rome.php


So .... Are you willing to state categorically, Pete , not only (a) that there is not a single pre CE instance of these uses that bears the meaning "evil spirit", but also (b) that it is not true that what ever may have been true in the Classical period, by the Hellenistic age, the meaning "evil spirit" for the terms had not become predominant,, contra what seems to be indicated in Philostratus's uses of δαίμων ?

Do you know?

Quote:
Of course Jeffrey I cannot say that I know.
Except that that's exactly what you did say in the OP.


Quote:
But I am prepared to investigate the matter.
How if you don't read Greek?

Quote:
(2) Where precisely does your survey finish chronologically?
As can be seen if you read the list carefully, and also in what I said regarding when the list begins and ends, at the end of the second century CE.

Quote:
I can see that Philostratus is mentioned but there seems to be the omission of Plotinus.
Yes, because he is 3rd century.

Quote:
If you recall, I think that the full survey should be extended to the end of the 4th century at which time we have for the first time a NT canon, despite the changes between (say) 4th century Greek bible codices (such as Vaticanus) and the Greek TR used by the translators of the KJV.
Do we not have witnesses to Matthew before that?

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 08:26 PM   #375
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
...


The author of this page also makes the claim that
Quote:
In the New Testament book Acts 17:18, Jesus is called a demon.

Someone disagreed with this, and stated "All texts basically refer to him as a caller of demons" (See the note)
In the text, the author of the Book of Acts claims that pagan philosphers said of Paul that he was calling up foreign gods or demons, meaning Jesus.
Young's Literal Translation
And certain of the Epicurean and of the Stoic philosophers, were meeting together to see him, and some were saying, 'What would this seed picker [i.e. Paul] wish to say?' and others, 'Of strange demons he doth seem to be an announcer;' because Jesus and the rising again he did proclaim to them as good news,

===OR ===

New International Version (©2011)
A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to debate with him. Some of them asked, "What is this babbler trying to say?" Others remarked, "He seems to be advocating foreign gods." They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.
The term in question is


Xenōn daimoniōn
Ξένων δαιμονίων
Of foreign gods


I'm not sure how this helps your case. It looks like you have found a positive or neutral use of the term daimon in Christian literature.

Or how this helps it:

Quote:
This page goes on to outline uses of the term by the pagans and Christians ...

Quote:

You now know Pagans had demons. Pagan demons could live inside people, and make them crazy. Pagan demons could be spotted by divine men. Pagan demons could tell when they'd be spotted by a divine men. Pagan demons talked to divine men. Divine men commanded Pagan demons to leave the body of the people they inhabited. And the Pagan demons left. Performing a little miracle on the way out.

You also know Pagans Christians had demons. Pagans Christian demons could live inside people, and make them crazy. Pagans Christian demons could be spotted by divine men. Pagans Christian demons could tell when they'd be spotted by a divine men. Pagans Christian demons talked to divine men. Divine men commanded Pagans Christian demons to leave the body of the people they inhabited. And the Pagans Christian demons left. Performing a little miracle on the way out.
The whole point of this website is to show that Christians were part of their culture and took ideas from wherever they found them.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 10:09 PM   #376
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

I do not dispute the fact that some sources explicitly provide such context, such as Homer. What concerns the OP is that after the rise of Christianity,
After the 4th century, yes?
NO. Not in this thread.

I have stated again and again, for the purpose of investigating the fate of the Greek "daimon" in antiquity, in this thread I am happy to run with the mainstream hypothesis that the authorship of the canonical new testament was a phenomenom of the first and possibly second centuries of the common era.

Most people accept this hypothesis.

A number of key resources support the claim that there was a shift in the meaning of "daimon" in the common era.

However I actually appreciate what you have set out to do, which is to momentarily disregard the summary positions and plunge into the detailed citations which underpin the summary.

(BTW what I mean by summaries are the LJS entry for δαίμων and the Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. We even see in the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TDNT

In the main the NT follows the OT. There is no reference to the spirits
of the dead. daimnon, which suggests a divine intermediary, is avoided.
Angels and demons are basically antithetical.

...

Demonic powers are reserved for judgement.
Demons are subject to Satan in a kingdom that opposes God's kingdom.
They are thus the instruments of Satan (See Jesus in Mk 3:20ff)






εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 10:27 PM   #377
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
the apples become invariably bad apples.

Invariably? And your evidence from primary sources for this is what?

As advised above, I have obviously relied upon summaries (3 examples provided).

Quote:
Here's a list of the use by 3rd-5th century pagan and Christian authors of the nominative singular of δαίμων and of δαιμόνιον.
There are weeks or months of work in these lists Jeffrey, if I have to arrive back with one or more English translations for each of these Greek instances for the word "daimon".

The TLG is certainly an impressive database.
Thanks for the following ....


Quote:
Can you state categorically, Pete, that the meaning that these words have in these instances -- or even just in the ones from Christian authors -- is always (invariably) "evil spirit"?

NO. Of course I cannot without weeks or months of work which, whether or not it means anything to you, I am prepared to do. A proper study of the claim made in the OP would benefit from such a comprehensive review.

I have not used the TLG database software. Does it include references from these instances to English translations? I'd imagine this would be a manual step.



Quote:
Search for: daimwn
Allowable interval between words: Exact phrase
-----------------------------------------
Diogenes Laertius Biogr. 001: 1
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr 002: 1
Pseudo-Justinus Martyr 009: 3
Triphiodorus Epic. et Gram 001: 1
Heliodorus Scr. Erot. 001: 16
Eutecnius Soph. 005: 1
Plotinus Phil. 001: 23
Iamblichus Phil. 001: 1
Iamblichus Phil. 006: 16
Porphyrius Phil. 003: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 005: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 008: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 009: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 011: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 012: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 013: 2
Porphyrius Phil. 014: 4
Porphyrius Phil. 018: 1
Porphyrius Phil. 023: 1
Acta Thomae 001: 7
Acta Thomae 004: 1
Gregorius Thaumaturgus Scr 009: 1
Hippolytus Scr. Eccl. 010: 2
Hippolytus Scr. Eccl. 028: 1
Acta Xanthippae Et Polyxena 001: 2
Manetho Astrol. 001: 1
Menander Rhet. 002: 2
Testamentum Salomonis 001: 21
Testamentum Salomonis 003: 1
Testamentum Salomonis 010: 13
Zosimus Alchem. 001: 2
Zosimus Alchem. 049: 2

Oribasius Med. 004: 1
Adamantius Judaeus Med. 001: 1
Nemesius Theol. 001: 1
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 022: 4
Flavius Claudius Julianus 003: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 004: 2
Flavius Claudius Julianus 007: 2
Flavius Claudius Julianus 009: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 010: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 011: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 012: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 013: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 017: 1
Martyrium Pionii 001: 1
Synesius Phil. 001: 9
Synesius Phil. 003: 1
Synesius Phil. 005: 2
Synesius Phil. 010: 3
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 033: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 053: 2
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 069: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 084: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 001: 17
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 002: 4
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 005: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 017: 1
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 019: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 020: 4
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 022: 1
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 034: 1
Theodosius Gramm. 003: 1
Theodosius Gramm. 006: 2
Epiphanius Scr. Eccl. 002: 2
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 037: 1
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 059: 3
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 060: 5
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 061: 4
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 062: 4
Sopater Rhet. 001: 7
Athanasius Theol. 002: 3
Athanasius Theol. 011: 1
Athanasius Theol. 026: 1
Athanasius Theol. 037: 1
Athanasius Theol. 041: 1
Athanasius Theol. 047: 7
Athanasius Theol. 061: 2
Athanasius Theol. 071: 1
Athanasius Theol. 075: 1
Athanasius Theol. 077: 2
Athanasius Theol. 085: 2
Basilius Theol. 001: 2
Basilius Theol. 004: 2
Basilius Theol. 009: 1
Basilius Theol. 030: 1
Basilius Theol. 038: 1
Basilius Theol. 058: 1
Hephaestion Astrol. 001: 2
Quintus Epic. 001: 16
Eunapius Hist. et Soph. 001: 1
Eunapius Hist. et Soph. 002: 1
Himerius Soph. 001: 7
Paulus Astrol. 001: 6
Socrates Scholasticus Hist 001: 4
Philostorgius Scr. Eccl. 002: 1
Asterius Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Asterius Sophista Scr. Ecc 001: 2

Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 003: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 006: 5
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 012: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 015: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 021: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 022: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 023: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 024: 7
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 026: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 035: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 040: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 041: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 060: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 061: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 067: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 086: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 087: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 088: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 101: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 103: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 108: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 112: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 115: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 142: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 143: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 152: 19
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 153: 5
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 154: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 155: 5
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 156: 13
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 157: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 158: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 159: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 161: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 162: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 164: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 168: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 172: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 184: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 197: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 206: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 213: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 217: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 230: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 249: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 291: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 303: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 320: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 337: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 338: 8
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 373: 13
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 378: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 382: 4
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 486: 1


Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 498: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 505: 1
Apollinaris Theol. 037: 1
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 042: 3
Pseudo-Macarius Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Pseudo-Macarius Scr. Eccl. 002: 1
Pseudo-Macarius Scr. Eccl. 011: 2
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 002: 2
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 003: 6
Cyrillus Scr. Eccl. 011: 2
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 001: 22
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 004: 4
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 005: 1
Arcadius Gramm. 001: 2
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 001: 21
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 004: 18
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 005: 19
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 006: 6
Pseudo-Polemon 001: 1
Eusebius Phil. 001: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 001: 4
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 003: 5
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 004: 4
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 008: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 016: 3
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 030: 2
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 031: 9
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 033: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 032: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 103: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 176: 5
Julianus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 001: 7
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 010: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 017: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 020: 8
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 022: 7
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 024: 3
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 001: 17
Theodorus Scr. Eccl. 002: 2
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 006: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 035: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 036: 7
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 037: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 044: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 123: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 132: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 134: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 156: 1
Severianus Scr. Eccl. 038: 3
Severianus Scr. Eccl. 040: 1
Joannes Stobaeus Anthologus 001: 36


Nonnus Epic. 002: 2
Salaminius Hermias Sozomenu 001: 1
Hermias Phil. 001: 9
Olympiodorus Alchem. 001: 2
Orion Gramm. 001: 4
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 004: 2
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 005: 1
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 008: 1
Historia Monachorum In Aegy 001: 3
Eudocia Augusta Poeta 001: 5
Eudocia Augusta Poeta 002: 1
Callinicus Biogr. 001: 10
Hesychius Scr. Eccl. 039: 1
Basilius Scr. Eccl. 002: 10
Basilius Scr. Eccl. 018: 3
Marcus Diaconus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Joannes Malalas Chronogr. 001: 1
Joannes Malalas Chronogr. 003: 1
Leontius Scr. Eccl. 011: 1
Aristaenetus Epist. 001: 1
Ammonius Phil. 001: 1
Proclus Phil. 001: 28
Proclus Phil. 007: 48
Proclus Phil. 008: 1
Proclus Phil. 009: 3
Proclus Phil. 010: 10
Proclus Phil. 015: 1
Damascius Phil. 003: 1
Damascius Phil. 004: 3
Damascius Phil. 005: 3
Damascius Phil. 007: 1
Damascius Phil. 008: 4
Zosimus Hist. 001: 2
Hesychius Lexicogr. 002: 10
Hesychius Lexicogr. 003: 4



Search for: daimonion

Diogenes Laertius Biogr. 001: 2
Heliodorus Scr. Erot. 001: 4
Eutecnius Soph. 003: 1
Plotinus Phil. 001: 2
Iamblichus Phil. 001: 4
Iamblichus Phil. 006: 7
Porphyrius Phil. 003: 5
Publius Herennius Dexippus 003: 1
Cassius Longinus Phil. et 001: 1
Testamentum Salomonis 001: 8
Testamentum Salomonis 005: 1
Testamentum Salomonis 007: 8
Testamentum Salomonis 010: 10
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 002: 1
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 024: 1
Themistius Phil. et Rhet. 041: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 003: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 007: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 008: 1
Flavius Claudius Julianus 013: 3
Synesius Phil. 001: 2
Synesius Phil. 003: 1
Synesius Phil. 006: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 018: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 030: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 032: 1
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 069: 6
Gregorius Nyssenus Theol. 084: 5
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 001: 6
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 002: 3
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 005: 2
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 017: 1
Eusebius Scr. Eccl. et The 034: 3
Theodosius Gramm. 003: 1
Epiphanius Scr. Eccl. 002: 4
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 006: 1
Gregorius Nazianzenus Theo 060: 1
Sopater Rhet. 001: 5
Athanasius Theol. 026: 2
Athanasius Theol. 044: 2
Athanasius Theol. 061: 2
Athanasius Theol. 071: 1
Athanasius Theol. 078: 1
Athanasius Theol. 104: 1
Basilius Theol. 003: 1
Basilius Theol. 026: 1
Basilius Theol. 038: 1
Basilius Theol. 051: 1
Basilius Theol. 064: 2
Eunapius Hist. et Soph. 001: 2
Himerius Soph. 001: 1
Socrates Scholasticus Hist 001: 3
Asterius Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Asterius Sophista Scr. Ecc 001: 1


Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 012: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 015: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 018: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 079: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 088: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 113: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 120: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 140: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 143: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 152: 8
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 153: 29
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 154: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 155: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 159: 2
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 168: 3
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 187: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 205: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 275: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 284: 10
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 338: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 370: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 376: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 382: 1
Joannes Chrysostomus Scr. 491: 2
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 018: 1
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 020: 2
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 021: 2
Didymus Caecus Scr. Eccl. 043: 2
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 001: 3
Palladius Scr. Eccl. 004: 2
Amphilochius Scr. Eccl. 011: 1
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 001: 3
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 004: 4
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 005: 13
Libanius Rhet. et Soph. 006: 2
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 001: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 002: 1
Theodoretus Scr. Eccl. et 024: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 001: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 002: 22
Cyrillus Theol. 029: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 031: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 032: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 097: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 100: 5
Cyrillus Theol. 103: 9
Cyrillus Theol. 104: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 108: 4
Julianus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 022: 1
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 001: 8
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 022: 1


Cyrillus Theol. 001: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 002: 22
Cyrillus Theol. 029: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 031: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 032: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 097: 2
Cyrillus Theol. 100: 5
Cyrillus Theol. 103: 9
Cyrillus Theol. 104: 1
Cyrillus Theol. 108: 4
Julianus Scr. Eccl. 001: 1
Evagrius Scr. Eccl. 022: 1
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 001: 8
Eustathius Scr. Eccl. et T 022: 1
Theodorus Scr. Eccl. 004: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 001: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 036: 1
Ephraem Syrus Theol. 044: 1
Joannes Stobaeus Anthologu 001: 15
Nonnus Epic. 001: 1
Nonnus Epic. 002: 1
Salaminius Hermias Sozomenu 001: 4
Hermias Phil. 001: 17
Olympiodorus Alchem. 001: 1
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 004: 5
Procopius Rhet. et Scr. Ec 005: 3
Callinicus Biogr. 001: 2
Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita 004: 2
Basilius Scr. Eccl. 018: 1
Leontius Scr. Eccl. 011: 2
Proclus Phil. 001: 36
Proclus Phil. 004: 1
Proclus Phil. 007: 32
Proclus Phil. 008: 2
Proclus Phil. 009: 1
Proclus Phil. 010: 19
Damascius Phil. 003: 2
Damascius Phil. 004: 1
Damascius Phil. 005: 2
Damascius Phil. 007: 3
Damascius Phil. 008: 5
Hesychius Lexicogr. 002: 1
Hesychius Lexicogr. 003: 1
Dionysius Soph. 001: 1


An amazing list.

Thanks.




εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 10:33 PM   #378
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
The adjective provides context to distinguish both good and bad apples.
Ah, is that what it does!
Jeffrey, your mocking tone here belies the impression that in this thread you have appeared to be in denial of this simple piece of grammar.

Christian demonising of daimons was central to their argument that pagan religion was false.

Pre-Christian daimons need adjectives to show their moral standing.

New Testament daimons don't need adjectives to show their moral standing.

I suspect there are some exceptions involving later archaic Christian use of daimon in the Greek sense, but this change in meaning is the general rule.
Robert Tulip is offline  
Old 04-03-2013, 10:43 PM   #379
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

But I am prepared to investigate the matter.
How if you don't read Greek?

Like the other 99.99% of people on this planet who do not read Greek I shall be forced to rely on examining multiple English translations in the pubic domain.

I suppose another option is to learn Greek. I have entertained the idea. It should not be an impossible task in this age of the internet, but to be realistic I probably cant afford the time.


Quote:
Quote:
(2) Where precisely does your survey finish chronologically?
As can be seen if you read the list carefully, and also in what I said regarding when the list begins and ends, at the end of the second century CE.


Fair enough. It would not then include "Vita Apollonius". I see. Thanks


Quote:
Quote:
I can see that Philostratus is mentioned but there seems to be the omission of Plotinus.
Yes, because he is 3rd century.

Thanks for the confirmation.


BTW is it possible for me to generate these lists if I subscribe or register with TLG
or are these reports only available directly to students and teachers?





εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 06:13 AM   #380
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

BTW is it possible for me to generate these lists if I subscribe or register with TLG
or are these reports only available directly to students and teachers?
It is available to anyone. And you'll not only be able to generate lists. You'll have access to the texts themselves.

And no -- there are no references there to English translations.


Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.