FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > History of Abrahamic Religions & Related Texts
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 01:23 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2013, 01:21 PM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
John Dominick Crossan can see Jesus as a revolutionary peasant, Bart Ehrman as an apocalyptic prophet, James Tabor as a member of a royal dynasty. What would the socioeconomic history of the era do for any of these theories?
Ehrman also claims peasant status.

Socioeconomic status has the possibility to eliminate faulty scholarships based on older models.

Because scholars all have different views on their personal HJ, does not discount the best information we have to reconstruct a HJ using cultural anthropology, which is less open to personal opinion and more fact based from archeology.

Correct?
outhouse is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:37 PM   #62
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
John Dominick Crossan can see Jesus as a revolutionary peasant, Bart Ehrman as an apocalyptic prophet, James Tabor as a member of a royal dynasty. What would the socioeconomic history of the era do for any of these theories?
Ehrman also claims peasant status.
So?

Quote:
Socioeconomic status has the possibility to eliminate faulty scholarships based on older models.
Please explain what older models and "faulty scholarships" you refer to, and exactly how they were eliminated.

Quote:
Because scholars all have different views on their personal HJ, does not discount the best information we have to reconstruct a HJ using cultural anthropology, which is less open to personal opinion and more fact based from archeology.

Correct?
No, not correct. To start off with, your sentence structure is incoherent.

The historical Jesus is not a "personal HJ."

Is there a methodology for reconstructing a putative historical character from cultural anthropology? I don't think so.

And how is this less open to personal opinion or more fact based than archaeology?
Toto is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:52 PM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Getting back to the question of whether Jesus was literate, it seems this is just another case where the issue is how much history the gospels contain.

Is there any reason to think that the story of Jesus reading the Torah in the synagogue is historical? If it is, is there any reason to think that the story that Jesus was a carpenter, or that his followers were fishermen, were historical? Are these stories any more likely to be historically based than the stories about Jesus as a child killing his playmate and bringing him back to life?

Do oppressed peasants start sophisticated new religions, or is that a marxist fantasy?
History is FULL of examples of peasants creating more or less sophistiicated religions or movements. Examples, the many different religious movements of the middles ages that lead to the Albigensian crusades. Manias such as flagellants and others. Oddball movements such as the Brothers of the Free Spirit. During the Hussite wars, various bizarre groups like the Adamites. Jewish messiahs were a dime a dozen in the middles ages and a few of these self proclaimed messiahs had large followings such as Zabbatai Levi. In England we have lots of evidence of various loose movements collectively called the ranters, including mystics, religious skeptics, and odd movements such as the Fifth Monarchy Men. John of Leiden in reformation Germany and on and on. Not to mention similar phenomena of Islam. Many of the more sophisticated religious movements were stamped out by brute force, the Albigensian crusades, the passing of strict blasphemy laws in England to deal with the more dangerous ranters, et al. If you mean succesful religions, we have Socinnians, Anabaptists et al to point to as examples of religious variants of Christiannity that have prospered, more or less. In the Middle East, Alawites, Druze and other religious sects that still exist.

Cheerful Charlie
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 02:28 PM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Only in Mark 6:3, perhaps a late insertion, is Jesus called an artisan. Mt. 13:55 gets it better as "son of the....", and Luke 4:23 calls him Joseph's son--the two contrasting texts indicate that Mark 6:3 is the poorer text. You are presupposing HJ minimalism against the evidence of all four gospels. The very verse you used (as always with you, without citation) is immediately preceded by
Quote:
With the coming of the Sabbath he began teaching in the synagogue, and most of them were astonished when they heard him. They said, "Where did the man get all this? What is this wisdom that has been granted him, and these miracles that are worked through him?"
If you're standing on Mark 6:3 as determinative, do you also accept Mark 6:2 (and backed by Mt. 13:54) that Jesus worked miracles?

As always, you pick and choose what you want to remember, and your memory proves to be pretty bad. Cheerful Charlie has a much better record here than you do.
The gospels et al are not really history, but they make claims that may or may not be true. I merely pointed out the few verses that made claims about literacy of Jesus and his disciples. Some I ignored, the women taken in adultery claims Jesus wrote something in the dirt. But that whole chapter was a late edition, and was added to several various gospels fairly late. We can never know for sure about much of anything historically about the claims of the gospels. Of course if you take the later Christological claims Jesus was merely an aspect of a triune God, Jesus must have been literate and much, much more. And of course it depends on what you mean by literate. Emperor Charlemagne could read, but not really write for example.

All of this points more to the opinions of the gospel writers than to factual history.

Cheerful Charlie
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 03:13 PM   #65
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Please explain what older models and "faulty scholarships" you refer to, and exactly how they were eliminated.

We can look at Martin Hengel's work and see how Strange expands on it here.


http://www.afglc.org/Hellenistic_Sep...Forum_2010.pdf

Quote:
What is it that we can discover
in excavations that tends to test the hypothesis that Martin Hengel articulated?

Quote:
We know far more today about Hellenism, including Hellenism illuminated by
archaeology, than we did forty years ago.

And if you read you will have the answers your looking for.



Not only that, Reed has advanced Stranges view which are even more modern.

There is a evolution of knowledge here, and it you want to look at it like a creationist does with evolution, and then complain about scholarships cant make up their minds the way scientist do regarding evolution.

You mam are sorely mistaken. There is nothing wrong with advancing kowledge through archeology and how it applies to cultural anthropology. And I believe you know this.



Quit attacking the messenger and attack the message, if you have the knowledge.
outhouse is offline  
Old 06-08-2013, 01:46 AM   #66
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Per Reed and Crossan, the Galilean fishermen at this time lived lives below that of the common peasant.
Perhaps I'm missing something. I'm looking at their Excavating Jesus (or via: amazon.co.uk) and I don't see them saying any such thing? What page doesd this claim appear on. If it's elsewhere, what book and what page?

Jeffrey

Found the source.

Nat Geo "Jesus the preacher" 2005

http://channel.nationalgeographic.co...the-preacher1/

Stephan Patterson Professor of new Testament, Eden Theological Seminary.

States, The fisherman disciples were "one rung above a beggar"



Sorry tied him into Crossan and Reed because he is or was a member of the Jesus Seminar.

http://www.eden.edu/Stephen%20J.%20Patterson.aspx



Steve holds membership in the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas, the Society of Biblical Literature, and the North American Patristics Society. He serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Biblical Literature, is Contributing Editor of the Bible Review, and a Fellow of the Jesus Seminar.
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-10-2013, 02:15 PM   #67
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post


Ill find the exact sources from Reed, me and legion debated this about 5 ish months ago in depth, as I debated for a Hellenistic Sepphoris using Stranges models.
I hope this Legion isn't the raging lunatic that goes rabid towards those that aren't as certain as he is about Jesus' existence. I can't remember where I encountered that loser but I hope it wasn't here.
dogsgod is offline  
Old 08-10-2013, 07:20 PM   #68
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Please explain what older models and "faulty scholarships" you refer to, and exactly how they were eliminated.

We can look at Martin Hengel's work and see how Strange expands on it here.


http://www.afglc.org/Hellenistic_Sep...Forum_2010.pdf




Quote:
We know far more today about Hellenism, including Hellenism illuminated by
archaeology, than we did forty years ago.

And if you read you will have the answers your looking for.



Not only that, Reed has advanced Stranges view which are even more modern.

There is a evolution of knowledge here, and it you want to look at it like a creationist does with evolution, and then complain about scholarships cant make up their minds the way scientist do regarding evolution.

You mam are sorely mistaken. There is nothing wrong with advancing kowledge through archeology and how it applies to cultural anthropology. And I believe you know this.



Quit attacking the messenger and attack the message, if you have the knowledge.

No one is attacking the messenger, questions are being asked as to how so and you are not up to answering them, that is your problem.
dogsgod is offline  
Old 08-11-2013, 03:44 PM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post


We can look at Martin Hengel's work and see how Strange expands on it here.


http://www.afglc.org/Hellenistic_Sep...Forum_2010.pdf







And if you read you will have the answers your looking for.



Not only that, Reed has advanced Stranges view which are even more modern.

There is a evolution of knowledge here, and it you want to look at it like a creationist does with evolution, and then complain about scholarships cant make up their minds the way scientist do regarding evolution.

You mam are sorely mistaken. There is nothing wrong with advancing kowledge through archeology and how it applies to cultural anthropology. And I believe you know this.



Quit attacking the messenger and attack the message, if you have the knowledge.

No one is attacking the messenger, questions are being asked as to how so and you are not up to answering them, that is your problem.
My old friend, first actually, from my very start of this hobby from religious education forums.

I supplied sources, and answered the questions.
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-11-2013, 03:47 PM   #70
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsgod View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post


Ill find the exact sources from Reed, me and legion debated this about 5 ish months ago in depth, as I debated for a Hellenistic Sepphoris using Stranges models.
I hope this Legion isn't the raging lunatic that goes rabid towards those that aren't as certain as he is about Jesus' existence. I can't remember where I encountered that loser but I hope it wasn't here.

legion is one of the most well read people I know. He is pretty reasonable to me.

It was here, and RF. All though he doesn't post here anymore.
outhouse is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.