FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2003, 09:04 AM   #91
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

You are right in that it does sound meaningless to you. Scripture has already told us that much....natural man vs spiritual man.

One more thing for you to explain - what is "spiritual man"? As far as I can tell, we're all natural men and women.

But you are wrong that _I_ don't understand what _I_ said.

If you understand it, then you should be able to explain it. Please do.
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-16-2003, 09:08 AM   #92
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Sabine:

No not at all Mageth.....no need to go to those extremes. Did he stone or encourage the stoning of the adultress or did he prevent it? please give me your analysis of why he would have broken that ancestral law by preventing it to be applied.

The scriptures appear quite contradictory on this issue. I have no idea why Jesus in one point says "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven," but in other places appears to break those commandments, and to teach men (and women) to do so.

Please explain the contradiction if you can.
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.