Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-11-2003, 05:32 AM | #22 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the info. I had sort of thought it might be a propelling pencil.
Quote:
Sorry for the red herring, everyone, but I was curious. Keep up the good work with the currency! |
|
07-11-2003, 07:43 AM | #23 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ahhh, I've moved since then....
Posts: 1,729
|
I've past a couple of $5 bills in the St. Louis area. I also use a 'sharpie". I also use a Expo Dry Eraser Marker with a wide felt tip.
Later, ElectEngr |
07-11-2003, 07:52 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 746
|
Never received one
I've never received a bill with the "In God We Trust" marked out, but I've been marking my money every chance I get.
|
07-11-2003, 11:23 AM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: Never received one
Quote:
|
|
07-11-2003, 02:33 PM | #26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
|
Re: Re: Never received one
Quote:
|
|
07-11-2003, 09:08 PM | #27 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: no longer at IIDB
Posts: 1,644
|
I sharpie out IGWT off my money whenever I have a chance to. I prefer to use thick black lines that completely obscure the lettering that's covered up. The rubber stamp of E Pluribus Unum is a good idea... unfortunately, I'm a very poor college student. Maybe when I'm not so horribly broke.
|
07-12-2003, 07:11 AM | #28 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 197
|
"In God We Trust" is not a religious phrase
“The Foundation lawsuit was dismissed by a 10th-circuit federal judge on the grounds that "In God We Trust" is not a religious phrase.”
http://www.scbn.com/america/ingodwetrust.html Wow! I can’t argue with this judge. There is no hope. This judge lost it. Completely. If he/she ever had it. A psychiatrist would say about this judge:”My kind of guy”. (Meaning:”This guy must be my patient”) Remember what Arnold Schwarzenegger’s character said in “Twins”? He said:” You have no respect for logic. I have no respect for people who have no respect for logic.” After this he destroys the guy. I wish he would do the same to this judge. Sweet dreams… But seriously, this judge should be locked in mental institution. He/she is not guilty of his/her ruling by the reason on insanity. |
07-12-2003, 10:01 AM | #29 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Don't be too hard on that judge. His opinion was not logical but was politically astute in its own twisted way.
The judge probably figured that he would be lynched if he struck down IGWT. But there was no way he could take the motto seriously and hold that it was legal under the First Amendment. So he fell back on the "ceremonial Deism" defense, that the phrase is essentially meaningless. Quote:
|
|
07-15-2003, 11:55 PM | #30 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,834
|
It's funny, I picked up on the exact same parts of the ruling as Toto.
Quote:
And this.. Quote:
This is a little confusing though: Quote:
[rant]As an atheist, it actually doesn't bother me all that much in the 'general no specific deity' sense. It's the majority of the religiously affiliated folks who do see it as en endorsment of thier particular brand of religion to say that's it's ok to impose thier backwards, out dated, mythologically retarded sense of right and wrong on me!! If it were just a case of a few atheists who felt bad, I would agree, but it is used by the 'other side' to such a large extent that the motto must go!! [/rant] I don't see how a judge could not see this, but from my observation, most of them are politicians first, and judges second.... -Lane |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|