FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-11-2002, 01:11 PM   #381
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

If anyone still gives a crap (and you really should get a life if you do) about the water-pumping problem: 5 gallons per minute in a 2-inch pipe was too slow for my friction charts. 50 gallons per minute requires 7 horsepower for a 10,000 foot long pipe submerged in Lake Superior or even in Lake Winnepegosis, and it makes absolutely no difference, VZ, whether you are pumping upward or downward. The pipe is submerged. Hydrostatic pressure acts the same inside or outside the pipe. Like it does inside or outside of a fetus.

"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -G. Marx
Coragyps is offline  
Old 11-11-2002, 02:09 PM   #382
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Coragyps:
<strong>If anyone still gives a crap (and you really should get a life if you do) about the water-pumping problem: 5 gallons per minute in a 2-inch pipe was too slow for my friction charts. 50 gallons per minute requires 7 horsepower for a 10,000 foot long pipe submerged in Lake Superior or even in Lake Winnepegosis, and it makes absolutely no difference, VZ, whether you are pumping upward or downward. The pipe is submerged. Hydrostatic pressure acts the same inside or outside the pipe. Like it does inside or outside of a fetus.</strong>
I really don't care what Vanderzyden's opinion on this matter is anymore, but it is good to know that my intuitive idea of what the answer should be was correct.
pz is offline  
Old 11-11-2002, 02:17 PM   #383
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

I have not started my anatomy strand yet, but from what I remember of secondary biology, aren't the valves in the veins an important factor?

Seeing as the blood can not move in reverse, doesn't the pressure pumped along the arteries automatically create the same amount of 'suction' in the veins, because the blood has nowhere to go but toward the heart?
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 11-14-2002, 03:51 AM   #384
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool

Hmm, no replies. Does this mean that Vanderzyden finally admitted to himself that he doesn't understand the physics?
Asha'man is offline  
Old 11-14-2002, 04:27 AM   #385
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Doubting Didymus:
<strong>I have not started my anatomy strand yet, but from what I remember of secondary biology, aren't the valves in the veins an important factor?

Seeing as the blood can not move in reverse, doesn't the pressure pumped along the arteries automatically create the same amount of 'suction' in the veins, because the blood has nowhere to go but toward the heart?</strong>
No, because blood vessels are leaky and elastic. Blood can pool in swollen vessels and most especially as fluid in the tissues at the lower end of the circuit.
pz is offline  
Old 11-14-2002, 05:13 AM   #386
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by pz:
<strong>

No, because blood vessels are leaky [...]</strong>
Which is of course the point of capillaries: to supply oxygen, food etc to tissues, and to collect waste products. They’d have to be watertight to produce suction from one half of the system (arteries) to the other (veins), and then they wouldn’t do their job.

Nice thought though.

DT
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 11-14-2002, 09:29 AM   #387
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Asha'man:
<strong>Hmm, no replies. Does this mean that Vanderzyden finally admitted to himself that he doesn't understand the physics?</strong>
To paraphrase John himself, it's a clear indication that he now completely agrees with us and admits that he was wrong.

Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 11-14-2002, 01:12 PM   #388
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Asha'man:
<strong>Hmm, no replies. Does this mean that Vanderzyden finally admitted to himself that he doesn't understand the physics?</strong>
Not that I especially want to defend him, but he has not posted in any discussion in several days, and posted only 1 or 2 times a day for several days before that. I have to admit I'm somewhat sympathetic as I know how much time this forum can take up, which I myself simply don't have to spare right now.
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 11-15-2002, 09:45 AM   #389
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Post

Just wanted to point out to people that Darwin's Terrier = Oolon, and Dr Rick = rbochnermd (in case someone is confused)

Nice name changes btw! I couldn't pronounce either of your names before.

scigirl
scigirl is offline  
Old 11-15-2002, 10:05 AM   #390
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by scigirl:
<strong>Just wanted to point out to people that Darwin's Terrier = Oolon, and Dr Rick = rbochnermd (in case someone is confused)

Nice name changes btw! I couldn't pronounce either of your names before.

scigirl</strong>
Ah, so THAT'S where Oolon went.
Dr Rick was easier to notice and figure out.

Oh, scigirl, check out the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy DVDs for a pronounciation on Oolon.
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.