FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2003, 03:44 PM   #81
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default Re: Re: Believing in God

Quote:
Originally posted by wiploc
1. Suppose I told you there was a lion in your hall closet. You looked and didn't find it. You decided it wasn't there.

2. Then someone told you there was a catamount. You didn't find that either.

3. Someone said there was an invisible bobcat. You look. If it's there, it's invisible. You see no reason to believe it.

4. You also don't find the lynx, the mountain lion, the pink panther, and several other cats you are told are in your closet.

Would it be unreasonable for you to find yourself predisposed to disbelieve in whatever feral feline you will next be told is in your closet? You don't have a definition of it, but you are prejudiced against it to the extent that it is fair to say that you already disbelieve.
crc
I would have to be familiar with the concept of whatever I would find next in my closet to *not* believe in it. Otherwise if someone would ask me if I believed in "xygjdoirh" I would have to say "I don't know" not "no I dont believe" To form an opinion I would have to know some definition of some sort.
Amie is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 03:47 PM   #82
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default Re: Re: Re: Believing in God

Amie,

Quote:

Otherwise if someone would ask me if I believed in "xygjdoirh" I would have to say "I don't know" not "no I dont believe"
Incorrect. At any given point in time, you either believe that a xygjdoirh exists or you do not believe that a xygjdoirh exists.

Again, you do not need to know what a xygjdoirh is to not believe that a xygjdoirh exists.

Please, pay attention!

Sincerely,

Goliath

(editud cuz me not gotteren such gooder grammur)
Goliath is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 03:50 PM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

I must admit I am rather surprised to hear some say that have no faith in anything, I have never heard anyone say none at all whatsoever...Its interesting...
Amie is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 03:53 PM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Believing in God

Quote:
Originally posted by Goliath
Amie,



Incorrect. At any given point in time, you either believe that a xygjdoirh exists or you do not believe that a xygjdoirh exists.

Again, you do not need to know what a xygjdoirh to not believe that a xygjdoirh exists.

Please, pay attention!

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath I am paying attention. I just do not think like you. COPE!
Amie is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 03:53 PM   #85
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Amie,

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
I must admit I am rather surprised to hear some say that have no faith in anything, I have never heard anyone say none at all whatsoever...Its interesting...
What's so surprising about it? Having no faith is an incredibly simple thing. What surprises me is that so many people continue to desperately hold onto their faith.

Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 03:55 PM   #86
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Believing in God

Amie,

Quote:

Goliath I am paying attention.
Then you're aware that there is a difference between saying "I do not believe that X exists," and "I believe that X does not exist."? Good! Your posts seemed to indicate otherwise.

Quote:

I just do not think like you.
Not only that, but your thinking is incorrect when you assert that a definition of a thing is necessary for not believing that said thing exists.

Quote:


COPE!
Grumpy, are we? Do you need a nap?



Sincerely,

Goliath
Goliath is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 04:00 PM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Goliath I just want you to know I think you are condescending and rude. I really dont have anything else to say to you.
Amie is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 04:01 PM   #88
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Amie,

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
Goliath I just want you to know I think you are condescending and rude. I really dont have anything else to say to you.
If you are going to continue to act like a whiny child, I will have no problem with continuing to treat you like one.

Sincerely,

Goliath

(edited to add "are going to continue to")
Goliath is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 04:08 PM   #89
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 281
Default

Amie - I think this has to do with the difference in the way atheists view the meanings of the words 'faith' and 'belief' versus theists.

In general, theists use the two words pretty much interchangably. Nontheists tend to draw a more strict line between the two words. My own personal reason for drawing such a distinction between the two words actually arises out of an apologetic I frequently see used by theists as an argument for 'faith' - the old analogy between having 'faith' that your parents love you and having 'faith' that God is there and loves you.

I 'believe' that my parents love me, because I have ample evidence, both of the physical variety (they did, in fact, put up with me for 16+ years of essentially freeloading heh), and experiential - and unlike the experiential claims of theists, my experiences can in fact be checked against the experiences of other people who do NOT have a stake in the question of whether or not my parents love me (as an example, I could ask someone who has seen them behave in a 'loving' way towards me whether in fact they HAD in fact seen that act).

I do not have 'faith' that my parents love me, because to most nontheists, 'faith' implies belief without evidence that can be corroborated by more neutral parties. I do not need such 'faith', as I have ample evidence to base my 'belief' on.

Technically, under at least one dictionary definition of the term, my 'belief' that my parents love me would qualify as 'faith'. However, I, and most nontheists, do not use the term 'faith' under that definition, because it tends to lead to confusion when discussing issues like this with theists (it leads to the apologetic above amongst other things, which is terribly annoying for the nontheist to have to demonstrate false for the umpteenth time).

"Faith" to most of the nontheists on this board, is used in a very narrowly defined sense - the sense of 'belief without tangible or highly corroborated evidence'.

In that sense, I, and many other nontheists, do in fact maintain that we do not have 'faith' in anything. We strive to place our 'beliefs' in that which can be demonstrated and shown to be accurately in line with what actually IS in reality.

Cheers,

The San Diego Atheist
SanDiegoAtheist is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 04:12 PM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoAtheist
Amie - I think this has to do with the difference in the way atheists view the meanings of the words 'faith' and 'belief' versus theists.
Hi SanDiego Atheist I think you are right about this...and thank you for helping me understand the differences between the two, that as you said are often used interchangably by some.
Amie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.