FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2003, 07:13 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
Default Infinite places

Quote:
Originally posted by Defiant Heretic
But what if there is a smallest possible particle, something which cannot be divided?
I assume matter is grainy. That doesn't mean space is grainy. I even understand that there is a minimum length-of-motion, so that if a particle is at A and wants to move toward B, it has to go all the way toward B; it can't just go halfway. But I don't know of any reason to think that means the place halfway between A and B doesn't exist, or that it couldn't be occupied by something coming from someplace other than A.



Quote:
Then you can't really count any measurement smaller than it, and so any measurement becomes finite.
Isn't this a bit like saying there are too many grains of sand on the beach to count --- so we're going to say there are ten? Or like saying, we looked diligently for Bin Laden without finding him, therefore he doesn't exist?


Quote:

If you're just talking mathematically, then yes, but a point is an abstract.
I'm talking about actual places. Do we have any reason to believe space itself is grainy as opposed to being a continuum? If it's a continuum, then there are an infinite number of actual places on a line.
crc
Wiploc is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 07:20 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Big Spoon
Mathematically speaking, infinity and infinitesimals are limits, you would say
"x tends to infinity" but never "x=infinity".
The natural numbers, {1,2,3,...} (and arguably 0) are actually the sizes of the finite sets and using set theory it is possible to demonstrate, as Georg Cantor did, that there are infinite different sizes of infinity. It is conjectured that the size of the continuum (the "real line") is "Aleph 1", the second size of infinity after the natural numbers (Aleph Null) but this is all very abstract and doesn't relate to physical infinity.
Why wouldn't numbers map onto the points of a physical line?
crc
Wiploc is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 08:39 AM   #13
eh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 624
Default

It seems there are 3 main candidates for the existence of a real infinity in nature. They are the infinity of space, the infinity of time, and the question of whether or not space is continuous. Modern cosmology puts doubt on infinite time, and area and volume may be discrete with a quantum theory of gravity. Then I suppose you could still have an infinite number of points on length (loops, strings, etc.) but who knows if that is actually an accurate description of space?

Even if the other 2 infinites are abolished, there still remains the infinity of space. There doesn't seem to be a way to prove either finite or infinite space, and either is consistant with observations from cosmology. But an infinite universe would introduce new infinities, with an infinite amount of mass, galaxies etc.
eh is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 08:44 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up Shit Creek
Posts: 1,810
Default

not one "Actual" infinity I can think of.

Pi is an abstraction, just like all numbers, even "infinity+1".

Xeno's paradox (all the little half-way points between halfway point) aren't actual. they are abstractions of our perceptions a product of our mind trying to impose perceptions on reality. Halfway points exist only whjere they are at. any comparision relatively is an imposition of a relationship that "actually" doesn't exist, especially concerning a singular object and its so-called constituent half-ways.

Absolute zero can't be reached and the speed of light is finite, just really really fast.

Space is grainy, as far as we can tell. Plank structure, Zero-point energy, the electron "jitter" motion point pretty clearly to a grainy structure of space and matter.

my 2 cents.
NearNihil Experience is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 08:46 AM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: california
Posts: 154
Default

what about time? is it possible for time to stretch infinitely into the past? i dont think so because then you would have an "actual infinite" of something. for instance, if i was standing up, and an infinite amount of people had to sit down before i could, i would never sit down. sounds cheesy but i think it illustrates the point.
thomaq is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 08:50 AM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 13,389
Default

No physical infinities.
On a side note: isn't it interesting how difficult it is to transition between ideal mathematical models and physical reality
For instance, lots of infinities exist in the mathematics of physics, such as the infinite range of gravity or infinite width of wave function. But it reality do any of these things actually exist?
AdamWho is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 09:41 AM   #17
eh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 624
Default

Well it would seem the range of gravity is infinite, but is this would seem to be a potential instead of an actual. The idea is if you take 2 masses and seperate them, you potentially can seperate them with an infinite amount of space and will still have gravitational attraction between them.
eh is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 09:57 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

If black holes are found to exist, would the matter density be infinite?

Or would that only be if you found one that wasn't spinning?
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 10:21 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Default

We can only calcuate 'pi' to a finite number of decimal places.

Even if you were using huge, superfast computers to calcuate 'pi', no matter how fast the calculations were being done, at the moment you looked at the display, you would see--even if only for that instant--that the ongoing calculations had reached a whole, finite, number of decimal places.

Sure, in the next instant, that number would change, would increase--but the new number of decimal place calculations, too, would remain a finite, whole (albeit very large) number.

K
Keith Russell is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 11:23 AM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: california
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by thomaq
what about time? is it possible for time to stretch infinitely into the past? i dont think so because then you would have an "actual infinite" of something. for instance, if i was standing up, and an infinite amount of people had to sit down before i could, i would never sit down. sounds cheesy but i think it illustrates the point.
thomaq is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.