FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2002, 09:52 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Thumbs down

Well, thanks for that vote of confidence, Diana, but there would first need to be some meat for me to mince.

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos: OK, when the ego raptures that which remains is in heaven.
Un hunh...

Waiter? Check please...

Quote:
MORE: Before you can accept that you have first have remove your preconceived idea of the biblical rapture parable (sorry about that),
Just that?

Quote:
MORE: but it once again points at the dual nature of Jesus-the-Jew and Jesus-the-man.
Yes, you've made this nonsensical claim repeatedly. Why not just call him "Jewsus?"

Quote:
MORE: This same duality exists in us as both "man" and "human."
What? Do the world a favor and read a goddamned dictionary just once. "Man" is a gender qualifier; "Human" is a species qualifier. There is no "duality" to being a man (one who has a penis) and being human (one who is a homo sapiens).

If anything, "man" is merely a subset of the species commonly referred to as "human."

Likewise with your nonsense about "Jewsus." Jesus is a "man" because he (allegedly) had a penis; he was Jewish because his parents indoctrinated him into the Jewish cult.

No duality at all. He was merely a man who believed in Judaism, if you accept his existence at all.

Quote:
MORE: The prefix -hu is from -humi and means "earthly" which now means that humans are earthly and man is heavenly--
Where do you get "man is heavenly" from?

I withdraw the question.

Quote:
MORE: if you allow me to juxtapose heaven with earth.
No, I will not until you prove such a ludicrous fairy land to factually exist, but somehow I don't think that will stop you.

Quote:
Amos: I take the words at their dictionary value's but not the combination of them.

KOY: How is this at all relevant to my OP?

Amos: Just to prove that you are an impoverished religious fundamentalist.


Having fun trolling I see. Well, small minds are clearly entertained by small deeds.

Quote:
MORE: To be an atheist and not believe in God
Is a redundancy.

Quote:
MORE: one must "be" God and have no doubt
Since no such fictional being factually exists and the ones that are written about number into the thousands, could you please define which magical fairy creature you are talking about?

I withdraw the question.

Quote:
MORE: because only knowledge and understanding can set you free
Phew, finally, one cogent fragment. What's next?

Quote:
MORE: from any belief of which doubt is its opposite.
Haven't a clue on that one. Knowledge and understanding can set you free from any belief of which doubt is its opposite...

So, knowledge and understanding is the only way to remove doubt? Is that what you're going for?

What's the "opposite" stuff all about and what would that have to do with assumed belief in a fictional being that is defined as "not knowable?"

Is this your first computer and you just love the way the keys feel? Is that it?

Quote:
Amos: The parables are groups of conventional words used to describe non-conventional events.

KOY: No, they are not. Parables are short fictitious stories that illustrate a moral attitude or a religious principle.

Amos: Only if you do not see the reality behind them.
Isn't it meds time?

Would you care to pick any one of Jesus' parables and demonstrate precisely what the "reality behind" it is?

I withdraw the question.

Quote:
Amos: These events are real and so parables have meaning because they point at something that is real.

KOY: No, they do not. Try reading that dictionary you mentioned before.

Amos: There are no parables in dictionaries but dictionary words are used to write parables.
And Amos likes to look at pretty pictures, don't you Amos? Yes! Cute widdle Amos! Say, "Hi, hi!" Say, "Hi, hi!" Gooood Amos.

Let's try this again. Look in a dictionary for the definition of the word "parable," ok? Gooood Amos.

Quote:
Amos: I look at the reality
Judging from what you've written here, I seriously doubt you're capable of looking at the reality...

Quote:
MORE: and evaluate the wording of the parable to see how effective they describe the events.

KOY: Then you are one of the most self-deluded individuals I've ever had the misfortune of addressing since there is no "reality" for you to look at (it's a collection of unsupported, ancient mythology) and parables are not utilized to describe actual events; they are used to impart specific morality or cult-oriented tenets.

Amos: You forget here that only beauty and truth are real.
And Amos loves his bankie! Seepy time, Amos! Seepy time...

So, your "argument" is that the rapture--a future event--has already occurred (I suppose, in some sort of eternal time loop paradox, yes) and that our soul is already in heaven as we are here on earth, is that about the thrust of things?

Thanks for participating! Don't let the URL slam you in the ass on your way out...


(edited for formatting - Koy)

[ January 07, 2002: Message edited by: Koyaanisqatsi ]</p>
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 01-07-2002, 11:26 AM   #32
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi:
<strong>
What? Do the world a favor and read a goddamned dictionary just once. "Man" is a gender qualifier; "Human" is a species qualifier. There is no "duality" to being a man (one who has a penis) and being human (one who is a homo sapiens). </strong>

There is duality, of course there is, and dictionaries will tell you that hormone therapy is needed to change the gender of man from male to female or visa versa. In here an increase of our womanity will be at the cost of our humanity and an increase of our human-ity will be at the cost of our woman-ity.

Please tell me why the suffix -ity does not belong to man (as in "man-ity") if our condition of being man belongs to the species human? I understand that English is my second language but should language not speak for itself?<strong>

If anything "man" is merely a subset of the species commonly referred to as "human." </strong>

Yes, you have this just backwards (which does not surprise me).<strong>

So, your "argument" is that the rapture--a future event--has already occurred (I suppose, in some sort of eternal time loop paradox, yes) and that our soul is already in heaven as we are here on earth, is that about the thrust of things?
</strong>
Sorry, I can't speak for you and I do not know if the rapture is futuristic in your life or not.

My question would be: what good is it to you if your soul is in heaven while you are [still] on earth?

From my view heaven and earth become one and the same when we become part of our soul and for this to happen our ego must rapture first. So unlike popular American belief that after the rapture we go to heaven, I suggest that after the rapture we remain on earth which now becomes heaven because the ego has raptured.

BTW "The rapture" is not a universal event but just a personal realization of truth.

Amos
 
Old 01-07-2002, 12:47 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Thumbs down

Quote:
Amos: BTW "The rapture" is not a universal event but just a personal realization of truth
...for you...in your little world, there...

Quote:
Amos: There is duality, of course there is, and dictionaries will tell you that hormone therapy is needed to change the gender of man from male to female or visa versa.
What has this to do with the fact that the word "man" is used to denote a subset of humanity? What is this pointless dance of semantics in aid of?

Have you been huffing spray paint?

Quote:
MORE: In here an increase of our womanity will be at the cost of our humanity and an increase of our human-ity will be at the cost of our woman-ity.
And an increase in your dose-sicity would would be an increase in our tranquility.

Quote:
MORE: Please tell me why the suffix -ity does not belong to man (as in "man-ity")
Because there is no such thing as the word "manity" and suffix are just made up elements of our language that we use--normally--to communicate with.

There is no hidden code or deep, spiritual meaning and speaking the "true" name of god backwards will not uncreate reality, ok?

Quote:
MORE: if our condition of being man belongs to the species human?
Our "condition" of being called a man is a gender issue as a subset of the species human (aka, homo sapiens).

Quote:
MORE: I understand that English is my second language but should language not speak for itself?
What is your primary language? Do us all a favor and let that "speak" for itself, because right now you're all over the map and/or high as a friggin' kite.

Quote:
KOY: If anything "man" is merely a subset of the species commonly referred to as "human."

Amos: Yes, you have this just backwards (which does not surprise me).
No, I do not. Among homo sapiens, there are two genders. One is commonly called "Man" and the other is commonly called "Woman." These are nothing more than qualifying words that have no special, secret meaning that unlocks anything supernatural. There is no cosmic code to it all, other than poetry, which is nice work if you can get it.

Dancing around in a trippy sort of daze with etymology only leads you right back to your own mind, my friend, so, by all means, enjoy the circuitous pointlessness and read whatever you want into things that have no complexity beyond that which you inflict.

Quote:
KOY: So, your "argument" is that the rapture--a future event--has already occurred (I suppose, in some sort of eternal time loop paradox, yes) and that our soul is already in heaven as we are here on earth, is that about the thrust of things?

Amos: Sorry, I can't speak for you and I do not know if the rapture is futuristic in your life or not.
That's ok, I was trying to figure out if this was your claim for yourself. You don't worry your widdle head about me.

Quote:
MORE: My question would be: what good is it to you if your soul is in heaven while you are [still] on earth?
Since you've just typed little more than poetic nonsense, I couldn't answer you. There is no such thing as a "soul" to be in a ficticious place called "heaven" while I am still on earth.

Don't worry, it's not your fault. You've clearly been brainwashed so severely that they've removed several layers.

Quote:
MORE: From my view heaven and earth become one and the same when we become part of our soul and for this to happen our ego must rapture first.
Great. Have fun with that. Now, would you care to address the arguments? Are you capable of addressing the arguments?

Quote:
MORE: So unlike popular American belief that after the rapture we go to heaven, I suggest that after the rapture we remain on earth which now becomes heaven because the ego has raptured.
You should get together with RainbowWalking and Metacrock and have yourselves a lovely little revisionist picnic and look at all the pretty butterflies and dance and sing your rhetoric into the happy, happy clouds.

I don't suppose the idea that all of this "rapture" nonsense was either the product of frightened, oppressed desert nomads desperately creating a ficticious mythology that would explain away and thus alleviate their suffering or the more probable notion that an elite faction of control freaks deliberately concocted such childishly simplistic imagery in order to manipulate people such as yourself into following their cult ever crossed your "mind," right?

I withdraw the question.

(edited for formatting - Koy)

[ January 07, 2002: Message edited by: Koyaanisqatsi ]</p>
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 03:57 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Post

Ding Ding! Round three?

Damn. And me without my popcorn...

During the next intermission, let's all stand and sing "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."

Whee.

d
diana is offline  
Old 01-08-2002, 04:12 PM   #35
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

There is no cosmic code to it all, other than poetry, which is nice work if you can get it.

Not really, the pay is lousy, and one's fellow practicioners are frequently Not All There.

Michael
Vorkosigan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.