FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2002, 04:39 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Post

I think that we basically use all of our brain, although a lot of the information is duplicated (that's how neural networks work) - but there is a potential for us to store a lot more information. That is because we can form new connections - neurons can literally attach themselves to different neurons so that new memories can be formed. (Well that's what I thought I heard - maybe I'm wrong)
It's like having a notepad and filling it up with diagrams and writing, then putting in smaller and smaller writing, trying to cram it all in. If you wrote small enough, you could write a whole encyclopedia in that notepad.

[ January 10, 2002: Message edited by: excreationist ]</p>
excreationist is offline  
Old 01-10-2002, 05:12 AM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post

Thanks for posting that UO.

This sounds like a typical piece of creationist propaganda. Without clarification on what “full mental potential” means, it’s impossible to criticise it. But I’ll bet a pound to a penny the people quoted were not saying that the vast majority of our brain isn’t being used for something -- most likely, it just isn’t being used for higher level thinking. Maybe 99.99% of our mental potential (whatever that means) isn’t being used, maybe it is. But that’s a long way from saying that 99.99% of our brain’s mass is unused. It ain’t what you’ve got, it’s what you do with it .

Another point: there is, I understand, a strong correlation in primates between brain size (relative to body size) and social complexity. I'll check and get back to you.

TTFN, Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 01-10-2002, 06:45 AM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 226
Post

<a href="http://www.csicop.org/si/9903/ten-percent-myth.html" target="_blank">http://www.csicop.org/si/9903/ten-percent-myth.html</a>
CodeMason is offline  
Old 01-10-2002, 12:59 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1,128
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by uncle_onion:
<strong>If Evolution is correct,why do we have more brain cells than we need?
</strong>
Speak for yourself. As I grow older I am becoming acutely aware that I could very well use many more braincells than I seem to have...

fG
faded_Glory is offline  
Old 01-10-2002, 01:27 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 1,844
Wink

Standing in road, handkerchief on head, arms straight down, wrists curled in:
“My . . . . . brain . . . . hurts.”
hyzer is offline  
Old 01-10-2002, 05:50 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Post

Quote:
Its power and versatility far surpass that of any man-made computer.
Well, this is an apples and oranges situation. Man-made computers are linear, and human brains are parallel. If you try to search your brain for a memory, you effectively search the entire thing at once. A computer must search linearly, one memory after another. However, a computer is capable of performing certain types of operations, like math, extremely quickly and with great precision. Therefore, a computer is far better at some tasks, and a brain is far better at others.
Asha'man is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.