FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2003, 01:11 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Default Re: severe acute respiratory syndrome

Quote:
Originally posted by alek0
...Apparently it is fatal in about 3% fo the cases, the only trouble is that there is no effective treatment for it. But considering a) there are 8 million people in this city and about 260 are sick b) illness is fatal in 3% of cases c) the illness appears to spread by droplets and it is mainly confined to medical personnel and family members of the sick I don't see why is there such a fuss over it...
I shudder at imagining the reaction if I ever dared to tell my patients that "I don't see why...there [is] such a fuss over" a 3% mortality rate for something for which "there is no effective treatment" and "is mainly confined to medical personnel and family members of the sick."

Quote:
There are far worse and more contagious illnesses, so what's the big deal?
There are many far worse or more contagious illnesses, but there are none identified that are far worse and more contagious whose cause is unknown.

That's what makes SARS frightening, and what frightens me.

Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 01:56 PM   #12
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Default

Another scary way to think about it: if there is a 3% chance of dying from it, and if it swept through a family of 5 (like mine), there is a 1 in 7 chance that at least one of us would die.

Those are not good odds. I wouldn't want to play that game.
pz is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 02:08 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Median strip of DC beltway
Posts: 1,888
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ps418
Health officials are facing the possibility that the deadly super-pneumonia currently spreading around the world may be spread far more easily than thought.
Well, considering how little thought there is in the world, this doesn't sound too dangerous.
NialScorva is offline  
Old 04-03-2003, 07:14 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
Default

The BBC has posted a pretty concise and readable FAQ on SARS. And, they're reporting that the WHO has actually advised people against traveling into Guangdong or Hong Kong.

I keep hearing it referred to as "superflu." I think the name's too catchy to not become popular. It certainly sounds better than either SARS or "supercold."

--W@L
Writer@Large is offline  
Old 04-03-2003, 12:07 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 433
Default

This is the first time I'm happy that I've become an agoraphobic. I purchase everything on the internet. I always put special instructions to please leave packages on my back porch. When UPS delivers the guy always rings the doorbell and I say "thank you" He says "OK see ya next time" (that's kind of funny) see ya... lol

I really do miss playing kissy face with Dr. Rick though.
MadKally is offline  
Old 04-03-2003, 12:24 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Default

...Kally, we'll just have to wear masks and take homeopathics as a precaution...

xoxoxox
Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 04-03-2003, 12:30 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 433
Thumbs up

Homeopathics, LMAO! Then we will be perfectly safe from just about every pathogen or virus in the world. Oh goody, I can hardly wait,

oxoxoxox
Kally
MadKally is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 11:48 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Default

The latest worldwide SARS data from the WHO now lists 174 probable cases in the US, with no fatalities yet, while Singapore, for example, has 158 cases and 12 deaths. The mortality rate so far is very low in the US. However, there is no data on how many of these cases have recovered at this point, so many of the people now ill may not recover. The number of cases worldwide is now (4/14/03) at 3169, with 144 deaths, and 1499 recovered.

Patrick
ps418 is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 11:53 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default

Three more fatalities over the weekend in Ontario. That makes 13 so far.

No, people should not move into "panic mode", but 13 is a considerable number, and as I mentioned earlier, the health system wasn't prepared to deal with mass cancellations of elective surgeries and multiple quarantines for those who are infected or "may be".

It is an issue worth being concerned about, but I strolled happily through Chinatown yesterday, and I didn't see any platic suits (although I have see a fe masks).
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 12:08 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr Rick

I shudder at imagining the reaction if I ever dared to tell my patients that "I don't see why...there [is] such a fuss over" a 3% mortality rate for something for which "there is no effective treatment" and "is mainly confined to medical personnel and family members of the sick."
....
Distract them by talking about circumcision instead. Or the Atkins Diet. Or both.
Gurdur is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.