FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2003, 02:20 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Missouri
Posts: 112
Default morality, holiness, and God

Perhaps a theist can answer these questions.

1. God is often said to be absolutely moral, or holy. God's attributes are also said to not contingent on anything. However, morality only make sense in relation to other entities. For instance, if you look at the Ten Commandments, every commandment is in regards to either the relationship between God and the individual or between individuals. If God were the only entity that existed, it would be silly to call Him/it holy or moral. God's holiness DEPENDS on other beings, and thus is contingent. This violates the way the attributes of God are generally viewed.

2. The things which are considered moral or immoral in Christianity and other religions are often contingent on the way this particular universe is structured. For instance, homosexuality is often considered a sin. However, for homosexuality to be possible depends on such things as sexual reproduction. God could have designed the universe in a way that avoided the "problem" of homosexuality. Likewise, stealing would probably not exist in a universe without scarce resources, and lying would not exist in a universe where our thoughts were not hidden from each other. Murder would not exist in a universe where we lived an appointed time and died, without the ability to kill each other.
Morality is thus relative to the universe one finds oneself in and the God which made the rules. One could say, "But God invented those rules to give us the free will to obey him or not." This, however, would be in conflict with God as a moral God; He could not be moral in that case. He would simply be arbitrary.

3. People who know Plato probably see where this is heading. My third question is, "Is an act moral because God says it is moral, or does God say an act is moral because it is moral?" If the former, God is arbitrary. If the latter, God is not the arbiter of morality, but merely a conduit (as any human can be).


Can any theist answer these three questions?
RichardMorey is offline  
Old 03-03-2003, 03:51 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Default

This would only apply to the Judeo/Christian type God. The Taoist would say 'God' is neither good or bag, good and bad are human inventions.
Marduk is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 01:44 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default Re: morality, holiness, and God

Quote:
Originally posted by RichardMorey
Perhaps a theist can answer these questions.

1. God is often said to be absolutely moral, or holy. God's attributes are also said to not contingent on anything. However, morality only make sense in relation to other entities. For instance, if you look at the Ten Commandments, every commandment is in regards to either the relationship between God and the individual or between individuals. If God were the only entity that existed, it would be silly to call Him/it holy or moral. God's holiness DEPENDS on other beings, and thus is contingent. This violates the way the attributes of God are generally viewed.

2. The things which are considered moral or immoral in Christianity and other religions are often contingent on the way this particular universe is structured. For instance, homosexuality is often considered a sin. However, for homosexuality to be possible depends on such things as sexual reproduction. God could have designed the universe in a way that avoided the "problem" of homosexuality. Likewise, stealing would probably not exist in a universe without scarce resources, and lying would not exist in a universe where our thoughts were not hidden from each other. Murder would not exist in a universe where we lived an appointed time and died, without the ability to kill each other.
Morality is thus relative to the universe one finds oneself in and the God which made the rules. One could say, "But God invented those rules to give us the free will to obey him or not." This, however, would be in conflict with God as a moral God; He could not be moral in that case. He would simply be arbitrary.

3. People who know Plato probably see where this is heading. My third question is, "Is an act moral because God says it is moral, or does God say an act is moral because it is moral?" If the former, God is arbitrary. If the latter, God is not the arbiter of morality, but merely a conduit (as any human can be).


Can any theist answer these three questions?
I cannot answer from a philosophical standpoint as philosophy is a complete mystery to me. A philosopher could probably convince me that the moon is made of green cheese.

1. Morality, in relation to God, is absolute not relative. It is human beings who say it is relative, usually in an attempt to justify some wrongdoing!

2. God COULD easily have constructed the universe differently. However, He did give humans free will which was used to rebel against Him. Non theists (and also some Christians it must be said) do have a tendency to lay the blame at God's door. But what was God supposed to do? We greatly under-estimate the effects of our sin and how much we should love God for providing redemption. (Not meant to be preaching here but cannot answer any other way.)

3. If morality is absolute, I don't think your question arises.


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 08:59 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Missouri
Posts: 112
Default Re: Re: morality, holiness, and God

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
I cannot answer from a philosophical standpoint as philosophy is a complete mystery to me. A philosopher could probably convince me that the moon is made of green cheese.

1. Morality, in relation to God, is absolute not relative. It is human beings who say it is relative, usually in an attempt to justify some wrongdoing!
Please address the argument. Did you read it?

Quote:
2. God COULD easily have constructed the universe differently. However, He did give humans free will which was used to rebel against Him. Non theists (and also some Christians it must be said) do have a tendency to lay the blame at God's door. But what was God supposed to do? We greatly under-estimate the effects of our sin and how much we should love God for providing redemption. (Not meant to be preaching here but cannot answer any other way.)
Again, you totally missed the point. Please reread it.

Quote:

3. If morality is absolute, I don't think your question arises.


What does "morality is absolute" mean? Please be explicit. That's exactly when the it DOES apply.
RichardMorey is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 10:36 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

1. Morality, in relation to God, is absolute not relative. It is human beings who say it is relative, usually in an attempt to justify some wrongdoing!

That just isn't so. Morality, even God's morality, is relative to time and place.
Let's take a look at Father Abraham. He was the most moral guy of his time. God Himself gets called "the God of Abraham" after him. All three great western religions trace back to him.
But look at his story, he whores out his wife, he's an adulterer, he's a slave owner, he's a rapist, a child abuser, a rustler and a vivisectionist.
Today the police, the FBI and the SPCA would all be after Abraham. Were he a minister his church would collapse under the scandal. But in his time and place he was the most moral man alive.
So you seem to have this backwards malookiemaloo. Morals didn't change so that people could justify wrongdoing. Morals changed so that people would stop justifying wrongdoing. Things are getting better, not worse, on the morals front. Even God's morals (according to believers) have improved over the centuries. We toss perves like Abraham into jail these days instead of honoring them.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 03:03 PM   #6
Cthulhu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: morality, holiness, and God

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
Non theists (and also some Christians it must be said) do have a tendency to lay the blame at God's door.
Nontheists don't lay anything at God's door, because by definition they don't believe in him.


Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
If morality is absolute, I don't think your question arises.
Well then I guess morality isn't absolute.
 
Old 03-05-2003, 12:02 AM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default Re: Re: Re: morality, holiness, and God

Quote:
Originally posted by RichardMorey
Please address the argument. Did you read it?


Again, you totally missed the point. Please reread it.



What does "morality is absolute" mean? Please be explicit. That's exactly when the it DOES apply. [/B]
OK. I'll re-read.


M
malookiemaloo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.