FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2003, 07:36 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
Default

I thought all moderators were.
SULPHUR is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 07:58 AM   #12
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SULPHUR
I thought all moderators were.
As a matter of conscience I've outted myself. Of course all OTHER mods are, in fact, gods. My resignation will be on your desk by the end of the day.
CX is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 08:54 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Smile Re: Re: writing

Quote:
Originally posted by keyser_soze
Read closer, it's rebbe, not carpenter. His father was a carpenter. Of course, that is assuming you can buy into the myth.
Carpenter according to Mark. Carpenter's son according to Matthew. Compare Mark 6:3 and Matthew 13:55.

Though it is s singly attested datum in the second stratum, many scholars would accept it as being history remembered if for no other reason than the fact that it is an incindental detail lacking any sort of theological motivation. Further, Matthew may have found Jesus the Cosmic Lord who was a carpenter a pinch embarrassing and decided to alter it to Carpenter's son.

Jesus probably was a carpenter but at any rate, he certainly worked with his hands and was on the lower half of that great Greco-Roman divide.

Meier also makes an argument for literacy on the part of Jesus. Its the best one I've seen and deserves consideration even if it is not altogether convincing to you.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 08:58 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Smile Re: Why didn't Jesus write anything?

Quote:
[B]Why didn't Jesus write anything? Does this constitute a good slapdown of the historical Jesus position?
The pericope de adultera records Jesus as writing in the sand

The lack of written materials from a person 2,000 years ago is not a good slapdown of their historicity. If we implement this principle and take into account thatprobably over 90% of the population in that space-time vicinity was illiterate, we will eliminate over 90% of the population from history. Written materials from a person would be, however, good evidence of their historicity. The lack of them is not an argument against historicity, however.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:01 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default Re: Re: Why didn't Jesus write anything?

So Vinnie, was this historically-vague-but-fairly-conventional Jesus of yours, "the Son of God" or other type of deity?
Celsus is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:07 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default Re: Re: Re: Why didn't Jesus write anything?

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus
So Vinnie, was this historically-vague-but-fairly-conventional Jesus of yours, "the Son of God" or other type of deity?
I keep the Jesus of my faith and the Jesus of history seperate. Whether or not they are the same individual, I don't really care either way.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:22 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Why didn't Jesus write anything?

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
I keep the Jesus of my faith and the Jesus of history seperate. Whether or not they are the same individual, I don't really care either way.
I'm afraid I don't understand how this works, could you explain further? What does your Jesus of faith rest upon?

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:27 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Existential experiences within the Christian tradition. I consider myself a pluralist_Christian. The "Jesus of my faith" is synonymous with "God".

Whether the Jesus of history was literally God incarnate or not, I have no opinion on that. There is no possible way for anyone to provide evidence for such a claim. Its the functional value of faith experiences that cause me to make the ontological claim.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:37 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
Existential experiences within the Christian tradition. I consider myself a pluralist_Christian. The "Jesus of my faith" is synonymous with "God".

Whether the Jesus of history was literally God incarnate or not, I have no opinion on that. There is no possible way for anyone to provide evidence for such a claim. Its the functional value of faith experiences that cause me to make the ontological claim.
Thanks for the explanation.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 09:55 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus
Thanks for the explanation.

Joel
No problem.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.