Jackalope

<takes a bow> Thank you verrah much.

winstonjen

Pate has now responded to the final round of the debate, and as far as I can see, is merely spouting the same nonsensical tripe he has been doing for the rest of the debate. What are your views on Pate's arguments?

Albert Cipriani

Wert it that all questions be this easy: PATE IS BLINKERED. It's as if he himself IS a straw man for all the straw men arguments he has spawned.

And I say this with no glee, but with sorrow, for my conclusions are more akin to Pate's than to yours. -- Sincerely, Albert the Traditional Catholic

winstonjen

Well, now that the debate is over, you can read Pate's comments here - http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/sho...6&pagenumber=3

Here are some pretty blasphemous things I've said:

Does that growth from suffering means that we should seek it out? After all, the parable of the lost sheep indicates that the stray sheep that comes back is worth more than the 99 who didn't run away. So to be more valuable, we must sin, even though god hates that.