FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2003, 09:42 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cipher Girl
Magus55, you are simply a Christian of Jewish heritage. If you follow the teachings of Jesus and the New Testament, then you are a Christian. Why are you so reluctant to use the word "Christian"?
That's what I keep wondering. I know a woman who was born and raised Jewish and then when she moved from New York to Oklahoma (I have no idea why either) she converted to Christianity. She mixed no words about it. She said she was Jewish but became a born-agan Christian. Pretty straightforward. Don't understand what the real difference is between her and Magus.
Hedwig is offline  
Old 07-02-2003, 10:57 PM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Opera Nut
He still hasn't told us why he is so afraid to be called a Christian.
It could be that he wants to be distanced from all the atrocities done in the name of Christianity. However, as I doubt that Magus actually perpetrated those acts, I can't see what he's worried about.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 06:12 AM   #43
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Thanks RatBac and Esther for that sweeping indictment of 20 Million People who live in Texas. ALL 20 Million of us must be like.....THAT!! [[sarcasm alert]]]
Where in my post did I say anything bad about Texas? All I did was ask you a question.

Why on earth do you care so much what Magus calls himself?
EstherRose is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 08:18 PM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Opera Nut
I will not argue about whether Jesus said he was the Messiah when he said "Sum via veritas, et vita". I am not referring to any theological interpretation of the alleged words of Jesus.
Especially since there is no historical record of his existence and the Council of Nicea decided which books were to be canonicall (i.e. authoritative). That is in Biblical History and Archaeology.
Then I fail to see why you're arguing this at all. What the hell do you care whether Jews can believe in Christ as Messiah if you think it's all a myth anyway?
yguy is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 08:40 PM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
Default

yguy---------

BINGO

Opera Nut has lost. Just does not know it yet.
Rational BAC is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 09:32 PM   #46
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
What the hell do you care whether Jews can believe in Christ as Messiah if you think it's all a myth anyway?
Hypocrisy and dishonesty tend to annoy non-theists. Apparently you and Rational don't mind, but the rest of us are touchy about things like that.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 09:55 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Biff the unclean
Hypocrisy and dishonesty tend to annoy non-theists. Apparently you and Rational don't mind, but the rest of us are touchy about things like that.
Funny how Opera Nut's blatant intellectual dishonesty doesn't seem to annoy you in the least.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-04-2003, 07:11 AM   #48
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Great Northeast
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Funny how Opera Nut's blatant intellectual dishonesty doesn't seem to annoy you in the least.
First of all care to list what Opera Nut's intellectual dishonesty is or are we just going to throw out assertions? From reading this thread it is obvious that Opera Nut at least tried to provide support for her position by quoting what Mainstream Jews say about Messianic Judaism. The Messianic Jew in question here has just arrogantly asserted, blustered and and essentially told everyone that it doesn't matter what they say, he is the only one that is right, because it is his religion so they don't know anything.

Also reference the other Messianic Jew thread where he proclaimed that the only difference between him and Mainstream Jews it that they are still waiting for the Messiah. And that is the ONLY difference. Not withstanding the whole divine Messiah of Christians (which he proclaims to be) versus Human Messiah (which the Jews are waiting for) issue.

With so many core doctrinal differences between the two (Mainstream Jews and Messianic Jews) don't you think the intellectual dishonesty is on the side that calls themselves something they are not?

Besides the idea here isn't whether anyone has the right to call themselves whatever they want, it is whether they are using that name to give a false impression of what they believe.
Wayne P is offline  
Old 07-04-2003, 07:57 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wayne P
First of all care to list what Opera Nut's intellectual dishonesty is or are we just going to throw out assertions?
It seems to me as patent as anything can be. If you can't see it, I can't help you.

Quote:
From reading this thread it is obvious that Opera Nut at least tried to provide support for her position by quoting what Mainstream Jews say about Messianic Judaism.
She has failed miserably. The flaws in her logic have been pointed out by several people already.

Quote:
The Messianic Jew in question here has just arrogantly asserted, blustered and and essentially told everyone that it doesn't matter what they say, he is the only one that is right, because it is his religion so they don't know anything.

Also reference the other Messianic Jew thread where he proclaimed that the only difference between him and Mainstream Jews it that they are still waiting for the Messiah.
Magus' arrogance or lack thereof is beside the point. His logic appears to me to be unassailable.

Quote:
And that is the ONLY difference. Not withstanding the whole divine Messiah of Christians (which he proclaims to be) versus Human Messiah (which the Jews are waiting for) issue.

With so many core doctrinal differences between the two (Mainstream Jews and Messianic Jews) don't you think the intellectual dishonesty is on the side that calls themselves something they are not?
Which side would that be? Maybe its the mainstream Jews who "say they are Jews, but are not". (Rev. 2:9)

Quote:
Besides the idea here isn't whether anyone has the right to call themselves whatever they want, it is whether they are using that name to give a false impression of what they believe.
I don't see Messianic Jews doing that.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-04-2003, 09:44 AM   #50
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
It seems to me as patent as anything can be. If you can't see it, I can't help you.
She has failed miserably. The flaws in her logic have been pointed out by several people already.
Maybe you could try because all I see are your assertions too. Opera Nut's logic still looks perfectly intact from here
Biff the unclean is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.