FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2002, 02:31 AM   #111
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Devilnaut:
<strong>I really wonder if Vander thinks he has anyone fooled. I can't imagine so.</strong>
You can fool all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time. Vanderzyden has fooled one person permanently. He's not blinkered, he has the visual acuity of a cave fish.

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 07:54 AM   #112
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 417
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Oolon Colluphid:
<strong>

You can fool all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time. Vanderzyden has fooled one person permanently. He's not blinkered, he has the visual acuity of a cave fish.

Oolon</strong>

Speaking of cave fishes - wans't Vanderzyden trying to argue that the cave fish's lumps of nonfunctioning eye tissue were placed there as an "aesthetically pleasing" design feature? Doggone it, he didn't even accuse anyone of offending him before abandoning that argument...

Oops. Come to think of it, my previous paragraph was quite offensive. Mr. Vanderzyden, I apologize for the previous paragraph, and retract it with complete humility. What I meant to say was:

Speaking of cave-fish, wasn't that brilliantly insightful commentator, Mr. Vanderzyden, gracing a large number of ingrateful commoners with a simply inspirational argument that the "seemingly" useless eye-tissue of the cave-fish was but a tribute to and blessing of the grace of the Creator, in all its aesthetically pleasing wonder?

Yet, for what must be an unassailably sound reason, based on his impeccable sense of integrity, Mr. Vanderzyden appears to have suddenly abandoned the thread altogether, leaving all partipants to speculate about what utter jaw-dropping argumentative thrashings they had been spared. And leaving some, myself included, to speculate as to "why"...

Perhaps it was the utter lack of thankfulness on behalf of the ignorant masses for the unnecessary gift of a paradigm-shifting wealth of wisdom bestowed upon them by Mr. Vandrrzyden himself. Or, more likely, I think, it was the dishonorable, insulting behavior whereby certain mental-peons, with ideas amounting to dog dirt not worthy of the soles of Mr. Vanderzyden's shoes, actually had the unthinkable nerve to bring Mr. Vanderzyden's arguments into question.

Mr. Vanderzyden, sir, if you have spared your invaluable time to read this far, I humbly ask you to show these fiends what's what. Oolon, with the cave fish reference above, almost seems to be taunting you with your sudden silence in that thread (despicable!!!) I beg you, put him in his place!

Humbly (and, just in case, apologetically),

-Baloo

[ October 22, 2002: Message edited by: Baloo ]</p>
Baloo is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 11:04 AM   #113
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 694
Post

You are to be commended, Baloo.

Vanderzyden is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 01:33 PM   #114
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>You are to be commended, Baloo.

</strong>
But... not actually responded to...
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 02:23 PM   #115
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>Rick: That was your last chance.</strong>
Not likely: if recent history is any guide, you'll provide many more opportunities to point-out your arrogance and ignorance.

Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 03:00 PM   #116
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Has anyone here not been delivered a 'last chance' ultimatum from vanderzyden? If he were serious about all of them, he would be long gone.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 03:30 PM   #117
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 694
Post

DD,

You will note that I avoid engaging several people in various forums. In fact, there are many complaints and apologies that result from my refusal to waste time in pettiness.

You and I have had similar discussions, and you know that my concern is not damage to my vanity. Rather, I encourage efficiency and sensibility. My aim is to discover the truth about ultimate things. You should know me well enough now that I have no ulterior "ambitions" or "agenda".


Vanderzyden
Vanderzyden is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 03:41 PM   #118
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

If you were interested in efficiency, you might be addressing the actual issues in this thread, rather than carping on again about who you will and will not speak to.

I have a suggestion for you, and for myself and many others here: If we all ignore everyone elses perhiperal issues and ad hominem remarks, which are pouring in great rivers from both sides of this debate, then the discussion will be breif, efficient and enjoyable.

Alternatively, we could all keep going as we are currently, and enjoy the varitey of emotions that it elicits, emotions of all varieties being the spice of life.

Devote a post or two to only the science, ignore the emotional rhetoric, and avoid using it yourself.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 04:37 PM   #119
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Wink

In fact, there are many complaints and apologies that result from my refusal to waste time in pettiness.

I took the liberty of looking at definitions of "petty." I found this rather interesting one:

petty-minded (disapproving) Someone who is petty or petty-minded is annoyed and offended by small and unimportant matters in a way that shows a limited and often selfish mind.
Mageth is offline  
Old 10-22-2002, 05:07 PM   #120
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>DD,

You will note that I avoid engaging several people in various forums. In fact, there are many complaints and apologies that result from my refusal to waste time in pettiness.</strong>
Vanderzyden, am I being "petty" by asking you to simply explain the unsubstantiated claims you have made?

Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>Also, with this configuration, how will you accomplish the management of fluid pressure, before and after the baby is born? In particular, how will you prevent the higher pressure of the umbilical flow from inflating the lungs? </strong>
Can you tell me why blood coming from the placenta is under "higher pressure"? Higher than what? Precisely where and how is this pressure being generated?

Quote:
Originally posted by Vanderzyden:
<strong>And, despite my explicit mention of it, you have not avoided the mixing of oxygenated and deoxgenated blood, which still occurs in many places in your "redesigned" system.
</strong>
Could you please point out in precisely which "many places" this mixing would occur?

And you still haven't answered my question about childbirth and doctors. Will you and your wife depend on this system running smoothly and optimally--dare I say flawlessly--when the time comes, or will you have a doctor on hand, just in case?
MrDarwin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.