FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-2003, 11:01 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default A false footnote in the AMB

I was looking at the Amplified Bible today, which seems to be a rather scholarly translation since it renders multiple meanings of words. However, I noticed this footnote in Genesis 2.

"The same essential chemical elements are found in man and animal life that are in the soil. This scientific fact was not known to man until recent times, but God was displaying it here."

Someone should tell them that the scientific fact is that life is similar to sea water, not soil.

This brings up another question: "If God made man from soil, why is there still soil?"
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 11:03 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default

There is this footnote to Gen 5:
"It is now well known that the age of mankind cannot be reckoned in years from the facts listed in genealogies, for there are numerous known intentional gaps in them. For example, as B. B. Warfield (Studies in Theology) points out, the genealogy in Matt. 1:1-17 omits the three kings, Ahaziah, Jehoash, and Amaziah, and indicates that Joram (Matt. 1:8) begat Uzziah, who was his great-great-grandson. The mistaking of compressed genealogies as bases for chronology has been very misleading. So far, the dates in years of very early Old Testament events are altogether speculative and relative, and the tendency is to put them farther and farther back into antiquity."

I guess we know that YEC's won't be using the AMP.
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 11:52 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Our chemical composition is a poor match for dirt, which is essentially powdered rock with some decayed organic material. We have lots of hydrogen but essentially no silicon, while rocks are the opposite.

Here is the typical dry composition of a microbial cell, from this page:

(by weight, by number):

Carbon - 50% - 30%
Oxygen - 20% - 9%
Nitrogen - 14% - 7%
Hydrogen - 8% - 54%
Phosphorus - 3% - 0.7%
Sulfur - 1% - 0.2%

Potassium - 1% - 0.2%
Sodium - 1% - 0.3%
Calcium - 0.5% - 0.1%
Magnesium - 0.5% - 0.15%
Chlorine - 0.5% - 0.1%

Iron - 0.2% - 0.02%
Manganese - 0.05% - 0.006%
Copper - 0.05% - 0.005%

By comparison, seawater's most abundant non-water elements are sodium and chlorine, which are 10 times more abundant than the next one, magnesium.

Also by comparison, the Earth's crust has the approximate composition (from this source):

Oxygen - 46.6% - 62.5%
Silicon - 27.1% - 20.7%
Aluminum - 8.1% - 6.4%
Iron - 5% - 2.0%
Calcium - 3.6% - 1.9%
Sodium - 2.8% - 2.6%
Potassium - 2.6% - 1.4%
Magnesium - 2.1% - 1.9%
Titanium - 0.46% - 0.21%
Carbon - 0.19% - 0.34%
lpetrich is offline  
Old 04-13-2003, 07:16 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 385
Default

hmm.. I woud've expected more titanium. Go figure.
Nickle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.