Freethought & Rationalism Archive

NiGhT SpAwN · 01-01-2002, 12:17 AM

no you're assuming as usual. Actually my girlfriend and other members of jesus online told me that by arguing with you that I was getting the word out the wrong way. And she said that my profile doesn't help in getting out the right way either.
please find out before you assume something. thanks

not a theist · 01-01-2002, 01:51 AM

<a href="http://www.rice.edu/armadillo/Sciacademy/riggins/thermo.htm" target="_blank">http://www.rice.edu/armadillo/Sciacademy/riggins/thermo.htm</A>

Orpheous99 · 01-01-2002, 02:45 AM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN:

Actually we do have evidence, but that's a different thread there, genius

Where is this so-called evidence for the existence of your god and creationism? The bible isn't a reliable, nor unbiased source.

Try any and every one. Give me a link that gives real, honest evidence for evolution. Not made up stuff.

We have. Too bad you can't say the same for cretinism.

ok...point?

Point is that cretinist have nothing and never provide ANY credible, verifible, nor unbiased evidence for cretinism.

Hey, notto, is this thread about my site? if you have a prob with it, guess what....TOO BAD!!!

Of course it is about your site since it is a load of crap because you don't have clue one about what evolution is and you prefer fairy tales instead.

Also, I'd like to ask this question:
Why is it that evolutionists all give me different definitions/comments on 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?

Where?

Orpheous99 · 01-01-2002, 02:50 AM

Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN:

Sniff, sniff... I smell a troll, since no body could be this stupid or ignorant of reality.

Orpheous99 · 01-01-2002, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Daggah:


I see you changed your profile. Guess you decided that "showing the evolutionists the truth" thing didn't look all that appealing on second thought? If I went to a Christian board with the intent of "showing the Christians the truth," do you think I'd be able to claim to be open-minded enough to go there?

If you made that claim they would have banned you as soon as they had seen it listed there.

Queen of Swords · 01-01-2002, 06:35 AM

Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN:
I have been open-minded enough to come here, so why are you still making assumptions about my actions?

Those weren't assumptions, they were predictions. And judging from your prowess on the "Miracles" thread in RRP, I think he's right; you are quite confused and have a tendency to avoid questions.

theyeti · 01-01-2002, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN:


I notice, theyeti, that there are creation articles that give better proof than that, that shows how evolution isn't true.
My point for starting this thread is to ask a question. Why back up something that can't be proven right

I notice, Night Spawn, that you were very clear in requesting facts about evolution. Seeing as how you didn't dispute what I wrote, I take it you conceed these as valid facts. Don't try to shift the goals posts now.

theyeti

bluefugue · 01-01-2002, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Why back up something that can't be proven right

That's a loaded question, and really rather pointless. Obviously those who accept evolution "back it up" because they think it can be "proven right" -- and has been -- to the extent that any scientific theory can. (Keep in mind science does not work in absolute proofs, but by preponderance of evidence.)

ps418 · 01-01-2002, 11:48 AM

Nightspawn,

Rather than talking about ten different things, let's deal with one thing in detail. I'll start with a very basic fact:

New species have originated continuously over time.

I interpret this fact as a result of speciation/ ongoing evolutionary processes.

Now, how does your model of earth history explain this basic, incontrovertible fact?
And like I said, I'd like to discuss this fact in detail until we reach agreement before moving on to the next fact.

Patrick

[ January 01, 2002: Message edited by: ps418 ]

Dr Rick · 01-01-2002, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN:
...Might I add that neither side proves the other wrong or right...there are creation articles that give better proof than that, that shows how evolution isn't true.

Might you add which specific creation articles provide this "better proof? Citing the articles for all to see might lend some crediblity to your assertion.

Quote:

Why back up something that can't be proven right [?]

...such as belief in God.

01-01-2002, 06:35 AM	#26
Queen of Swords Contributor Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Canada. Finally. Posts: 10,155	Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN: <strong>I have been open-minded enough to come here, so why are you still making assumptions about my actions?</strong> Those weren't assumptions, they were predictions. And judging from your prowess on the "Miracles" thread in RRP, I think he's right; you are quite confused and have a tendency to avoid questions.

01-01-2002, 11:48 AM	#29
ps418 Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Louisville, KY, USA Posts: 1,840	Nightspawn, Rather than talking about ten different things, let's deal with one thing in detail. I'll start with a very basic fact: New species have originated continuously over time. I interpret this fact as a result of speciation/ ongoing evolutionary processes. Now, how does your model of earth history explain this basic, incontrovertible fact? And like I said, I'd like to discuss this fact in detail until we reach agreement before moving on to the next fact. Patrick [ January 01, 2002: Message edited by: ps418 ]</p>

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

01-01-2002, 12:17 AM	#21
NiGhT SpAwN Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: US Posts: 24	no you're assuming as usual. Actually my girlfriend and other members of jesus online told me that by arguing with you that I was getting the word out the wrong way. And she said that my profile doesn't help in getting out the right way either. please find out before you assume something. thanks

01-01-2002, 01:51 AM	#22
not a theist Regular Member Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not in Kansas. Posts: 199	<a href="http://www.rice.edu/armadillo/Sciacademy/riggins/thermo.htm" target="_blank">http://www.rice.edu/armadillo/Sciacademy/riggins/thermo.htm</A>

01-01-2002, 02:45 AM	#23
Orpheous99 Banned Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada Posts: 1,258	[QUOTE]Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN: Actually we do have evidence, but that's a different thread there, genius Where is this so-called evidence for the existence of your god and creationism? The bible isn't a reliable, nor unbiased source. Try any and every one. Give me a link that gives real, honest evidence for evolution. Not made up stuff. We have. Too bad you can't say the same for cretinism. ok...point? Point is that cretinist have nothing and never provide ANY credible, verifible, nor unbiased evidence for cretinism. Hey, notto, is this thread about my site? if you have a prob with it, guess what....TOO BAD!!! Of course it is about your site since it is a load of crap because you don't have clue one about what evolution is and you prefer fairy tales instead. Also, I'd like to ask this question: Why is it that evolutionists all give me different definitions/comments on 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? Where?

01-01-2002, 02:50 AM	#24
Orpheous99 Banned Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada Posts: 1,258	Originally posted by NiGhT SpAwN: Sniff, sniff... I smell a troll, since no body could be this stupid or ignorant of reality.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.