Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-18-2002, 09:40 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 640
|
I didn't say no one around, I've said no humans around. Or is this kind of thinking just another illustration of inherent value system that only humans matter? Do you think that no other species would have developed to this level of sentience if humans haven't?
|
02-18-2002, 09:51 PM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
|
alek0,
Or is this kind of thinking just another illustration of inherent value system that only humans matter? I don't know what this sentence means. Do you think that no other species would have developed to this level of sentience if humans haven't? Probably, yes. At any rate, I'm not disputing that there might be other possible valuing agents than humans. I'm disputing that value is "inherent" in diversity of life. You and I happen to value diversity of life because we recognize that a robust biosphere is supportive of human life, not because we sense some inherent value init. |
02-18-2002, 10:21 PM | #23 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-18-2002, 10:50 PM | #24 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Quote:
Quote:
Is there any famine today, which we do not have the food to feed ? Really, as an optimist I see 9 billion as not a bad cap to the world population. Given our incredibly inefficient food production and distribution techniques today, it seems quite possible to feed this peak before the inevitable decline begins occurring. |
||
02-18-2002, 11:04 PM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
In fact, sticking with the food theme, and my unfashionable optimism, let me remind that a high proportion of famines are politically caused.
We interpret this as a natural shortage of food. The Irish Potato Famine, the Ukrainian famine, the Ethiopian famine, these are deliberate means by which people have been politically controlled. Behind the scenes of desperate hunger, we often forget the political causes of famine. Many countries (Mongolia and Malaysia spring to mind) have strong national policies of urbanisation. Governments and organisations know that by too easily supporting people in crisis, the significant social shifts necessary for longterm prosperity will not happen. |
02-18-2002, 11:35 PM | #26 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: India
Posts: 2,340
|
Quote:
I dont deny that education and women's liberalisation will solve these problems long term. However, in the interim, its necessary to curb the already exploding population. Quote:
Does that justify us breeding indiscrimnately so that noone survives tomorrow's world ?! - Sivakami. [ February 19, 2002: Message edited by: Sivakami S ]</p> |
||
02-18-2002, 11:38 PM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: India
Posts: 2,340
|
Quote:
If we dont take control of our growth rates, nature will, in her own brutal way. - Sivakami. |
|
02-19-2002, 07:02 AM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
|
Quote:
But the theme seems to be, the city-dwellers win. There is no population problem. It doesn't matter that someone values an obscure moth, their standards are subsumed by the city dwellers who need th space. And my argument is, if we value everyone's ideal, then we MUST leave some spaces untounched, unpopulated, unlittered, unbuilt. Otherwise we are NOT respecting their values "as well". Hence, all of their population & food capacity calculations, which seem to be the only thing that matters to them, MUST take out all of the land belonging to those who feel differently. Don't you think? |
|
02-19-2002, 09:37 AM | #29 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 75
|
Rhea, you asked me what my limit would be on the issue of population. I honestly cannot answer that question because I don't know what future technologies will be capable of. If space travel develops and our environment becomes the solar system or the galaxy instead of earth, I'd say no limit. Otherwise, the limit would be when human suffering becomes much worse and the cause is proven to be overpopulation rather than underdevelopment. I don't think we've reached that stage yet.
|
02-19-2002, 10:11 AM | #30 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
|
Polly, you appear to be saying that there is absolutely nothing on this earth that matters or is of value beyond human lives.
There is no value in showing beautiful things to children. No value in sharing resources with other natural things... You do not mention anything at all expect humans and the resources needed to sustain them. I find this very interesting, and very foreign. Do you ever like to look out a window? Is it okay with you if all windows go away because there is no room for them anymore? Just curious. I find that POV to be very, very foreign to me. But more to the point, I am surprised when people think I should adopt it for some reason... Like them not wanting to make any sacrifices to respect the desires of others to value something besides human existance with no (absolutely no) comment on quality of life. Curious to me! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|