FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2003, 12:11 AM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enid OK
Posts: 91
Default

Looks like I forgot something....

Quote:
Originally posted by philechat
What the f*ck? The Roman empire fell apart at 5th century, and Islam didn't come in at least 200 years later. It was caused by a series of complicated factors including, but not limited to, barbarian invasion, Rome's loss of soldiers (early Christians refused to bear arms), the corruption that necessarily happen after a long period of monarchy, and the disregard of cultural perservation among the early Christians. And I think there was also a bubonic plague going on at that time.
That's true--the plague had a lot to do with a lot of it as well.

What philechat said.
Clara Listensprechen is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 12:13 AM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enid OK
Posts: 91
Default Islam is an Abrahamic religion

Quote:
Originally posted by Grizzly
Hello all,

I don't think this thread belongs in NARP. I'm moving it to GRD.

Grizzly
Don't know what NARP is, but I DO know that Islam is NOT a non-Abrahamic religion. This still ain't the right place for this topic.
Clara Listensprechen is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 12:34 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enid OK
Posts: 91
Default

Kalvan, that's an impressively detailed account you give, but in the last portion it's still missing a couple critical points...
Quote:
. At the Battle of Yarmuk in Syria in 636 the Moslems decisively defeated Heraclius and the Empire lost Syria and Palestine immediately and forever.
You're not counting the Mamelukes and the British when you say "forever".
Quote:
A little later they took Egypt and Carthage. They also moved east and conquered the Persians completely.
Not entirely. Magism had long morphed into Zoroasterism as the Persian state religion, and what happened there was a melding of Islam and Zoroasterism under the heading of Islam to avoid the paying of that tax levied on non-Muslim residents of a Muslim nation. The sum total of what was actually practiced wasn't exactly classic Islam either Shiya or Sunni. That it eventually became mainly Shiite rather than Sunni is of particular interest. This fell pretty much into the category of protesting the invading regime while avoiding conqueror's wrath.
Quote:
For the next eight centuries the Eastern Roman Empire shielded Eastern Europe from Islam, in spite of being weakened again by their catastrophic defeat by the Moslem Turks at Manzikert in 1071 and again in 1204 when fellow Christians of the Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople.
The fascinating details here that deserve to be included was that the Turks on the Eastern front hadn't converted yet to Islam, and I'm refering to the fact that they were unconverted until the thirteenth century, first convert being Osman (Othman), the founder of the Ottoman Empire--converted to Islam by an ex-Christian Greek of high social rank, no less. The Eastern part of the Empire was successful in holding back the Saracen Muslems with full credit going to --ta da!--the Greeks and their infernal invention of what's called "Greek Fire". Southern Italy actually fell to Muslim invasion, tho not the northern part and that's explained mainly by the tough line-drawing Teutons. The central part including Rome was ransacked though saved from falling.
Quote:
The much reduced Eastern Empire finally fell in 1453 when Constantinople was captured by the Moslem Turks (or 1461 if you want to count the Empire of Trebizond, a Byzantine remnant along the southern coast of the Black Sea). Now it has been stated that this wasn’t the “Roman” Empire in the East but the “Byzantine” empire. The term Byzantine was not used until the 1700’s. Though they were Greek-speaking Christians ruled by autocrats and bore little resemblance to the pagan yeomen of the Roman Republic, they thought of themselves as “Roman”.
The missing details here are that the Islamic Empire had grown much larger than the Roman Empire ever had been, having captured all of the southern Mediteranean coast, crossing over the Gibralter strait and commanded all of Spain, having been stopped by the Franks. They were all over the Balkans, which later became a part of the Ottoman Empire.
Clara Listensprechen is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 01:42 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
That, as I'd said earlier, was already seriously fractured and main reason why Constantine got the hell outta Dodge (Rome) and moved his butt to safe ole Constantinople, taking Roman HQ with him. You guessed it--Praetorian Guards, who had turned themselves into whimsical emperor-makers (and breakers).
Constantine disbanded the Praetorian guard in 312 because they had sided with his rival Maxentius.
Quote:
You're not counting the Mamelukes and the British when you say "forever".
I said the Roman Empire lost Palestine and Syria. The Mamelukes and British are not Romans.
Quote:
Not entirely.
The Arabs conquered the Sassanid empire militarily and occupied the country. Whatever religious accomodation the conquered people subsequently may have arrived at to deal with their situation emotionally doesn't change that.
Quote:
The fascinating details here that deserve to be included was that the Turks on the Eastern front hadn't converted yet to Islam, and I'm refering to the fact that they were unconverted until the thirteenth century, first convert being Osman (Othman), the founder of the Ottoman Empire--converted to Islam by an ex-Christian Greek of high social rank, no less.
The Emperor Romanus Diogenes was defeated at Manzikert in 1071 by the Seljuk Turks under Alp Arslan. The Seljuks had converted to Islam over a hundred years before in 956.
Kalvan is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 05:38 PM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 175
Default

I like your name tyler d.
Paperstreet is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 04:36 PM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enid OK
Posts: 91
Default

And there ya have it, folks--as many different versions of Roman Empire history as there are versions of The Bible.

Consider the source, and consider the agenda of the source, do your own reading of more than 3 authors of hardcopy books at least and the more, the better.
Clara Listensprechen is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 04:46 PM   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enid OK
Posts: 91
Default

P.S. on a few fine points...about the Praetorian Guard, they developed a long track record of backstabbing, so it's reasonable to realize that simply announcing their disbandment didn't actually pull their teeth, what with the convoluted network of intrigue they'd established in the Rome 'hood. Telling Saddam to GIT didn't git the Fedayeen gone, either. Same principle involved here.

The Saracens had big trouble hanging on to their conquered Sassanid Empire in Persia, as the old Persian Empire was a state religion stronghold of considerable vigor. Whereas the religion was the prime issue with the Saracens, Persia simply morphed their religion into their prefered form of it. Persia had no problem morphing from Magism to Zoroasterism, so morphing again was no problem. SEE ALSO: Sufis.

Regardless of what tribe of Turks converted when, the Korasmian Turks and the Seljuk Turks were allied due to the fact that the Korasmians, upon their entry to the region, came upon the then-leader of the Seljuks, Aladdin, in the middle of a war which he was losing. Orthogrul, Othman's father, allied with the aforementioned Aladdin mid-battle and the two camps beat the enemy. Aladdin then gave Orthogrul a land grant as a reward, and this land abutted the area of land which was the Turk-held land that was closest to Constantinople (the Bithynia & Phrygia area, in the mountains, on the banks of Sanjar, naming it Surgut), in 1280. He repeatedly raided the Byzantine empire from that location and for his valor, also became Seljuk Sultan of Iconium.

Orthogrul's 3rd son, Othman (Osman) wrested Constantinople directly, taking advantage of a civil war between Andronicus The Elder and The Junior. Othman took Constantinople from no other Turk.

Othman was converted to Islam during his residency in Surgut by a Greek individual whose name still escapes my discovery, but I do have the information that he was one of the Michaelogi.


Clara Listensprechen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.