FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2002, 08:06 AM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Red face

In case anyone is reading this thread late, please read the original context I said the above in...
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-29-2002, 10:51 AM   #32
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 109
Post

Can someone help me with this?

Nature always has a purpose for variations in the human species (animal species, too). Sometimes the male animal (like seahorses) carries the eggs, etc.

WHAT IS NATURE'S PURPOSE FOR THE HOMOSEXUAL VARIATION?

I have tried for years to get an answer to this or even to explore it and come to my own conclusion but cannot settle on anything I feel is reasonably correct.
god-free-pen is offline  
Old 06-29-2002, 11:23 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: .
Posts: 1,653
Post

What is nature's purpose for any sort of enjoyable sexual activity which does not result in pregnancy?
bonduca is offline  
Old 06-29-2002, 11:28 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Post

The simple answer is that Nature has no purpose.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 06-29-2002, 02:33 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: hereabouts
Posts: 734
Post

I haven't read this book, but at <a href="http://www.daedalusbooks.com" target="_blank">www.daedalusbooks.com</a> you can buy a remaindered book called Biological Exuberance, which apparently is all about the fact that "homosexuality in its myriad forms has been scientifically documented in more than 450 species of mammals, birds, reptiles, insects, and other animals worldwide".
I don't know if the author has any theories on why it is so common. Anybody here read it?
One of the last sane is offline  
Old 06-30-2002, 01:14 AM   #36
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 40
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Princess of Peace:
<strong>Not all Christians are like that. Up here in Seattle, there's a Methodist minister who proclaimed he was gay at an annual conference, and the bishop didn't even throw him out! He still preaches with full authority.</strong>

Yeah, I live right up the street from that particular church. I remember the story and was really quite impressed. The congregation also was very supportive of him. It certainly is an exception to the rule though. I used to live in Pittsburgh and I can't imagine people reacting the same way there.
Jezebel is offline  
Old 06-30-2002, 12:35 PM   #37
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA, USA
Posts: 212
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by One of last of the sane:
<strong>I haven't read this book, but at <a href="http://www.daedalusbooks.com" target="_blank">www.daedalusbooks.com</a> you can buy a remaindered book called Biological Exuberance, which apparently is all about the fact that "homosexuality in its myriad forms has been scientifically documented in more than 450 species of mammals, birds, reptiles, insects, and other animals worldwide".
I don't know if the author has any theories on why it is so common. Anybody here read it?</strong>
Read it when it came out as a new book in my school library (I was bored). Well, more I skimmed it - it's a pretty thick book. I got the impression that some of the examples were really stretching. His example of male giraffes getting visibly aroused while necking each other in territorial battles, then the winner mounting the loser, sounds more to me like a dominance thing than a homosexual thing, for example. I think a lot of the other behavior was explained as subordinate males unable to get access to the females 'making do' with one another instead (what this means, I don't know). It seemed like he was hell-bent on proving that this sort of thing is natural, and that a lot of the 'evidence' he presents was shoehorned into that bias.

But hell, I suppose the same could be said for any animal-behavior book, and as I said it's just a first impression based on skimming. YMMV.

- Jen
Yellow3 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.