FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-24-2003, 09:26 PM   #21
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 279
Default

Quote:
The afterlife. Living in a world that has been restored to with every creature (at least those living in an eternal relationship with God) serving its original purpose without being affected by the disease of sin and the disastrous effects it wrought in this world.
Why would the afterlife be like this? Assuming a literalist point of veiw, it didn't take man too very long to bring sin into the garden, and man had a far more personal relationship with god then than he does now. It seems extremely unlikely that man would not have introduced sin into the next world, unless death changes man, either through act of god or loss of physical body. In either case, the person you are is truly dead, and this new person who resembles you is all that is left. I do see other possibilities, but they are equally dismal, and I'm hoping you can present one that isn't such.



Quote:
The afterlife is much more than just playing harps on clouds or sitting around looking at God.
I would hope so. Hell would be honestly preferable to that.

Quote:
It is all about living in a relationship with God that lasts forever. A relationship like we were intended to have in the beginning.
Philosoft answers this more concisely than I could hope.

Quote:
Of course, some will choose to live without a relationship with God for eternity. I hope no one here will make that choice.
All right, your beliefs in the afterlife are strikingly similar to those of a Unitarian friend of mine, and I think I have a handle on it. The question stands, though: Why would you want to live for eternity? Can you honestly imagine anything that could keep you happy forever without some fundemental change to your being?

Amaranth
Amaranth is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 09:29 PM   #22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 279
Default

Quote:
You and I will never agree here. Being omnipotent doesn't mean that he forces his will on his creation, it just means he could do so if he wanted to.

Instead, God allows us to make choices as to how we will spend our eternity - loving him, or not loving him.
Man had a very personal relationship with god in Eden, and still brought sin into the world. Would not mankind, already armed with knowledge of what sin is, only repeat this failure in the afterlife if left to their free will?

Quote:
Someone who acted through force of their will would be a dictator - that is not the God of the Bible.
We all know we disagree on this, so let's please touch it in another thread. Please?

Amaranth
Amaranth is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 09:29 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by theIPU
Ah yes, there is much to explore, but here's the problem with an eternal afterlife; after you've done all of which you described above, you will still have an ETERNITY left. THAT would get boring.
No it wouldn't. You seem to be assuming that once you die time stops and all you can study is in the past. Why assume that? There is always somthing new happening-new dramas unfolding.
Maybe most people just have more limits to their imagination than I do. Oh well.
GeoTheo is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 09:32 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outer Mongolia
Posts: 4,091
Cool

quote <Someone who acted through force of their will would be a dictator - that is not the God of the Bible. Kevin>


Rather than a dictator, the god of the bible seems to me to be just a plain DICK.
JGL53 is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 09:39 PM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 279
Default

Quote:
No it wouldn't. You seem to be assuming that once you die time stops and all you can study is in the past. Why assume that? There is always somthing new happening-new dramas unfolding.
Sure, but if I've seen a red panda bear juggle 5 chainsaws 200 times, the show isn't going to be more interesting because the panda bear is blue this time, or is juggling 6 chain saws.


Quote:
Maybe most people just have more limits to their imagination than I do. Oh well.
OooOOooo...Ad hominem? We're wrong becuase we aren't as imaginative? All right, I can handle this game...how about this:

On the contrary - Were you better able to imagine eternity, you would understand perfectly how boring it would eventually get.

Amaranth
Amaranth is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 10:26 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Default

Consider this. Our current best estimates say that the universe is somewhere near 14 billion years old. Compared to an eternity, that is less the blink of an eye. How long would you estimate it would take you to do absolutely everything that it is possible to do? A trillion years, 10 Trillion? More? That is still nothing at all in the face of an eternity. Even after 100 trillion years, you might as well have just started. Even after the largest number of years you can possibly think of, you still have just as much time ahead of you as the day you started. How could you possibly not get terminally bored?

The idea of eternal life is horrifying to me.
wade-w is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 11:09 PM   #27
GrandDesigner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This isnt directed at Amaranth, but I haven't seen a red panda bear juggle 5 chainsaws and I'd like to. But to those who think eternity must be boring, read on.

Sure, but if I've seen a red panda bear juggle 5 chainsaws 200 times, the show isn't going to be more interesting because the panda bear is blue this time, or is juggling 6 chain saws.

Ok, I'll save this post or try and remember it as long as I can. I can ask any of you to do the same. But also try and remember this next part because if you dont, then it may seem a little less interesting.

When you're juggling 5 chainsaws, sometime, look out at the spectators. If I remember this post, I will keep an eye out. When you see me looking back, slowly look down and try and guess the colour of your panda fur. I dont know how they perceive colour so it may not be called 'red', if you see what I'm saying.

At that moment, remember that you once thought or suggested eternity might get a little boring. Then realize you're a panda, and even though you've seen pandas juggling chainsaws, you are now the panda watching the spectators.

There's an infinte amount of possibilites. I imagine it'll take eternity to experience everything, including this life here.

Grand ol' Designer
 
Old 04-24-2003, 11:26 PM   #28
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Thumbs down

Quote:
I imagine it'll take eternity to experience everything, including this life here.
No, no, nooooooooooooooooooo. You imagine wrong.
The Naked Mage is offline  
Old 04-24-2003, 11:58 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
Default

Sorry If I ofended you but perhaps you are just not a creative person. Creative people enjoy creating. It does not bore them. You seem to be making an analogy between life and watching a soap opera for the umpteenth time. If I were to look at it that way I would be bored also. But I don't.
You don't understand eternity, you just understand your own analogy of it.
Here is another analogy: God is eternal. He is also creative. He created a world that at it's building block level-the quantum level, it is indeterminate. Perhaps God knows how it will all turn out. We can't. assuming we won't be able to know in the after life their will always be somthing new.
GeoTheo is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 12:09 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wade-w
Consider this. Our current best estimates say that the universe is somewhere near 14 billion years old. Compared to an eternity, that is less the blink of an eye. How long would you estimate it would take you to do absolutely everything that it is possible to do? A trillion years, 10 Trillion? More? That is still nothing at all in the face of an eternity. Even after 100 trillion years, you might as well have just started. Even after the largest number of years you can possibly think of, you still have just as much time ahead of you as the day you started. How could you possibly not get terminally bored?

The idea of eternal life is horrifying to me.
For some reason you think of eternity as doing the same thing over and over again an infinite number of times. That doesn't make any sense. Variety is usually a good way to avoid boredom. In an eternity you could do a different thing everyday and still have an infinate number of choices left. I don't see how you could have much more variety than that. Maybe if you had to spend eternity in a phone booth it would get boring but not in an infinate Universe.
GeoTheo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.