Normal

Yes, logic does follow scientific laws.

Hawkingfan

Fallacy.
Argumentum ad ignorantiam
Argumentum ad ignorantiam means "argument from ignorance." The fallacy occurs when it's argued that something must be true, simply because it hasn't been proved false.

Normal

What exactly am I claiming must be true?

Hawkingfan

So therefore, it is reasonable to believe in the existence of something with no evidence of it's existence?
That is unreasonable.
Also, see fallacy remarks above.

Normal

I believe it's reasonable to think that humans can't know everything that's knowable. Nowhere did I assert believe of something that lacks evidence, except for things being "unknowable" to humans, which you either believe or you don't.

Hawkingfan

That something exists concretely outside of science.

Hawkingfan

And I agree.
You most certainly assert belief in something that lacks evidence WHEN you mentioned things existing "unknowable" to humans. Which you can believe or not, reasonably or unreasonably.

Normal

Are you refering to the other dimension comment?

That was merely a possibility, I never asserted belief in those things.

Hawkingfan

As I've said for the millionth time, these all come from your brain.
From encarta.msn.com (search for "brain"):

The brain makes us conscious, emotional, and intelligent. Broca's area, a part of the cortex related to speech, is located in the frontal lobe. Wernicke's area, a part of the cortex related to the understanding of language, is located in the temporal lobe. Many other areas of the cerebral cortex have also been mapped according to their specific functions, such as vision, hearing, speech, emotions, language, and other aspects of perceiving, thinking, and remembering. Cortical regions known as associative cortex are responsible for integrating multiple inputs, processing the information, and carrying out complex responses.

Hawkingfan

Good for you. Because, it would be unreasonable to believe in them.