FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2003, 02:41 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
school administrators ordered her to use the words He, Him and His instead of three mentions of God in the lyrics.
Quote:
But Honer believed she would be a "liar and a hypocrite" to sing an edited version
I don't understand this. How does using a pronoun instead of the noun it represents make you a liar or hypocrite? Wouldn't god be smart enough to figure out that he is the "he", "him" and "his" in that song??
elmodog is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 03:28 PM   #12
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default Re: Re: Re: Girl sues for not being able to sing about "God"

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto
If the individual in question is in a public forum and brings her own soapbox, she can say anything she wants to. But when she is part of an officially sanctioned event on public property and the school district pays for the microphone, the school district does have a right and an obligation to keep religious practices out of the speech.
Practices yes..... I made it clear that religious practices are not to be protected by the freedom of speech. Prayer and hymn singing are a religious practice. Quoting from a religious document of any kind to support a speech is not a religious practice. Do we agree on the term practice now? or are you saying that quoting from any religious document should be prohibited under the Separation of Church and State for a student initiated graduation speech?
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 05:45 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

This thread is about a hymn. But the school district has a broader right to control the content of the student's speech, including her language and references, as long as she is speaking at an official school event. This is one of those cases where her rights to free speech are not absolute. I don't know what is so hard about this.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 08:15 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Default

- the content of the student's speech, including her language and references, as long as she is speaking at an official school event. This is one of those cases where her rights to free speech are not absolute. -

So she should be allowed to say anything she wants to as long as it agrees with what you think is appropriate?
I thought there was something in the 1st amendment about not having the right to express your religeon curtailed. She can say whatever she wants about her faith. Just because she sings it or states it or tap dances it doesnt mean the school or the state is pushing any type of faith on anybody. She is a free individual. If she wants to say "I love god" or " The Great Pumpkin is my saviour" she can. The school does NOT have any right to censor her beliefs. Any more than it does you or me.
Dune is offline  
Old 05-31-2003, 09:33 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default

Does one really have a right to free speech at a graduation ceremony? If I'd stood up and started talking (or singing) during mine, they'd have booted my butt out of there, even if I'd done it when it was my moment on the stage and no one else was speaking.

The school is putting on this event. They are granting her a few minutes to do a song. That doesn't have to mean they are granting her free reign. They don't have to let her say or sing a single thing. There is no RIGHT for her or anyone to use their ceremony in a way they don't approve of.

Dal
Daleth is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 12:45 AM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dune
So she should be allowed to say anything she wants to as long as it agrees with what you think is appropriate?
Not me, the school that is providing the microphone and her audience.

I'm pretty sure that the school would not allow her to do a strip tease, or give a speech glorifying Hitler, or sacrifice an animal, and I think the school would be within its rights.

Quote:
I thought there was something in the 1st amendment about not having the right to express your religeon curtailed. . . .
The 1st amendment guarantees her right to exercise her religion, and guarantees her fellow students' rights not to be coerced into participating in a religious exercise.

Like I said, she is perfectly free to get a soapbox in a public square and sing her song. She just can't do it as part of an official school event.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 05:53 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

She is not being told that she cannot practice her religion. She is being told that she cannot force her views on other people during a state sponsered event. The First Amendment does not give anyone free reign to force their views on people when the state is footing the bill. They do have the right -- and the responsibility -- to limit what she is allowed to talk (or sing) about.

If the government goes into her church and tells her she can't sing her song there -- that would be infringing on her constitutional rights.

I can't tell you how sick I am of people with a martyr complex wasting tax payor money because they don't think it's fair being told that their rights do not include infringing on the rights of other people.:boohoo:
Jewel is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 06:19 PM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Default

I can't tell you how sick I am of people with a martyr complex wasting tax payor money because they don't think it's fair being told that their rights do not include infringing on the rights of other people.

Except when it comes to athiest telling thiests they cant openly display thier faith.

So how is someone saying I love god offensive? if you dont believe in god, its just a silly thing other people say. Saying Buddah is keen or Mohammed is the truth isnt offensive, and if you are offended by it, you should ask yourself why? Does it slander others or you? No. Its just an affermation of one persons belief.
Saying "Vishnu is the truth, and I believe" is not shoving down anyones throat. However, stifling someone because you dont believe as they do is shoving athiesm down their throats.
Dune is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 06:27 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dune
So how is someone saying I love god offensive? if you dont believe in god, its just a silly thing other people say. Saying Buddah is keen or Mohammed is the truth isnt offensive, and if you are offended by it, you should ask yourself why? Does it slander others or you? No. Its just an affermation of one persons belief.

Saying "Vishnu is the truth, and I believe" is not shoving down anyones throat. However, stifling someone because you dont believe as they do is shoving athiesm down their throats.
It is offensive when a Christian uses a publicly funded forum to push their propaganda. That's all we are talking about here.

I would say the same thing about a Muslim using a graduation ceremony to say There is No God But Allah and Mohammed is His Prophet, and I imagine you would be with me on that.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-01-2003, 07:06 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dune

Except when it comes to athiest telling thiests they cant openly display thier faith.

So how is someone saying I love god offensive? if you dont believe in god, its just a silly thing other people say. Saying Buddah is keen or Mohammed is the truth isnt offensive, and if you are offended by it, you should ask yourself why? Does it slander others or you? No. Its just an affermation of one persons belief.
Saying "Vishnu is the truth, and I believe" is not shoving down anyones throat. However, stifling someone because you dont believe as they do is shoving athiesm down their throats.
She can openly display her faith all she wants -- on her own time. She can stand on a street corner and tell passers by that they are going to Hell. Doesn't bother me. However, the state is not obligated to accomodate her or anyone else with a religious agenda when the state is paying for the event and venue. This does not infringe upon her rights in any fashion and it isn't shoving atheism down her throat to limit her speech in a state sponsered forum.
Jewel is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.