FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2002, 11:37 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 527
Post

Wow that's quite alot of bases in a cell!

Yo, what would happen if one base in that cell was removed? Like from anywhere along the strand.
Would that change the whole DNA strand? Like change all the bases in 3s?
I'm sure there must be something to stop that happening you know what it is?
Thanks.
davidH is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 11:38 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by davidH:
Yo, what would happen if one base in that cell was removed?
Removed by chance, or removed by natural selection?

<img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 11:48 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by davidH:
<strong>Wow that's quite alot of bases in a cell!

Yo, what would happen if one base in that cell was removed? Like from anywhere along the strand.
Would that change the whole DNA strand? Like change all the bases in 3s?
I'm sure there must be something to stop that happening you know what it is?
Thanks.</strong>
In bacteria, probably, but more advanced cells contain their genetic information separated into chromosomes. What you're talking about is a frame shift mutation, and yes, it can cause massive changes. And yes, there are mechanisms to prevent it from occurring.
Daggah is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 11:52 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the edge
Posts: 509
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Daggah:
<strong>

In bacteria, probably, but more advanced cells contain their genetic information separated into chromosomes. What you're talking about is a frame shift mutation, and yes, it can cause massive changes. And yes, there are mechanisms to prevent it from occurring.</strong>
A frame shift might have profound consequences for the gene in which it occurred, but this wouldn't affect other genes on the same chromosome.
tribalbeeyatch is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 11:56 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Post

There may be short stretches of DNA between the points where one gene ends and where another's start codon begins (assuming they're in the same operon - and I'm thinking of motB and cheA of Salmonella typhimurium here). I don't think a loss of one base there would have serious consequences for the cell.

[ January 17, 2002: Message edited by: QueenofSwords ]</p>
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 12:13 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 226
Post

A single deletion will pretty much scramble all of the following information on that strand.
CodeMason is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 12:39 PM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 226
Post

Say we have the nucleotide sequence:
ATG__ GAT TAC ACT AAG TGA_ CAT
START Asp Tyr Thr Lys STOP His
The bold base is the one that's going to be deleted.

So now we have:
ATG__ GAT TCA CTA AGT GAC AT... and so on
START Asp Ser Leu Ser Asp ?...

Get the picture? Everything after that base removal is now scrambled.
But frameshifts have lead to beneficial, new information, for instance nylon waste product metabolizing bacteria.
And, although very rare, a single base addition later on, further down in the code, can restore the rest of the sequence so that only a few genes were radically altered. I suspect this is what happened with the nylon-eating bacteria.

[ January 17, 2002: Message edited by: CodeMason ]</p>
CodeMason is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 01:03 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 125
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by CodeMason:
<strong>Say we have the nucleotide sequence:
ATG__ GAT TAC ACT AAG TGA_ CAT
START Asp Tyr Thr Lys STOP His
The bold base is the one that's going to be deleted.

So now we have:
ATG__ GAT TCA CTA AGT GAC AT... and so on
START Asp Ser Leu Ser Asp ?...

Get the picture? Everything after that base removal is now scrambled.
</strong>
This is pedantic, but a frame shift mutation requires a base pair be deleted. I'm sure CodeMason knows this, but for the slower ones in the class it's an important distinction. DNA is not a single strand but a pair of complementary strands.

If one (or even a fews) base is deleted/destroyed/removed from one strand, it can be accurately replaced because it's complement still exists in the complementing DNA strand. Molecular machinery exists in the cell that recognizes the missing nucleotide and puts the proper one into the open spot by "reading" the complementary base opposite the hole. This redundancy (two DNA strands) helps to protect the integrity of the information encoded from such deletions.

Stryder

[ January 17, 2002: Message edited by: stryder2112 ]</p>
stryder2112 is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 01:32 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by stryder2112:
<strong>

This is pedantic, but a frame shift mutation requires a base pair be deleted. I'm sure CodeMason knows this, but for the slower ones in the class it's an important distinction. DNA is not a single strand but a pair of complementary strands.

If one (or even a fews) base is deleted/destroyed/removed from one strand, it can be accurately replaced because it's complement still exists in the complementing DNA strand. Molecular machinery exists in the cell that recognizes the missing nucleotide and puts the proper one into the open spot by "reading" the complementary base opposite the hole. This redundancy (two DNA strands) helps to protect the integrity of the information encoded from such deletions.

Stryder

[ January 17, 2002: Message edited by: stryder2112 ]</strong>

But this is not foolproof. No DNA repair mechanism is. Otherwise, there would be no evolution.

[ January 17, 2002: Message edited by: MortalWombat ]</p>
MortalWombat is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 01:38 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the edge
Posts: 509
Post

I can't tell whether everybody is trying to say the same thing or there is some disagreement here. A frameshift within a gene will profoundly alter that gene, but other genes up or downstream of the frameshift will still be in frame with their start codons, so they will still be expressed normally.
tribalbeeyatch is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.