FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-03-2003, 01:38 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

My answer to the "Why apologists?" question? Because god definitions are an invention of man, and man continues in refining the definitions, working out the kinks.
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-03-2003, 02:42 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Lauderale, FL
Posts: 5,390
Default

Aradia,
I'm not sure, but I think lugotorix was making a joke

At least that's how I take it.
Llyricist is offline  
Old 06-03-2003, 02:46 PM   #33
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: US
Posts: 390
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Llyricist
Aradia,
I'm not sure, but I think lugotorix was making a joke

At least that's how I take it.
I read it both ways, and chose the path of caution.

Mageth: No problem.
Aradia is offline  
Old 06-03-2003, 06:53 PM   #34
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional
It is because traditional monotheists (Jews, Christians, Muslims) have a weak God who needs to be pampered to constantly, and defended from encroaching. Theirs is a delicate God who needs to be placated (by a sweet savour of roasted flesh or by faith in His son) lest he become angry.

Actually apologetics is more "defence of the faith" than "defence of God", so the point your cousin raised isn't relevant. Apologetics is for keeping individual sheep from leaving the flock, and for winning more sheep into the flock.

Thanks, it's not that I didn't know, but rather I was curious to see how apologist would answer this question.
TheGreatInfidel is offline  
Old 06-03-2003, 08:13 PM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
Posts: 96
Default


Quote:
TheGreatInfidel:
When I use analogies I use them in support of a definition already given, but you seemed to have forgoten the definition part.

Spare me anymore analogies and get to the point! BTW, I don't have a fundie-to-english dictionary so you'll have to explain in english.
I've been an atheist for more than 30 years now. Guess I must not be a TRUE atheist, eh?
wordfailure is offline  
Old 06-03-2003, 10:10 PM   #36
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 183
Wink

Quote:
I've been an atheist for more than 30 years now. Guess I must not be a TRUE atheist, eh?
Oops! I guess I misinterpreted you. But with good reason. Fundies usually give round-about statements that pose like answers but really don't say anything. For an example of that just see the answers Danielius has been giving in this thread.

How'd you like that fundie-to-english dictionary bit? Nice! Really...fundies have a whole language of their own! It must be the holy spook inside them.
TheGreatInfidel is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:15 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.