FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2003, 12:23 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Default

I am a homosexual.

I feel that pedophilia is vile.

There, now yguy's theory is bunk: not all homosexuals think pedophilia is fantastic.
Bree is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:26 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bree
I am a homosexual.

I feel that pedophilia is vile.
Thank you.

Quote:
There, now yguy's theory is bunk: not all homosexuals think pedophilia is fantastic.
Why the hell do you people keep putting words in my mouth?
yguy is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:29 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ronin
I'm sure glad the IIDB has the search function back in order again...for the refutations of Fr.Andrew's claims still apply and now I'll not have to go over the same old BS with the guy.

~ Over and out.
Thank you, my good man. This is the sort of thing I want to hear.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:35 PM   #34
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dangin
The one thing that kills me about the Rind study is that it doesn't seem to take into account that a lot of sex abuse is at the hands of family members. (who were also sexually abused in every case that I know of). So on top of the sexual abuse, you have, incest, and destruction of trust. Then add on people making it worse by covering it up, getting hysterical, or flat out being in denial.

I know too many women who were sexually abused by their fathers, (and how fucked up they are for years) to buy any of this apologetic bullshit, particularly when it seems to pretend that all these abused people who see no harm in it were abused by someone other than a "trusted" adult or family member.
dangin, I'm not clear on what you're saying here... probably because it's hard to say because you feel so strongly. Can you clarify? (It's OK if you can't. I know it's a hard topic to address.) Also, from what I've read of the Rind study, all it seems to do is (like I keep saying) suggest that therapists should make less assumptions and should treat the victims of CSA for the symptoms they present with rather than symptoms they are presumed to have. I know people are probably hijacking the study and using it for apologist purposes, but is it apologist in itself?
Daleth is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:40 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Daleth
I'm not. If advocating for gay rights is linked to advocating pedophilia because both anre non-traditional, then advocating against hitting kids as a means of correction is linked the same way.
Rather than dissect your logic on this one, I'll just say the parallel seems to me conveniently capricious and distinctly lacking in intellectual depth.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:43 PM   #36
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Default Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
You guys owe it to yourselves to repudiate this insanity with everything you have.
And you owe it to yourself to repudiate this insanity with everything you have:

Quote:
From Scalia's dissent:
State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers's validation of laws based on moral choices. Every single one of these laws is called into question by today's decision; ...
I realize some of you (yguy) have problems with the subject due to personal experience with it, but those who are able need to make your objections known in no uncertain terms, lest those like myself be given any more reason than we already have to draw any connection between masturbation and bestiality (or pornography and adultery, or prostitution and adult incest).

Yguy, you sound as absurd as Scalia. Masturbation cannot possibly be considered a crime by any person with even the slightest sense of identity and empathy with his fellow humans. You have to be some sort of scary, detached sort of unfeeling robot not to laugh at the lunacy of the merest suggestion that such an idea be taken seriously. Yet Scalia's idiocy (and frankly, his barely disguised tittillation) is indistinguishable from yours.

Will you now clearly agree with or repudiate the notion that the state has the right to make masturbation or adultery a crime? If you can't do that, then I am afraid I have to conclude that you support bestiality and prostitution.
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:47 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Daleth
dangin, I'm not clear on what you're saying here... probably because it's hard to say because you feel so strongly. Can you clarify? (It's OK if you can't. I know it's a hard topic to address.) Also, from what I've read of the Rind study, all it seems to do is (like I keep saying) suggest that therapists should make less assumptions and should treat the victims of CSA for the symptoms they present with rather than symptoms they are presumed to have. I know people are probably hijacking the study and using it for apologist purposes, but is it apologist in itself?
Yes, you are correct, I am basing this on the apologists, but also the link that Helen provided seems to point to flawed "preconceived ideas or desires" that have influenced the study.

Personally, I don't have all that strong a feelings about it. I was never abused, no one in my family was abused. I just (most of us do) know a lot of women who got twisted up by sexual abuse, and it was always at the hand of a parent, relative, baby sitter, or other trusted adult.

So to say that they think the sex was not bad, or even good for them is one thing. But it completely disregards the idea of "trust" that must exist between children and adults of these relationships.

The vast minority of child abuse is perpetrated by total strangers. The rape of an adult woman is usually by someone she knows. This is even more so with children.
dangin is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 12:54 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
I also think pedophilia and overeating and other addictions are related, if only distantly.
It should be easy to get an idea of whether known pedophiles are proportionately more overweight than the adult population in general, just by observation.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 01:01 PM   #39
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
It should be easy to get an idea of whether known pedophiles are proportionately more overweight than the adult population in general, just by observation.
LOL, Helen!
Daleth is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 01:02 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by Autonemesis
Yguy, you sound as absurd as Scalia.
Gee, thanks.

Quote:
Masturbation cannot possibly be considered a crime by any person with even the slightest sense of identity and empathy with his fellow humans.
I don't think masturbation should necessarily be considered a crime, but that is hardly central to Scalia's thesis or mine.

Quote:
You have to be some sort of scary, detached sort of unfeeling robot not to laugh at the lunacy of the merest suggestion that such an idea be taken seriously. Yet Scalia's idiocy (and frankly, his barely disguised tittillation) is indistinguishable from yours.

Will you now clearly agree with or repudiate the notion that the state has the right to make masturbation or adultery a crime?
Not just no - Hell no.

Quote:
If you can't do that, then I am afraid I have to conclude that you support bestiality and prostitution.
You are, of course, welcome to come to whatever <deleted by moderator>.
yguy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.