FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: Abortion, terminate when?
Never 19 12.18%
Up to one month 5 3.21%
Up to two months 7 4.49%
Up to three months 42 26.92%
Up to four months 14 8.97%
up to five months 7 4.49%
Up to six months 25 16.03%
Up to seven months 1 0.64%
Up to eight months 17 10.90%
Infanticide is OK 19 12.18%
Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2003, 04:53 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Darwin
Posts: 1,466
Default Slippery slope for abortion argument, terminate when?

The slippery slope argument is often used on this topic but I feel the the slipperly slope is self correcting. So I posted a poll to put the sllppery slope argument to the real test.

So just assume the fetus/embryo is healthy right from the start and the mother decides for whatever reason the terminate. At what stage of the pregnancy would should she draw the line?
crocodile deathroll is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 05:35 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .nl
Posts: 822
Default

I voted three months. After my experience in the tram this morning, with a small girl repeadtedly (and loudly) singing the first two lines of "Jingle Bells", and her dad's impotence to do anything about this, infanticide looks more and more appealing.


"Oh, for an hour of Herod!"
VonEvilstein is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 05:43 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
So just assume the fetus/embryo is healthy right from the start and the mother decides for whatever reason the terminate. At what stage of the pregnancy would should she draw the line?
Up to the point of brain and nervous system development that supports more then reflexive reaction without question, after that viability of the fetus should be determined on an individual basis by a woman's medical doctor, and the appropriate determination should be made based upon that conclusion. I support late-term abortion in the case of fetal defect and to save the life of the mother, but I support reasonable restrictions past 3 months.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 05:54 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 927
Default

I voted for 5 months because that is when viability comes into the picture. Personally I would push that number even further out for serious fetal abnormalities.

I can honestly see instances where infanticide would be a merciful option (like in cases of war/ethnic genocide where death will not be quick, or in severe famine where death from starvation is pretty much guaranteed) I don't think it should be legal here in the US, but I would not think ill (for example) of a Jewish mother who smothered her infant rather than let the Nazis take it from her to do who the hell knows what during WWII.
frostymama is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 08:20 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,842
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by frostymama
I can honestly see instances where infanticide would be a merciful option (like in cases of war/ethnic genocide where death will not be quick, or in severe famine where death from starvation is pretty much guaranteed) I don't think it should be legal here in the US, but I would not think ill (for example) of a Jewish mother who smothered her infant rather than let the Nazis take it from her to do who the hell knows what during WWII.
Don't you just love being a parent and having to think about this kind of stuff? *Shudder.*

The poll: Off the top of my head, I picked 4 months.
Ab_Normal is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 08:37 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 927
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ab_Normal
Don't you just love being a parent and having to think about this kind of stuff? *Shudder.*

The poll: Off the top of my head, I picked 4 months.
Yes, having kids did sick things to my brain for some reason. I never used to think about stuff like that before.

The sad thing is that there have probably been more mothers than I would like to imagine who have been placed in that kind of awful situation. It would be my absolute worst nightmare. I would hope that I would have the strength to make sure my children didn't suffer if I were in their shoes. The truth is that it would probably drive me insane.
frostymama is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 08:46 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Default

Hey, let's all rent sophie's choice for a warm happy moment of parenthood.

I hear you though. A new part of us grows to love the children we make. Loosing a child changes that growth of unmeasurable love into a dead spot of unmeasurable anguish.
dangin is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 09:35 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 929
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dangin
Hey, let's all rent sophie's choice for a warm happy moment of parenthood.
I was about to advise frostymama not to watch that movie if she has not yet already seen it.

But, to lighten things up a little:

I think the line should be drawn at about 18 or so years after birth. Think of how much easier it would be to discipline teenagers and keep them in line: "Hey, cut that out! I can still abort you, you know!"

Back to serious mode, a "slippery slope" is a fallacious argument form. Someone who explicitly appeals to a slippery slope is in effect admitting that their argument is a bad one. It is admitting that I don't have an argument against taking step 1 so I'll argue against taking step 10 and hope that is sufficient to convince you not to take step 1. But if you are, say, 9 steps from the edge of the Grand Canyon and you want a better view, arguing against taking the 10th step is utterly beside the point if the question is the taking 6 or 7 steps.

A late term fetus can feel and experience and is viable if untimely ripped from the womb; an embryo, though it is biologically alive and genetically human, clearly is not a person. I like the Roe decision, I think it is socially and scientifically responsible: no restrictions first trimester (when something like 85% or more of abortions take place), some reasonable restrictions in the second, lots more (but not a total ban; e.g. severe abnormalities, life of the mother, and such) in the third (when it has developed a functional brain and is viable).

"Personhood," like "baldness," is not an all-or-nothing quality; it is emergent. To argue that since a 9 month fetus is clearly a functional person therefore a 9 day old fetus is, would be as ridiculous as arguing that since a 9 day old fetus is clearly not a functional person then a 9 month old fetus is not. (I suspect this is blatantly apparent to most people who post here, but for some reason some people just can't seem to grasp this point, so I went ahead and stated the should-be-obvious.)
Hobbs is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 10:14 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
Default

For purely elective abortions, that is, no medical problems in mother or fetus--no restrictions up to natural viability--6 months (I believe 25 weeks actually corresponds better to data on viability.)
JerryM is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 11:53 AM   #10
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by frostymama
I voted for 5 months because that is when viability comes into the picture. Personally I would push that number even further out for serious fetal abnormalities.

I can honestly see instances where infanticide would be a merciful option (like in cases of war/ethnic genocide where death will not be quick, or in severe famine where death from starvation is pretty much guaranteed) I don't think it should be legal here in the US, but I would not think ill (for example) of a Jewish mother who smothered her infant rather than let the Nazis take it from her to do who the hell knows what during WWII.
I have a *BIG* problem with basing it on viability. What happens as medical technology advances? What happens when the age of viability is pre-conception? (ie, an artificial womb and IVF?)

Instead, I base it on when is the earliest the mind functions. From what I've seen, this is 6 months. It's the mind that sets us apart from the animals, therefore it's the mind that should decide.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.