FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2002, 07:12 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 6
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
<strong>q. 2. you are in a foxhole with five wounded men who will live but cannot move for now, a grenade lands in the foxhole, will you sacrifice yourself to save those five men?</strong>
Yes, I probably would... I like to think I would

Well, I should yes
Pulp is offline  
Old 08-15-2002, 07:17 PM   #22
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post

let us both go Pulp..." a rope made of many strands is not easily broken"!
lcb is offline  
Old 08-15-2002, 08:06 PM   #23
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 1,539
Post

I would be a hypocrite if I said I would do this or that in any given situation. There are good reasons which I would think would allow me to sacrifice my own life for others, but it's difficult to predict my actions, or those of anyone else, in the actual heat of the moment.

It would rationally appear to be worth it to save 5 lives for one, especially when you have the consent of the person to be sacrificed. However, survival instincts and numerous other factors would result in a complex mental tug-of-war.

*Updates questions again* There, now it's almost finished. Just like it will be this time next year, when I'm still refining it.
WinAce is offline  
Old 08-15-2002, 09:10 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Thumbs up

WinAce, I like your questionaire- even as is, it is well worth presenting to anyone who both claims to be religious, and claims to be willing to examine his own beliefs. Sad that far too few are willing to examine their faith.

When you complete it to your own satisfaction, you might call it to the attention of the board administrators. It may find a place in the SecWeb library!
Jobar is offline  
Old 08-16-2002, 03:54 PM   #25
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 1,539
Post

Thanks for the nice comment

I keep adding questions every single day, so I can't envision when it'll be completed to my own satisfaction. For instance, I just added what is possibly one of the most powerful, inspired by a post over at the ChristianForums:

Quote:
13. If people who have never heard the Gospels are judged on their relative merits, many morally objectionable results, such as infants, third-world tribesmen or honestly mistaken people unfairly going to hell, are removed. If that is the case, people who have heard the Gospels, however, will be judged mainly by whether or not they accepted them. The logical implications are completely shocking: if you're basically a good person, the main effect hearing the story of Jesus will have is increase your chances of going to Hell, should you reject it. Conversely, if you're a very evil person, hearing the Good News will only increase your chances of going to Heaven, should you accept it. Suppressing Christianity may thus paradoxically result in more good souls being saved and more evil ones being condemned, which is more in line with our own values of fairness. Given this stunning possibility, could completely refusing to evangelize Christianity itself, instead promoting a just ethical code, actually be the morally right thing to do, despite the possible consequences to your own salvation?
Yes ( ) No ( )
WinAce is offline  
Old 08-29-2002, 06:57 PM   #26
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 1,539
Post

Hah. I just got my first, very own <a href="http://www.tektonics.org/glennall01.html" target="_blank">ultra-patronizing rebuttal</a> on Tektonics.org courtesy of J.P. Holding himself. Is that like some atheist rite of passage?

I noticed they replied to an earlier, somewhat outdated version of the questionnaire so I'm now including version numbers in it.

[ August 29, 2002: Message edited by: WinAce ]</p>
WinAce is offline  
Old 08-30-2002, 07:09 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

I like the responses to the section about Human Psychology.

In essence:
"Yes, all these are perfectly acceptable explanations of human mental quirks but none of them apply because our mysticisms are true. Of course, our mysticisms aren't really mysticisms because they are true."
Philosoft is offline  
Old 08-30-2002, 08:05 AM   #28
K
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
Post

Wow! It scares me the amount of handwaving that some people can do to try to hide the obvious inconsistencies in their fairy tales.
K is offline  
Old 08-30-2002, 11:19 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,158
Post

In the "History of religion" section I suggest you add something about the parallels of Christian Gospels and Pagan Mythology, which is in close relation to number 2. It will give you a bit more fuel for that section. A good website about it is located here, <a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jcpa.htm" target="_blank">http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jcpa.htm</A>
uhcord is offline  
Old 08-31-2002, 01:35 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Post

I've been looking for an online text of Voltaire's The Questions of Zapata It is a hilarious satire, in which a friar is asking his superiors for advice on how to answer various perplexing questions that his flock keeps asking.

So far, I've not been able to find an English version. There seen to be several sites that have it online, but they are all in French, which do me no good whatsoever. Oh well...

Its been a while since I read it, and my books are in storage right now , but I seem to recall passages were he conludes that "apparently God doesn't know much about geography" or "anatomy", among other subjects you would expect the omniscient creator to be well aware of.

I will be going out there to pay the rent on the space early next week, and I'll grab it then. You may be able to adapt some of it to your questionnare. It is public domain material.

And congrats on your review making the big time!
(An aside, the essay I'm talking abourt is reviewed there as well.)

Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has..."
-- Martin Luther

[ August 31, 2002: Message edited by: wadew ]</p>
wade-w is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.