CodeMason

Actually, you don't even understand whan an assumption is. In fact, we have PROVEN your arguments wrong. But you will just call them "opinions" because you're far to stupid to even evaluate the evidence we have given you. If our complete and utter ripping to shreds of your pathetic drivel seems wrong to you, by all means, demonstrate this to us, instead of living in your sheltered world of fantasy all your life. Grow up.
I fail to see why you still call it "truth", when he have demonstrated it to be absolutely FALSE, beyond any reasonable doubt. But you will never reply to us, because you CAN'T. Your ignorant manure clods you call "arguments" are so far from the truth it makes me wonder if you're from a parallel universe where hamburgers eat people.
We don't care about your pathetic little site. It gets hardly any hits, and many of those seem to be of us coming to laugh at you and your insanity. The sites that you plaguarize your material from get far more hits than yours. And we're not "waging war" or anything of the sort on your beliefs. We're not dogmatic psychopaths like you. We merely embrace reality. The only problem we have is when creationists try to force their stupidity onto others.
What is hilarious is the sewerage you like to call arguments (and to think, you call it "well written" on your page, when I know several lower order primates that can write more coherently than you). I nearly wet myself laughing.
Wrong. You didn't read his post at all. If you want to "respond" to something, the proper way to do it would to actually know what you're responding to.
It's nice to know that you're lecturing us on maturity, when you can't even have the intellectual honesty to respond to our posts without lying through your teeth.
ROFL! Copied and pasted directly from Hovind.
There is a problem with this statement (besides it being a straw man and emotional plea). The frog had the teleological goal to turn into the prince. Evolution has no teleological goals. It is simply the process of what happens in any population of life or pseudolife in any enivornment, when they reproduce.
You're not answering the debunking of your rubbish because you don't want to, it's because you can't, and never will.
Thanks for the invitation, I may check it out if I have the time.
You came here to spout your stupidity at us. Refusing to accept the truth when it's put in front of your face is not generally considered open minded.
I was not dodging the subject because I was never in a debate with you in the first place. I just thought it would be interesting to refute your garbage and instead of creating a new thread, I posted it on this one. Have a problem with that?
TRUTH OUT*

Dr Rick

Quite idiotic; your inaccurate statements and repeated self-contradictions are one of the reasons your opinions are so easily dismissed

It's not uncommon for some insecure people to nervously laugh at that which they do not understand.

You're welcome...

...though it seems you didn't understand any of them. You're trying to make light of a subject you do not grasp by providing this quote. No one who understands the theory of evolution claims "a frog turns into a man." This is just one example of the immaturity and ignorance you've demonstrated in the brief time you've been posting here.

You are the one that is immature.

Thank God!

And shower ourselves with your ignorance and discourtesy? No, thank you.

That is an obvious lie. You came here with the ulimate purpose of proselytization, and you are very closed-minded.

Rick

theyeti

I immediately answered your question and you never responded satisfactorally -- you never disputed any of the facts that I brought up. You just dismissed them off hand and then claimed that there are creationist articles that have better "proof" [sic] behind them, despite the fact that you specifically said that you did not want to discuss that.

It became very clear on that thread that you had no intention of having dialouge, not with me and not with anyone else. It is because of your reluctance to discuss the issues that you raised that your email debate and website were brought up. These are the only places where we can get an idea of where you're coming from, since you would not share your ideas on the very thread that you started. It also became clear from your website and email debate that your arguments are of very poor quality, and are beneath the typical level of discourse for this board.

theyeti