FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2002, 01:57 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by LogicMania:
<strong>inscribe information in fecal matter?

</strong>
ICR publications already demonstrate the possibility of this.

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 05-30-2002, 07:16 AM   #12
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

Game, set, and match for Oolon!!!!!!! <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />
Coragyps is offline  
Old 05-30-2002, 07:51 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
Post

What's ICR publications? I wasn't even thinking but I guess it wasn't as original of an idea as I thought. I was actually coming up with it in jest.
LogicMania is offline  
Old 05-30-2002, 07:58 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
Post

Ok well how about this idea? Suppose you have a neuronic systems that can produce radio waves in specific patterns that could be read by organisms with these same neuronic systems and (seemingly telepathic) communication could be a result of such acts? I am not trying to justify telepathy occuring in human beings right now but could that be evolutionarily possible? I don't suppose that idea is original either? Can organic matter to even give off radio waves? I think it can, can't it?
LogicMania is offline  
Old 05-30-2002, 08:03 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
Post

Some form of electromagnetic radiation can induce electric potentials in neurons, right?
LogicMania is offline  
Old 05-30-2002, 08:04 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,597
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by LogicMania:
<strong>What's ICR publications? I wasn't even thinking but I guess it wasn't as original of an idea as I thought. I was actually coming up with it in jest.</strong>
Institute for
Creation
Research

Duane Gish, Henry & John Morris, et al. Creation "Science" at its best (which is to say, a veritable waste reclamation center of academia).

Bill
Bill Snedden is offline  
Old 05-30-2002, 09:35 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 77
Post

ah, lol
LogicMania is offline  
Old 06-01-2002, 11:34 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Lispli:
<strong>...but considering the phenomenon of convergent evolution, aren't certain forms more likely to occur than others?
</strong>
When I look at the literature, I find one group of scientists identifying some object as a hook for pulling down high branches (eg) because it looks like something a living species uses. Meanwhile, another group of scientists use the similarity of the two solutions to the same problem as evidence of convergent evolution. Circular arguments are the bugbear of evolution.

(Scepticism about some evolutionary arguments doesn't make me a creationist, incidentally. Most fields of science are beset with faulty conclusions.)

Fermi's paradox suggests to me that intelligence is not a high probability outcome of evolution.
beausoleil is offline  
Old 06-01-2002, 11:42 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Circular arguments are the bugbear of evolution.

(Scepticism about some evolutionary arguments doesn't make me a creationist, incidentally.


No, but misunderstanding them makes you look pretty silly.

Most fields of science are beset with faulty conclusions.)

I'm glad you told us this. I am sure we'll all be more careful in the future.

Fermi's paradox suggests to me that intelligence is not a high probability outcome of evolution.

In a universe with trillions of stars, even a low probability is going to have millions of examples.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-05-2002, 07:12 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Post

NOVA Online has a 2001 interview with Stephen Jay Gould <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/gould.html" target="_blank">here</a>.
Blinn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.