FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2003, 12:51 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Bumble Bee Tuna : Koy, you kick ass.
No, just nudge it a little . (watch it Philo)

Quote:
MORE: As does strong atheism. Seriously, I don't see anything wrong with saying you "believe' something that is so probably false.
Actually, I tend to discard the word "believe" entirely from my lexicon, since it is so easily misconstrued by theists.

I prefer to state: I think, don't think, or accept as true for the sake of argument.

It gets me into trouble, but then, that's what I live for around here.

Anything to shock-jack the proles from their complacency .

Quote:
[b]MORE: [/]b I "believe" that leprechauns don't exist.
Well, there's a good example. You are under no obligation whatsoever to "believe" any such thing, considering the fact that no compelling evidence exists to support a claim that they do exist.

The onus isn't on you to negate anything at all; it is on those who positively assert such beings factually exist (i.e., are non-fictional).

Quote:
MORE: I don't have evidence, just probability.
You don't need either. They do. The leprechauns, that is .

Actually, all they need is the gold.

Quote:
MORE: I don't "know" anything and I think God's existence falls well beyond the ranges of probability for me to believe.
There you go. A tad too pedantic for everyday use, but around here I think that works.

Quote:
MORE: I "believe" things that science dictates though there's actually a small probability that it's all just some big fake to make it look like those things are true.
Again, I'd avoid the use of the term "believe" in these parts, but, again, for everyday use, why not?

Why not indeed?
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 01:40 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 712
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft

[hijack]
Quick point-of-order. Koy has been proven wrong thusly: http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...threadid=46839
[/hijack] [/B]
I don't remember Holden being a "jr".

However, there was a Holden Caulfield Jr in Dean Koontz's False Memories, which was I was referring to in my reply to that thread...

HR
Hayden is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 02:14 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 712
Default Re: Can anyone categorise my "religious" beliefs?

Quote:
Originally posted by Olly Winkles
Ultimately I don't care whether God exists enough to call myself a theist, an atheist or an agnostic. What I do care about is the evils committed in the name of a God that religion has essentially defined, if not created.

I'm sure I can't be the only person with similar thoughts, so what word would you use to categorise my ideas? (careful )
I dub thee "Apathist"

HR
Hayden is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 03:22 AM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Family Man
True. But if it is legitimate not to believe in leprechauns why is it so gosh-darned awful not to believe in God?
It's not, I thought I had made that clear. If an individual makes a decision, based on whatever fairytale books they choose to read, to believe in God or leprechauns then that's fine and dandy. If the leprechaunists however organised their beliefs, grasped as much money as possible, used fear as a form of control, used their belief in leprechauns as a pretext for atrocity, then it becomes a problem.
Olly Winkles is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 03:29 AM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by southernhybrid
Here's one dictionary definition of agnostic that I usually like to use for those who call themselves agnostics.



1. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.

You sound like you might be comfortable in that category.

We could just call you a humanist or just a freethinker since you don't accept traditional religion.

I usually think of myself as a strong atheist because the idea that a god exists is nonsense to me. It's not that important to me to have a label though. Whatever you/we decide you are, welcome to the II. Hope you enjoy it here.
I like that answer. Thankyou. I think I might go for "humanist" because I certainly hold humanist views outside the realm of religious philosophy.

I feel I should reiterate though - my concept of God as a creator or divine spark is merely semantic and has no relationship to the God described in any Theistic texts. I believe that there is no Christian God nor Islamic God or any other in the terms described by humans.
Olly Winkles is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 09:52 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
Default

Does it really matter, Olly, where your beliefs place you?

I was about your age when I settled on the notion that if there were a divine genius which had laid down the matrix from which the Universe grew, and a divine spark which had triggered the transformation of the inanimate to the animate, it certainly had no interest in me as an individual. It was not the God which I had been brought up to think existed, but something so completely beyond human comprehension that trying to compehend it was pointless.
If I didn’t matter to it, why should it matter to me?
Well, it didn’t, and once that happened I didn’t care if such a thing existed or not.
I now only see a naturalistic universe, with no supernatural imputs; Science, I think, will eventually explain the Universe, Life and almost everything - and that it won’t find a divine genius or a divine spark.
Stephen T-B is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 03:37 PM   #27
Cthulhu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Quote:
Can anyone categorize my "religious" beliefs?
I'm going to classify you as a Scientologist, if it's okay with you.

I'm not saying that's what you are, but that's what I'd like to call you, for the simple reason that we have no Scientologists running around these boards and I think it's about high time we did.

C'mon, you could just pretend to be a Scientologist so we could all have some fun making Hubbard jokes. What do ya say?
 
Old 03-04-2003, 08:14 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
Talking

well I've always defined "believe" as "accept ____ as true" or something along those lines. And I certainly accept that "There is no God" is a true statement. The only way I could not "believe" or "know" that God does not exist is if I drifted into the realms of solipsism and decided I didn't believe or know anything at all.
*hopes he used the right philosophy term*

-B
Bumble Bee Tuna is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 12:51 AM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Stephen T-B
Does it really matter, Olly, where your beliefs place you?
Hell no, it's just whenever i get into a religious philosophical discussion and someone asks me if i'm an atheist or what, i get bored of saying 'well I'm an anti-religious Agnostic who is unwilling to completely deny God's existence, however....' etc. This thread has certainly cleared up my thoughts about the definitions of Agnostic and Atheistic though.
Olly Winkles is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 12:52 AM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 9
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Cthulhu
I'm going to classify you as a Scientologist, if it's okay with you.

I'm not saying that's what you are, but that's what I'd like to call you, for the simple reason that we have no Scientologists running around these boards and I think it's about high time we did.

C'mon, you could just pretend to be a Scientologist so we could all have some fun making Hubbard jokes. What do ya say?
I always wanted to meet the stars.
Olly Winkles is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.