Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-31-2003, 02:48 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
|
Am I the only one who thinks that the...
so-called 'Golden Rule' is a nonsense?
This sounds peculiar but I actually feel that not as many claim to follow it as is believed. |
03-31-2003, 03:49 AM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
Re: Am I the only one who thinks that the...
Quote:
In answer anyway: 1) no, you're obviously not the only one, but you're wrong anyway. There you go. Unsubstantiated statement answered with a non-substantiated statement of my own values. 2) So what if not as many follow it as is claimed by them ? Hypocrisy proves nothing. Neither does sophomoric nihilism, BTW. |
|
03-31-2003, 04:06 AM | #3 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
|
Re: Re: Am I the only one who thinks that the...
Quote:
Why am I wrong? Quote:
|
||
03-31-2003, 04:14 AM | #4 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
Quote:
You didn't bother trying to substantiate your claim that the Golden Rule was nonsense. When you make something near a full, rational argument as to why it supposedly is nonsense, then I'll substantiate my claim that you are simply wrong. Quote:
I did not write that I claim to follow the Golden Rule but do not really follow it; I simply pointed out that the fact that others who claim it but do not really follow it does not prove anything. It does not prove the Golden Rule is "nonsense". So, are you going to make any argument ? |
||
03-31-2003, 04:30 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 920B Milo Circle
Lafayette, CO
Posts: 3,515
|
I have a problem with the Golden Rule as illustrated by the following example:
Let us take, for example, the Inquisition. Catholic leaders are gathering up and burning infidels. The Catholic leader says, "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." And he also says, "Yes, if I were an infidel, then I should be subject to the same treatment. It would be for my own good and the good of society." Or, the slave owner who says, "If I were black, I would still have no objection against slavery; I would recognize that God placed me on this planet to serve my white master and do so unquestioningly." Or a child molester with fantasies of being a child who is being molested (or rapist who includes among his fantasies being a woman who is subject to this sort of treatment). Or the "dirty tricks" politician with a machiavellian philosophy who fully endorses and expects lies and deceit from all politicians. Or the highly-competitive corporate executive who fully endorses a corporate-darwinism account of governance that allows lies, deceipt, spying, and other under-handed tricks on the part of corporate executives. Or countless other examples that all fit the same pattern. |
03-31-2003, 04:42 AM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
Quote:
As you should know well, the best possible formulation of the Golden Rule is, "Do not do unto others what you would not like them to do to you" Now let's see you quibble with that. |
|
03-31-2003, 04:50 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
|
Quote:
|
|
03-31-2003, 04:54 AM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
Quote:
Like any rule stating human values, it is based on subjectivity and often intersubjectivity. So what ? There is no such thing as a fully objective human value, and no fully objective interpretations of them. Sooooo, meritocrat, are you going to come up with a real argument or not ? |
|
03-31-2003, 08:01 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 570
|
Quote:
It's not about if the rapist would mind being raped had he been a female - because he's not a female. It's about if the raper, as the person he is at that moment, would mind being raped. It's about the (white) slave owner minding to be treated like a (black) slave. The slave owner is a white slave owner who doesn't and can't know what it's like to be a black slave. He can only imagine. All of the examples, save the ones of the politician and the businessman, are abusingf the Golden Rule because they do not feature a "you" but a projection of the "you". With the examples of the businessman and the politician there's no such conflict: they, not someone they imagine they might possibly have been, treat people like they expect to be and don't mind being treated. To answer the original question: no I don't think the Golden Rule is nonsense. That's just my opinion though. |
|
03-31-2003, 11:38 AM | #10 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jordan
Posts: 133
|
Quote:
and the second thing to note is that your arguement against the golden-rule is inherently Contingent, so it is possible for it not to exist and at the same time can be logically necessary. but at this particular time also I am unable to see your arguement at all any where through this page. so until I am able to detect the arguement's metaphysical presence, I'd be more than happy to reply to it. thank you. yours truely: Psychic. :banghead: |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|