FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2003, 04:38 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default

Hello Craig and thank you for your valuable input!

Quote:
First, remind him that the prohibition is supposed to be based on the bible, not how well transfusions work. Remind him it's a faith issue that he shouldn't be trying to justify by other methods. This fact was pounded into our heads at the meetings.
I believe I did this when I told him that prohibition is not because of some scientific knowledge (he mentioned how diseases can transfer through blood), but because of goat herder rambling couple of thousand of years ago. And you have another good point that it's a faith issue.

Quote:
Ask him why some blood components are allowed while others are not. Then ask him why components not allowed in the past are now allowed. Then ask why organ transplants are now OK, while 25 years ago they weren't.
Yep, I reminded him how child’s and mother’s blood mix together in womb so there should be no reason to prohibit transfusion. If Yahweh allowed that, why shouldn't he allow transfusion? And yes, I tried to point him to the fact how JW stance to transplants and transfusion changed couple of times. But it's very hard, if not impossible, to start any process of rational reasoning in his head.
:banghead:
Quote:
Then ask how he feels about those JWs that died by refusing blood elements or organs that were forbidden in the past but are now allowed.
I did, at least partially. He said how JW don't wait for something bad to happen so that they can prove their "loyalty" to God. Then I showed him the front page of "Awake!" with those poor kids that died refusing transfusion with front page saying "Kids who put God first!". Disgusting.
Roller is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 06:47 AM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 255
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Roller
Yep, I reminded him how child’s and mother’s blood mix together in womb so there should be no reason to prohibit transfusion. If Yahweh allowed that, why shouldn't he allow transfusion?
Be careful here, this isn't altogether true; while fetal and materal blood do exchange oxygen and nutrients, they do NOT actually mix unless there is some trauma to the placenta.
During birth there is the potential for the fetus to be exposed to the mother's blood, and vice versa; though that is really more of an artifact of the traumatic experience of birth.
Kosmo is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 07:58 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

Just out of curiosity, how do they exchange oxygen and nutrients without mixing? Is there some sort of membrane across which oxygen can diffuse but that serves to prevent blood cells from crossing?
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 08:28 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
Just out of curiosity, how do they exchange oxygen and nutrients without mixing? Is there some sort of membrane across which oxygen can diffuse but that serves to prevent blood cells from crossing?
I’ll look it up, but that is about right, iirc. The mother’s blood has to be kept away from the foetus, because her immune system would instantly recognise it as foreign -- as the parasite it in effect is -- and would attack it.

This is why foetal Toxoplasma gondii infection is so dangerous. The Toxoplasma is normally held in check by the immune system, and causes little-to-no symptoms. But the foetus doesn’t have an immune system yet, and the mother’s one can’t get at the parasites. The Toxoplasma run riot, and can cause massive brain damage.

(This is all IIRC. It’s a while since I read Zimmer’s wonderful Parasite Rex.)

Cheers, DT
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 08:38 AM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 255
Default

Lobstrosity,

Yeah, that's pretty much it. It's not all that different from how oxygen/nutrient exchange works in normal tissue... across the capillary membrane. In the fetal circulation, think of it as though the placental villi (analagous to capillaries) are bathed in maternal blood, here the nutrient/O2 exhange takes place and then the fetal blood returns to the fetus via the umbilical vein. Of course, many substances pass through this 'barrier' freely (including maternal IgG antibodies) but blood cells do not.

edited for typo
Kosmo is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 09:03 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default

Learned Gentlemen,

Thank You for your clarification!

:notworthy
Roller is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 10:48 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,058
Default

Since the JWs are big on blood "components" then that's what you have to look at. And yes, some blood components do pass. Their own literature supports this.

The irony of all this of course is that if they believe blood should not be transfused or eaten then it should include ALL components, since in the bible is doesn't say to abstain from certain parts of blood, just blood.

The reason that they allow certain components is that there are quite a few treatments and vaccinations that contain these parts and if they denied them to their followers they would catch all kinds of shit for it. People would be dying from easily curable/preventable diseases and that would look bad.
Craig is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.