Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-22-2002, 09:15 AM | #391 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
|
|
05-22-2002, 03:25 PM | #392 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 624
|
Ed is surely the energizer bunny of creationists. How can guys stay awake for this drivel?
|
05-22-2002, 04:42 PM | #393 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Ed is surely the energizer bunny of creationists. How can guys stay awake for this drivel?
Some of us no longer can. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> d |
05-22-2002, 04:49 PM | #394 | |
New Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
<a href="http://members.ozemail.com.au/~thebobo/mud.htm" target="_blank">nice mudskipper page</a> is here, including a terrific photo by Tony Xu. And they don't even have lungs! |
|
05-22-2002, 07:00 PM | #395 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
|
Quote:
[b] [quote]lp: (a lot of other argument about Homo erectus specimens being either outside of or inside of the typical Homo sapiens range...) However, the average of H. erectus is distinctly different from that of H. sapiens, even if there is some overlap at the edges of their parameter ranges.[b][quote] The average of the bulldog is distinctly different from that of the doberman, even if there is some overlap at the edges of their parameter ranges. [b] Quote:
|
||
05-23-2002, 04:56 AM | #396 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
Quote:
Edited for spelling of "adaptibility" [sic]. [ May 23, 2002: Message edited by: Zetek ]</p> |
|
05-23-2002, 05:00 AM | #397 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
[ May 23, 2002: Message edited by: Zetek ]</p> |
05-23-2002, 05:44 AM | #398 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
05-23-2002, 06:13 AM | #399 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Quote:
Quote:
If, as is proposed, life (please also define) began as simple self-replicating molecules -- ie chemistry -- what, precisely, would you call a random change in one such molecule that gave it an advantage -- say, speed of replication -- over unmutated versions? Please explain the “adaptability and programming” present in a few bases of RNA. Once you’ve got self-replication, you will automatically get adaptation... and all the microevolution you can eat. Repeat, oh, say four billion years... If you like, you can invoke your god to light this particular blue touchpaper... but it doesn’t look much like Genesis 1&2! Quote:
TTFN, Oolon |
|||
05-23-2002, 07:27 PM | #400 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[b] Quote:
|
||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|