Wiploc

Dr. Rick:
> > The perfect, omni-god of Christianity is a logical
> > contradiction because of the existence of evil.
> > This doesn't mean that a lesser god couldn't exist,
> > but one that loves, knows, and can do all could not.

crc:
That's my position. I think it's bulletproof.


luvluv:
> I know that I made a pretty good showing of why that's
> not the case, and even were I to doubt my own abilities
> matt ballman absolutely hit that one out of the park on
> a thread involving both you and Thomas Metcalf. So I'm
> wondering why you are still parading that argument out
> here like we have never discussed it?

This is exciting to me. I would love it if you'd
repost your arguments, or direct me to where I
can read them. Or we could start another thread
to discuss just this.


> <snip>
> For instance, mattballman made an excellent
> defense from the standpoint of salvation recipients.
> In order to prove the existence of excessive evil, the
> atheologian would have to prove that as many, or
> more, salvation recipients would result from a world
> with less suffering. This is obviously impossible.

I don't understand. If he wanted to, couldn't
god save everybody in any world?
crc