FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2002, 01:31 PM   #21
WJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 812
Post

Shadow!

Good one... you gotta wonder though, if they shout it out too much, would they even feel guilty?

...ahh, never mind.
WJ is offline  
Old 07-11-2002, 02:16 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
Post

Koy,
Quote:
I can't think of a single sound theist argument.
Okay. Granted.
Quote:
The implication of course being that there aren't any and, further, cannot be any, so... since no such arguments can exist, no theist should ever either refer to logic or, for that matter, have anything at all to do with logic in any fashion as far as their beliefs are concerned, since it does not, can not and will not ever be properly applicable.
All that implication from "I can't think of a sound argument for theism"? Wow!

Anyhow, the thing is, if you did know a sound argument for theism, you'd be a theist. If there was an uncontentiously sound argument for theism, you'd know about it. But you aren't, and you don't, so... there doesn't really seem to be a point to the thread besides "I can't think of a sound argument for theism". Which I doubt anyone, theist or atheist, is very concerned to deny.
Clutch is offline  
Old 07-11-2002, 10:34 PM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 164
Post

<a href="http://atheist.8k.com/theology.html" target="_blank">http://atheist.8k.com/theology.html</a>

Best. Site. Ever.
Much thanks to the one who posted this.
But, more on topic, I don't think a sound argument could ever exist to prove that God (that is, Jehova) exists, because we would then have to be able to apply that same reasoning to every other god of every other religion and fail, since if Jehova exists, then the others do not.
For example, if I say that God exists because the universe couldn't have possibly come into being from nothing (which I know to be untrue - I'm just using this as an analogy), then I must be able to say that Allah does _not_ exist because the universe couldn't have possibly come from nothing. This, of course, is crap, because Allah, if existant, could have just as well created the universe as Jehova.
...I hope that made sense.
Denshuu is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 07:13 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Post

Quote:
WJ:
Good one... you gotta wonder though, if they shout it out too much, would they even feel guilty?
No. Too much repetition will just make the phrase meaningless, and then it would just be de minimis.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 07:40 AM   #25
WJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 812
Post

Interesting... it seems to say that human's can use language as some sort of subconscious reaction/manifestation that really has or can have no meaning in itself, on the conscious level. Almost like an ineffable mystery?

Perhaps logic and language are in fact meaningless here!

WJ is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 07:51 AM   #26
himynameisPwn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The problem with arguments for theism is they dont prove anything. Only that God could exist. Even if someone had a great argument, without scientific evidence the point is moot.
 
Old 07-12-2002, 08:12 AM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 251
Post

The page philosoft linked to is really funny. I still can't stop laughing.
AtlanticCitySlave is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 08:33 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally posted by Clutch:Anyhow, the thing is, if you did know a sound argument for theism, you'd be a theist.
No, actually, you would not technically, since if you had a sound argument for theism, you would have proved God's existence and therefore would no longer require "belief."

The necessarily uncertain state of the term "belief" would be replaced with the certain (i.e., demonstrably true) state of "know."

Quote:
MORE: If there was an uncontentiously sound argument for theism, you'd know about it. But you aren't, and you don't, so... there doesn't really seem to be a point to the thread besides "I can't think of a sound argument for theism". Which I doubt anyone, theist or atheist, is very concerned to deny.
Quite the contrary, mon frer, as is evident in these threads on a daily basis.

The unsound arguments are constantly being rehashed over and over and over again by theists, so the point of my thread was to establish once and for all--for as WJ knows and his pitiful genuflecting constantly declares to all who have the misfortune of smelling his fetid putrescence, I am the absolute ruler of the entire universe--that no theist may ever use any terminology of logic in any form to attempt to prove anything at all.

As everything WJ posts demonstrates, they have no comprehension of the purpose of logic and no ability to correctly apply it, yet they keep doing it over and over and over again as if--like with philo's link (yes, I thought it was funny, but that wasn't the point, since those actually are the unsound syllogisms theists keep dry humping around here)--this time it will be a sound argument.

Since none exist and everyone--including the pitiful Wally, whose ass and knees hurt so from being so consistently....ahem, civility. Yes....since no sound argument exists, I sought to put to rest once and for all anybody posting them here.

I have spoken....typed, I mean...SILENCE!
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 08:47 AM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Post

A summation of the Christian belief system in a nutshell:

Q: How do we know that God exists?
A: The Bible tells us so.
Q: Why do we believe the Bible?
A: We believe it because it is the Word of God.
Q: How do we know that it is the Word of God?
A: The Bible itself says so.
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 08:47 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 889
Post

Koy,
Quote:
Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi:
<strong>I can't.
</strong>
Big suprise there.

Quote:
Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi:
<strong>
So many try to use logic in their arguments, but beyond the most trivial, I can't think of a single sound theist argument.

Can anyone else and if so, please post it?

(I'm serious, by the way, I really can't come up with a single one; this isn't glib for the sake of being glib)
</strong>
I am struck by how meaningless this post is as there are no sound proofs for mathematics, logic, morality, economics and your mother yet we know they exist.

To seriously claim they do not exist because there is no 'sound proof' of them is asinine.

Ad infintum.

SOMMS
Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.