FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2002, 04:39 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: America
Posts: 14
Post Does a Creator equal God?

Just a little tought experiment... Even if we had a creator which i still see as a posibbilty does that mean that the Creator is God???

I don't think so.. but i would like to hear what the others have to say on this....

stu
stewbster is offline  
Old 06-08-2002, 05:11 PM   #2
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 4
Post

What definition of "god" are you using here? Do you mean the standard Christian version, or one of a Deist type? (Or something else entirely?)
Mr Diabolical is offline  
Old 06-08-2002, 06:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Everywhere I go. Yes, even there.
Posts: 607
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by stewbster:
<strong>Just a little tought experiment... Even if we had a creator which i still see as a posibbilty does that mean that the Creator is God???

I don't think so.. but i would like to hear what the others have to say on this....</strong>
I can imagine an unconscious organism self-organizing out of the fallout from a meta-universal disaster, one of its waste-products being universes like ours. If that's not god, but if it is the creator of this universe, then my answer has to be that this creator is not god. A lack of willpower would seem to undermine most traditional god-concepts.

Of course I can also imagine Brahma and Zeus, and I can imagine Teilhard's post-traditional Christian Omega-God, etc. But the evidence for special creation is nil, while the evidence for existence is fairly obvious. So I can imagine that the universe we experience(*) is not created, but merely existent - it's more parsimonious than any 'god' theory of which I'm aware.

It's a worthwhile and fun thought experiment. Wasn't Einstein famous for similar thought-experiments?

-Wanderer

(* - or its 'parent' system - I'm not a physicist but I vaguely recall skimming an article mentioning 'branes and dimensions higher than four in Analog recently.)
David Bowden is offline  
Old 06-08-2002, 07:18 PM   #4
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

If someone believes in a Creator of all we know - ourselves, the Earth, 100 billion galaxies - yet refuses to claim such entity is a "God", I feel sorry for such individual. Let down your pride and misguided sense of self-sufficiency and admit it.
RJS is offline  
Old 06-08-2002, 10:26 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mount Aetna
Posts: 271
Post

If someone believes that we need a Creator for all we know, ourselves, the Earth, 100 billion galaxies – and furthermore claims such entity is a “God”, I feel sorry for such an individual. Let go your fear and misguided sense of self-importance and admit it.

Sorry, could not resist. Humor aside, admit what?

If there was a Prime Cause, that “caused” everything, but wasn’t even knowable or concerned in a way we could say anything about, would this be a creator? It certainly isn't the Abrahamic god myth we all know from our popular Western fables.

If there was a Creator of all we know, why would we not call this Brahma? Or Allah? Or Bob, Creator-of-All?

.T.

If god exists, I want a restraining order.

[ June 08, 2002: Message edited by: Typhon ]</p>
Typhon is offline  
Old 06-09-2002, 04:31 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,301
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by stewbster:
<strong>Just a little tought experiment... Even if we had a creator which i still see as a posibbilty does that mean that the Creator is God???

I don't think so.. but i would like to hear what the others have to say on this....

stu</strong>
Since you capitolize "God" then very easily, no.
A creator does not need to be "God".
Although if "God" exists he has to be the creator.

Even when talking about "a god" and not "God", the creator doesn't have to be a god.
Liquidrage is offline  
Old 06-09-2002, 07:18 AM   #7
Vic
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Africa
Posts: 22
Post

Theism accepts the existence of a "kick-starter".
Atheism does not.
If the religious have their pet phrase "In the beginning god created ...", what is the pet phrase used by atheists?
Can any one of the latter belief complete the following sentence:
"In the beginning ........................."
Vic is offline  
Old 06-09-2002, 07:54 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,301
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Vic:
<strong>Theism accepts the existence of a "kick-starter".
Atheism does not.
If the religious have their pet phrase "In the beginning god created ...", what is the pet phrase used by atheists?
Can any one of the latter belief complete the following sentence:
"In the beginning ........................."</strong>
A better way of saying that might be
Theists believe in the existence of a "kick-starter".
Atheists do not.

"In the beinning" is currently an unknown.
Liquidrage is offline  
Old 06-09-2002, 10:31 AM   #9
Vic
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Africa
Posts: 22
Post

Quote:
"In the beinning" is currently an unknown.
Does that mean you are prepared to accept the possibility of a "kick-starter"?
Vic is offline  
Old 06-09-2002, 02:27 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Batavia, Ohio USA
Posts: 180
Post

In the beginning there was no time and no space.

Someone care to take it from there?
Foxhole Atheist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.