FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-12-2002, 11:45 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 640
Post

Thanks!

They sure know the rules, its even written on the back of the form for applying for chinese visa.
China has horrendous record on human rights issues, and that concerns me a lot. However, I think that for example Falun Gong members face much worse persecution than any Christian denomination in China.

Also, I am a bit annoyed with the statement of that society from US which printed those bibles that they'll keep trying. Yeah, very nice for white men sitting safely in California to keep trying when it is little yellow Hongkongnese who gets arrested for their "keep trying".

I guess I am also torn about this issue. Frankly speaking, I am sick and tired of missionaries.
On the other hand, I support civil rights. But I guess no country will tolerate religious cults.
It is only that chinese definition of "cult" is broader than usual, and their treatment of those who break any laws is always brutal. It isn't as if christians are getting it any worse than everybody else.
alek0 is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 12:36 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Victoria. Australia
Posts: 1,417
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
<strong>Can't have it both ways because hell is eternal damnation and the Chinese don't want to go to hell.</strong>
Merely the opinion of Christianity.

Quote:
<strong>People should not have the right to chose what they believe because not all religions work towards the betterment of mankind.</strong>
Then stop believing in Christianity because it most certainly doesn't work for the betterment of mankind.

By its fruits ye shall know it and we have no shortage of empirical proof that it creates smug, complacent people who have the repulsive arrogance to make assertions about people not having rights over their own minds.

Quote:
<strong>People should have the right to believe or not to believe which is not the same is the right to what they believe.</strong>
In other words: People don't have to believe what you do believe. Butthey're not allowed to believe what you don't believe.

Quote:
<strong>Americans do have the right to chose what they believe</strong>
Well yes of course! But so does everyone else Amos, it's just that sometimes it's not a right recognized by their peers or governments.

Quote:
<strong> but this is only because they have freedom of religion as part of the Constitution [QB]
No, it's actually because their constitution recognizes that all humans already do have certain inalienable rights such as freedom of religion.

Quote:
[QB](which is absurd from my point of view).</strong>
Because they might have beliefs different from your own.

And why does that bother you? Take a good look at yourself and ask honestly.

Why can't you tolerate the fact that other human beings do not accept your opinion as empirical truth?

What's so great and cosmically mighty about you that it should be enshrined in law that nobody can believe something that you don't even though they don't have to believe what you do?

Does your position even make sense?

Ask yourself Amos.
Waning Moon Conrad is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 01:00 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Post

Personally, I think that missionaries should be banned in all countries. If people want to go and work in the developing world then they should do that from a humanitarian view point and not to gain brownie points with God.

I was brought up to think of myself as a guest in other people’s countries and that I should behave appropriately. I don’t go to someone’s house and force my atheism on them. I saw the results of missionaries on the island I grew up on. They forced their own bigoted, repressive ideas on a population who were perfectly happy with their own Gods.

I remember at school in the UK, the headmistress collecting money to pay for missionaries in Africa. I refused to give any money as I said that they needed food not God. She had an absolute fit saying that the most important thing was that they died “saved.” How sick can you get?
Pandora is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 05:38 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: SE
Posts: 4,845
Post

From Idaho:
Quote:
I am torn. I think it is horrible that the Chinese government would restrict the rights of it's people to practice a particular religious philosphy.
Frankly I am a lot more concerned that the American government is trying to push a particular religious philosophy (Christianity, or at least theism) on it’s citizens in spite of our Constitution.
ecco is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 08:25 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,258
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by idaho:
<strong>

Welcome to the board. It is always nice to have people from elsewhere in the world participating.

Personally I think missionaries get what they deserve. They know the rules before they ever get there. The question is should we be voicing support for the people that want to practice Xianity or for the government to restrict the personal freedoms of it's citizens?</strong>
What personal freedom? Are they American citizens on American soil?

As to missionaries, yes I agree they usually get what they deserve since they do know the laws of the country they are going into and choose to ignore them like those two girls who went to Afghanistan did. They were absolutely guilty of what they were accused of and deserved the punishment metered out for it.

[ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: Orpheous99 ]</p>
Orpheous99 is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 08:47 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: University of Arkansas
Posts: 1,033
Post

I am very discouraged by some of the comments made here. I am an atheist, but I strongly defend the right of anyone to practice their religion, to evangelize (without coercion), and to do so in any nation.

As non-believers, we should be at the head of the list of people defending the right of anyone to proclaim their beliefs, regardless of how offensive or wrong they are.

Note the relevant portions from the UN Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
ex-preacher is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 09:06 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spudtopia, ID
Posts: 5,315
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ex-preacher:
<strong>I am very discouraged by some of the comments made here. I am an atheist, but I strongly defend the right of anyone to practice their religion, to evangelize (without coercion), and to do so in any nation.

As non-believers, we should be at the head of the list of people defending the right of anyone to proclaim their beliefs, regardless of how offensive or wrong they are.

[/b]</strong>
I agree. We should be the first to defend the right of people to believe no matter how those beliefs may differ from our own.

I do not beleive that missionairies should be protected under international law if they are willingly breaking the law of their host country.

There is a right way and a wrong way to encourage freedom and liberty in the world.
ex-idaho is offline  
Old 02-13-2002, 11:36 AM   #18
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Waning Moon Conrad:
<strong>
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Amos:
Can't have it both ways because hell is eternal damnation and the Chinese don't want to go to hell.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merely the opinion of Christianity.</strong>

Hell is religion specific but real and not just an opinion. It is the repulsive side of Christianity in action and the only suffient grounds for athiesm. Note, I object to your choice of the word "Christianity" because Christianity itself is non-religious ("son of man has no place to lie his head" and "there are no temples in the New Jerusalem)." This now means that you are looking at the people in hell while denying its existence because you do not know the difference.<strong>
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
People should not have the right to chose what they believe because not all religions work towards the betterment of mankind.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then stop believing in Christianity because it most certainly doesn't work for the betterment of mankind.

By its fruits ye shall know it and we have no shortage of empirical proof that it creates smug, complacent people who have the repulsive arrogance to make assertions about people not having rights over their own minds.</strong>

I have never declared myself a Christian nor a believer because I certainly do not wish to be associated with your concept of Christianity. I defend the philosophy of Catholicism and/or its history.

In America you are allowed to believe what you want and I do not agree with that Constitutional right. I am not an American and am not interested in changing anything but should be allowed to express my opinion on that matter and did/do point out that this very "freedom of religion" will lead to the fall of the American/Western empire. This is simply based on the fact that the mythology is needed for the survival of the tribe and will only be successful if it is faced into the right direction.<strong>
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
People should have the right to believe or not to believe which is not the same is the right to what they believe.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In other words: People don't have to believe what you do believe. Butthey're not allowed to believe what you don't believe.</strong>

I am not a believer but know the difference between right and wrong in our mythology.<strong>
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Americans do have the right to chose what they believe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well yes of course! But so does everyone else Amos, it's just that sometimes it's not a right recognized by their peers or governments.</strong>

The point here was that different religions lead to different ends and each nation should have the right to promote its national religion of choice. This goes back to my first premiss that the mythology is for the survival and prosperity of the tribe. If you deny this premiss my argument fails but for you to deny this you must first prove the theory wrong. <strong>
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
but this is only because they have freedom of religion as part of the Constitution
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's actually because their constitution recognizes that all humans already do have certain inalienable rights such as freedom of religion.</strong>

I disagree with this since mythologies are man made and we are all descendants of a mythology. We can change, certaily, but in our soul nature we are predestined by our ancestors. In our human nature we can change to become strangers to our soul nature. Having said this I must add that similar truths are universal and we may just find more affinity with other mythologies--which only proves perversion in our mythology.<strong>
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(which is absurd from my point of view).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they might have beliefs different from your own.
And why does that bother you? Take a good look at yourself and ask honestly

Why can't you tolerate the fact that other human beings do not accept your opinion as empirical truth?</strong>

But that doesn't bother me! Nothing actually bothers me and to accept my opinion would be to forfeit your own opinion and that is the last thing anybody should do.

My objection is just based on the fact that in Anthro 101 we learn that the mythology is for the survival of the tribe and if this is true why was freedom of religion incorporated in the Constitution. That is the absurd paradox. The point here is that I know this to be true.
 
Old 02-13-2002, 11:46 AM   #19
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ex-preacher:
<strong>I am very discouraged by some of the comments made here. I am an atheist, but I strongly defend the right of anyone to practice their religion, to evangelize (without coercion), and to do so in any nation.

Note the relevant portions from the UN Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

[/b]</strong>
To me this is most absurd and I must add that human rights are just a bundle of rights reserved for the lost by the lost to expand the horizon in which they can be lost. It spells the height of ignorance and lacks any inspiration.
 
Old 02-13-2002, 02:05 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,258
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ex-preacher:
<strong>I am very discouraged by some of the comments made here. I am an atheist, but I strongly defend the right of anyone to practice their religion, to evangelize (without coercion), and to do so in any nation.

As non-believers, we should be at the head of the list of people defending the right of anyone to proclaim their beliefs, regardless of how offensive or wrong they are.

Note the relevant portions from the UN Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
</strong>
People only have these so-called basic human rights and freedoms if they are strong enough to enforce them. Once that power is gone they are just meaningless words. Just let the USA turn into a theocracy and see just how fast these so-called rights and freedoms disappear.

[ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: Orpheous99 ]</p>
Orpheous99 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.