FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2009, 01:00 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by storytime View Post


The standard factors of Genesis is MYTH.

Are you saying man learned to speak less than 6000 years ago?
Yes. Myth = you don't have a historical name more than 6000. :wave:
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 07-25-2009, 01:02 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Bible Unearthed - and various forms of onegodisms are found in Egypt, Greece and Persia - and a little colony of those empires.

Actually, is that the issue with this little bit of the ane -- that it had more different rulers than anywhere else?
Not true. These were totally pagan belief systems with headbashing dieties. That Egypt experimented with a mono-sun-deity, for totally political reasonings, makes it mono-paganism, but still pagan.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 07-25-2009, 01:08 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Hang on, are you saying xianity ain't pagan?

Let me see - godman, sacrifice, logos, the twelve.....
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 07-25-2009, 01:24 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Hang on, are you saying xianity ain't pagan?

Let me see - godman, sacrifice, logos, the twelve.....
I don't target any kind of belief, be it pagan or monotheism. I do target falsehoods, false charges, villification, and relying on another's demise as the sole claim to fame. The latter should not be attached to a belief in God, and some belief systems appear incapable of performing this feat.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 07-26-2009, 01:38 AM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Hang on, are you saying xianity ain't pagan?
By definition, christianity is not pagan. In fact the word "pagan" as we know it today is of origin a christian jargon. It meant in Latin "of the country" and christianity apparently had most support in the cities, so anything not christian was equated with coming from the country and thus "pagan". These country people had weird ideas.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 07-26-2009, 01:42 AM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Has its roots in the true gods? Syncretic?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 07-26-2009, 06:20 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Hang on, are you saying xianity ain't pagan?
By definition, christianity is not pagan. In fact the word "pagan" as we know it today is of origin a christian jargon. It meant in Latin "of the country" and christianity apparently had most support in the cities, so anything not christian was equated with coming from the country and thus "pagan". These country people had weird ideas.


spin
Yet christianity has a common thread with pagan beliefs such Rome, Hellenism, ancient Briton and all parts of Europe, in is rituals and doctrines, especially in divine man, and a son sacrificing on behalf of the father. Here, the father becomes a cursory afterthought and less transcendent then the son, though it claims to be monotheistic via a novel interpretation.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 07-26-2009, 09:48 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Scott View Post
Genesis is, as we all know here in BC&H, a compilation of earlier texts which most likely evolved from "caveman" religions.
What is that based on? My reading of the Hebrew religion's origins are based on 100% logical doctrines and a clear separation from caveman and humanity's hitherto past. Abraham left his country and religion because of a thought which changed not only humanity but the universe itself: Monotheism. This factor alone makes all other religions, philosophies and ideologies mythical.
Morton Smith has pointed out that the differences between monotheism and polytheism are not that clear.

Prayers are almost always said to a single deity; when praying to that deity similar epithets are used that we see in Hebrew prayers, such as greatest of all the gods, etc. There are a few exceptions to this, there are some Egyptians examples of worshiping two gods simultaneously; but this seems unusual.

Even today, individually we might be members of a faith that believes in a single God; yet there are many different religions and it is arguable that at least some of the attributes of the god they worship are different from other faiths.

My recent thinking, at least, makes me wonder if monotheism was the revolutionary development that it is often being credited with being,
semiopen is offline  
Old 07-26-2009, 05:25 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by semiopen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

What is that based on? My reading of the Hebrew religion's origins are based on 100% logical doctrines and a clear separation from caveman and humanity's hitherto past. Abraham left his country and religion because of a thought which changed not only humanity but the universe itself: Monotheism. This factor alone makes all other religions, philosophies and ideologies mythical.
Morton Smith has pointed out that the differences between monotheism and polytheism are not that clear.

Prayers are almost always said to a single deity; when praying to that deity similar epithets are used that we see in Hebrew prayers, such as greatest of all the gods, etc. There are a few exceptions to this, there are some Egyptians examples of worshiping two gods simultaneously; but this seems unusual.

Even today, individually we might be members of a faith that believes in a single God; yet there are many different religions and it is arguable that at least some of the attributes of the god they worship are different from other faiths.

My recent thinking, at least, makes me wonder if monotheism was the revolutionary development that it is often being credited with being,
I doubt your Mr. Smith ever practiced Monotheism or understands it. What is important is that most nations were once polytheistic, and one became montheistic - since their birth, never having been polytheistic. While Abraham's ancesters were polytheistic, his descendents via Isaac and Jacob were not. The laws which monotheism demands was not acceptable to most people - specially so with Europe.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 07-26-2009, 06:04 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by semiopen View Post

Morton Smith has pointed out that the differences between monotheism and polytheism are not that clear.

Prayers are almost always said to a single deity; when praying to that deity similar epithets are used that we see in Hebrew prayers, such as greatest of all the gods, etc. There are a few exceptions to this, there are some Egyptians examples of worshiping two gods simultaneously; but this seems unusual.

Even today, individually we might be members of a faith that believes in a single God; yet there are many different religions and it is arguable that at least some of the attributes of the god they worship are different from other faiths.

My recent thinking, at least, makes me wonder if monotheism was the revolutionary development that it is often being credited with being,
I doubt your Mr. Smith ever practiced Monotheism or understands it. What is important is that most nations were once polytheistic, and one became montheistic - since their birth, never having been polytheistic. While Abraham's ancesters were polytheistic, his descendents via Isaac and Jacob were not. The laws which monotheism demands was not acceptable to most people - specially so with Europe.
I doubt that he shared your keen understanding of the subject.

The paper I was referring to is The Common Theology of the Ancient Near East, in Essential Papers on Israel and the Ancient Near East.

Morton_Smith
semiopen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.