FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2013, 01:25 PM   #131
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Primary residence in New York State
Posts: 231
Default

Btw, when I entitled this thread "Was the Original Jesus a Militant", I was not referring to the fictional Jesus Christ of the gospels.

I was suggesting the original militant and historic messiah figure(s) of that time may have been the kernel or the inspiration for the anti-messiah figure of JC of the Roman approved gospel tales.

I see the gospels as a satire or lampoon that ridicules the failed efforts of real messiah-aspirants of that time.
Onias
Onias is offline  
Old 05-16-2013, 02:26 PM   #132
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onias View Post
Btw, when I entitled this thread "Was the Original Jesus a Militant", I was not referring to the fictional Jesus Christ of the gospels.

I was suggesting the original militant and historic messiah figure(s) of that time may have been the kernel or the inspiration for the anti-messiah figure of JC of the Roman approved gospel tales.

I see the gospels as a satire or lampoon that ridicules the failed efforts of real messiah-aspirants of that time.
Onias
That is your precise problem. You are asking about a Jesus of which there is no known evidence.

Effectively, your supposed Militant Jesus is also a Jesus of Faith.

Your supposed Militant Jesus has no more evidence than Jesus that was born of a Ghost.

You must have realized that NT Jesus was imagined into existence using Hebrew Scripture.

If you did not use the NT to imagine your Militant Jesus then you must have used your own imagination.

Militant Jesus=NT Jesus= the products of imagination.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-16-2013, 02:50 PM   #133
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Primary residence in New York State
Posts: 231
Default

aa,
It is not a militant Jesus I imagine but the precursor to the fictional JC who may have inspired the story of a pacifist Jesus who was actually an anti-messiah.

And of course all ideas come from our imagination, and that should go without saying.
Onias is offline  
Old 05-16-2013, 03:55 PM   #134
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onias View Post
I see the gospels as a satire or lampoon that ridicules the failed efforts of real messiah-aspirants of that time.
What do you see the gnostic gospels as being?




εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
mountainman is offline  
Old 05-16-2013, 04:21 PM   #135
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NW United States
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onias View Post
aa,
It is not a militant Jesus I imagine but the precursor to the fictional JC who may have inspired the story of a pacifist Jesus who was actually an anti-messiah.


And of course all ideas come from our imagination, and that should go without saying.
I think Josephus says that when Eleazar defeated Cestius the Jewish people thought that God was on their side. Meaning Eleazar was the chosen one of God. Maybe

"Eleazar ben Simon was a Zealot leader during the First Jewish-Roman War who fought against the armies of Cestius Gallus, Vespasian, and Titus Flavius. From the onset of the war in 66 CE until the destruction of the temple in 70 CE, he fought vehemently against the Roman garrisons in Judea and against his fellow Jewish political opponents in order to establish an independent Jewish state at Jerusalem."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleazar_ben_Simon
jdboy is offline  
Old 05-16-2013, 08:50 PM   #136
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Primary residence in New York State
Posts: 231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onias View Post
I see the gospels as a satire or lampoon that ridicules the failed efforts of real messiah-aspirants of that time.
What do you see the gnostic gospels as being?




εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia
The gnostic gospels are in a wholly different category.

I think they were suppressed because they promised a path to salvation and the Godhead that did not involve any interaction or approval from worldly authorities.

In contrast, the gospels and especially the Paulines urged obedience to the governing authorities and were therefore allowed to survive, thrive and proliferate.
Onias
Onias is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.