JAK1

No verified or verifiable evidence for God has been presented.

JAK

Johnny Skeptic

Would you like to present some? What is your world view?

aa5874

I am also waiting for evidence.

JAK1

JAK previously:
No verified or verifiable evidence for God has been presented.

Johnny Skeptic state:
Would you like to present some? What is your world view?

No compelling evidence for God has been presented. I would not defend any God myth. Your second question is too vague to address. I have no idea what you intend by the question.

JAK

Johnny Skeptic

Regarding my second question, more specifically, are you an atheist, an agnostic, a Deist, a liberal Christian, or something else? Your viewer profile does not clearly state what your beliefs are.

JAK1

Perhaps I’m a soft agnostic and an atheist. God myths are unreliable. There are many of them. Most who subscribe to any one of them fail to recognize the multiplicity of God myths. If they’re Christian of some denomination, sect, or cult, they also fail to appreciate the fragmentation of Christianity particularly following the Protestant Reformation (1511). While I subscribe to the general conclusions of agnostics, clearly we learn more about the universe as time passes. No one can predict with certainty just what humans may discover in the coming decades or centuries -- if the human race continues to survive on the planet.

Your question here has improved clarity.

The pundits for Christianity whom I have seen, continue to reflect doctrinal shift. All the various Christian groups loosely or strictly organized demonstrate those doctrinal shifts as they selectively quote their Bibles emphasizing particular scripts and minimizing others. There is much contention and disagreement as demonstrated by the many groups which tend to claim that their interpretations of the religion are the correct interpretations.

Most spend little time, if any, studying the evolution of their particular group and its history even over a few hundred years. But they’re quick to declare with certainty that their dogma is correct/true/accurate, etc.

JAK